Mit der Zentralisation besser diagnostizieren und prognostizieren

Zusammenfassung

Effektivität: Immer mehr Klassifikationssysteme für Patienten mit spinalen Schmerzen integrieren die Zentralisation. Sie ist ein nachweislich zuverlässiges Instrument. Unsere Schwerpunktautoren Helen Clare und Stephen May meinen, dass sie fest zur Untersuchung gehören sollte.

• Literatur

• 1 Aina A, May S, Clare H. The centralization phenomenon of spinal symptoms: A systematic review. Man Ther 2004; 9 (3) 134-143
• 2 Albert HB, Hauge E, Manniche C. Centralization in patients with sciatica: Are pain responses to repeated movements and positioning associated with outcomes or types of disc lesions?. Eur Spine J 2011;
• 3 Al-Obaidi S, Al-Sayegh N, Nakhi H et al. Effectiveness of McKenzie intervention in chronic low back pain: A comparison based on the centralization phenomenon utilizing selected bio-behavioral and physical measures. Int J of Phys Med and Rehabil 2013; 1: 128
• 4 Broetz D, Hahn U, Maschke E et al. Lumbar disc prolapse: Response to mechanical physiotherapy in the absence of changes in magnetic resonance imaging. Report of 11 cases NeuroRehab 2008; 23: 289-294
• 5 Broetz D, Kueker W, Maschke E et al. A prospective trial of mechanical physiotherapy for lumbar disk prolapse. Journal of Neurology 2003; 250: 746-749
• 6 Browder DA, Chlids JD, Cleland JA. Effectiveness of an extension-oriented treatment approach in a subgroup of subjects with low back pain: A randomized clinical trial. Physical Therapy 2007; 87: 1608-1618
• 7 Bybee F, Olsen D, Cantu-Boncser G et al. Centralization of symptoms and lumbar range of motion in patients with low back pain. Physio Theory Pract 2009; 25: 257-267
• 8 Christiansen D, Larsen K, Jensen OK et al. Pain response classification does not predict long-term outcome in sick listed low back pain patients. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010; 40: 606-615
• 9 Delitto A, Cibulka MT, Erhard RE et al. Evidence for use of an extension-mobilization category in acute low back syndrome: A prescriptive validation pilot study. Physical Therapy 1993; 73: 216-222
• 10 Dionne CP, Bybee RF, Tomaka J. Interreliability of McKenzie assessment in patients with neck pain. Physiotherapy 2006; 92: 75-82
• 11 Donelson R, Aprill C, Medcalf R et al. A prospective study of centralization of lumbar and referred pain. A predictor of symptomatic discs and annular competence Spine 1997; 22 (10) 1115-1122
• 