Download PDF
Physikalische Medizin, Rehabilitationsmedizin, Kurortmedizin 2015; 25(03): 136-140
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1548771
Wissenschaft und Forschung
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Predictors of Length of Stay in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury

Prädiktoren der Aufenthaltsdauer von Patienten mit Rückenmarksverletzungen
S. Milicevic
1   Clinic of Rehabilitation Dr M. Zotovic, Spinal Cord Injury, Belgrade, Serbia
,
Z. Bukumiric
2   Medical Faculty in Belgrade, Institute of Medical Statistics and Informatics, Belgrade, Serbia
,
A. K. Nikolic
3   Institute of Rheumatolgy, PRM, Belgrade, Serbia
,
A. Sekulic
4   Clinic of Rehabilitation Dr M. Zotovic, Child Rehabilitation, Belgrade, Serbia
,
G. Trajkovic
5   University of Belgrade, School of Medicine, Institute of Medical Statistics and Informatics, Belgrade, Serbia
,
A. Corac
6   Medical Faculty in Pristina – Kosovska Mitrovica, Department of Preventive Medicine, Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia
,
S. Jankovic
7   Faculty of Medical Science in Kragujevac, Institute of Pharmacology, Kragujevac, Serbia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 29 August 2014

accepted 25 February 2015

Publication Date:
10 June 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose: SCI are one of the leading causes of disabilities around the world. Length of stay in patients with spinal cord injury depends on many medical and non-medical factors, especially of health-care system and social environment.

Material and Method: The study included 529 patients with spinal cord injuries admitted in Clinic for rehabilitation “Dr M. Zotovic”, Belgrade, Serbia, from January 2000 to December 2009. The factors influencing length of stay in our study were: age, gender, neurological level and completeness of injury, etiology of injury, methods of treatment, secondary complications and associated injuries. Length of stay in this study was defined from the date of admission to the date of discharge from rehabilitation.

Results: Median length of rehabilitation is 134 days (range, 28.0–533.0). The average age of survey respondents was 46.1±16.8 years. In this study 382 (72.2%) of patients were male and 147 (27.8%) were female. There were 180 (34.0%) tetraplegic and 349 (66%) paraplegic patients. In the multivariate Cox regression model, statistically significant predictors of length of stay were: neurological level of injury (p=0.014), completeness of the lesion (p=0.048), ASIA scale (p<0.001), age (p=0.043), urinary tract infection (p<0.001) and spasticity (p=0.042) as complications during rehabilitation.

Conclusion: Reducing the length of stay would significantly decrease the overall financial costs for patients with spinal cord injury. Construction of the specialized centers for rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injury and better coordination between primary care and rehabilitation centers would contribute to it.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Rückenmarksverletzungen gehören weltweit zu den Hauptursachen für Behinderungen. Die Verweildauer von Patienten mit Rückenmarksverletzung hängt von vielen medizinischen und nichtmedizinischen Faktoren ab, insbesondere vom Gesundheitssystem und dem sozialen Umfeld.

Material und Methode: In die Studie wurden 529 Patienten mit Rückenmarksverletzung eingeschlossen, die in die Rehabilitationsklinik „Dr. M. Zotovic“ in Belgrad, Serbien, zwischen Januar 2000 und Dezember 2009 eingewiesen worden waren. Die Einflussfaktoren in unserer Studie auf die Verweildauer waren: Alter, Geschlecht, Höhe und Ausmaß der Läsion, Ätiologie der Verletzung, Behandlungsmethoden, Sekundärkomplikationen und Begleitverletzungen. Die Verweildauer war in dieser Studie definiert als Zeitraum vom Datum der Einweisung bis zum Datum der Entlassung aus der Rehabilitation.

Ergebnisse: Die mittlere Verweildauer in der Rehabilitation lag bei 134 Tagen (Bereich: 28,0–533,0) Das mittlere Alter der Studienteilnehmer betrug 46,1±16,8 Jahre. In dieser Studie waren 382 (72,2%) der Patienten männlich und 147 (27,8%) weiblich. 180 (34,0%) der Patienten hatten eine hohe Querschnittlähmung (Tetraplegie) und 349 (66%) eine Paraplegie. Im multivariaten Cox-Regressionsmodel waren die statistisch relevanten Pradiktoren auf die Verweildauer: Läsionshöhe (p=0,014), Ausmaß der Läsion (p=0,048), AIS Skala (p<0,001), Alter (p=0,043), Harnwegsinfektion (p<0,001) und Spastik (p=0,042) als Komplikationen während der Rehabilitation.

Schlussfolgerung: Eine Verringerung der Verweildauer würde die Gesamtkosten für Patienten mit Rückenmarksverletzungen signifikant senken. Die Einrichtung von spezialisierten Rehabilitationszentren für Patienten mit Rückenmarksverletzung und eine bessere Koordination zwischen Erstversorgung und Rehabilitationszentrum würden dazu beitragen.

Key words

spinal cord lesions - length of stay - prediction - rehabilitation

Schlüsselwörter

Rückenmarksverletzungen - Verweildauer - Prädiktion - Rehabilitation
 

  • References

  • 1 Lamontagne ME, Gagnon S, Allaire AS et al. Effect of rehabilitation length of stay on outcomes in individuals with traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury: a systematic review protocol. Systematic Reviews 2013; 2: 59 http://www.systematicreviewsjournal.com/content/2/1/59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Parent S, Barchi S, LeBreton M et al. The Impact of Specialized Centers of Care for Spinal Cord Injury on Length of Stay, Complications, and Mortality: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Neurotrauma 2011; 28: 1363-1370 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2009.1151.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Jiménez-Ávila JM, Calderón-Granados A, Bitar-Alatorre WE. Direct cost of spinal cord injuries. Cir Cir 2012; 80: 435-441
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Mahabaleshwarkar R, Khanna R. National hospitalization burden associated with spinal cord injuries in the United States. Spinal Cord 2014; 52: 139-144 DOI: 10.1038/sc.2013.144.. Epub 2013 Nov 26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center . 2010 Annual statistical report for the spinal cord injury model systems. Alabama: National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center; 2010: 17-18
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Norton L. Spinal cord injury Australia 2007-08. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2010: 15-16
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Hye JJ, Park J, Hyung-Ik S. Length of Hospital Stay in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury. Ann Rehabil Med 2011; 35: 798-806
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ronen J, Itzkovich M, Bluvshtein V et al. Length of stay in hospital following spinal cord lesions in Israel. Spinal Cord 2004; 42: 353-358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Chu D, Yi-Hui L, Ching-Heng L et al. Prevalence of associated injuries of spinal trauma and their effect on medical utilization among hospitalized adult subjects – a nationwide data-based study. BMC Health Services Research 2009; 9: 137 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-137.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Marcel PD, Jeanne M, Zanca MJ. Factors Complicating Treatment Sessions in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: Nature, Frequency, and Consequences. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2013; 94 (Suppl. 02) S115-S124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Osterthun R, Post MW, van AFW. Characteristics, length of stay and functional outcome of patients with spinal cord injury in Dutch and Flemish rehabilitation centres. Spinal Cord 2009; 47: 339-344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation . Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (including the FIMt Instrument), version 5.1. State University of New York; Buffalo: 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Dodds TA, Matrin DP, Stolov WC et al. A validation of the Functional Independence Measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 531-536
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 American Spinal Injury Association/International Medical Society of Paraplegia (ASIA/IMSOP) . International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (Revised edition). American Spinal Injury Association; Chicago: 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Kirshblaum SC, Memmo P, Kim N et al. Comparison of the revised 2000 American Spinal Injury Association Classification Standards with the 1996 Guidelines. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 81: 502-505
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 1987; 67: 206-207
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Al-Jadid SM, Asirvatham AR. An analysis length of stay in traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injured patients. Saudi Med J 2010; 31: 555-559
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Tuğcu I, Tok F, Yilmaz B et al. Epidemiologic data of the patients with spinal cord injury: Seven years’ experience of a single center. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2011; 17: 533-538
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Jolien JV, Marcel WMP, Peter N et al. Rehabilitation of Patients with Nontraumatic Spinal Cord Injury in the Netherlands: Etiology, Length of Stay, and Functional Outcome. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2013; 19: 195-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ploumis A, Kolli S, Patrick M et al. Length of stay and medical stability for spinal cord-injured patients on admission to an inpatient rehabilitation hospital: a comparison between a model SCI trauma center and non-SCI trauma center. Spinal Cord 2011; 49: 411-415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Silver J, Ljungberg I, Alexander Libin A et al. Barriers for individuals with spinal cord injury returning to thecommunity: A preliminary classification. Disability and Health Journal 2012; 5: 190-196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar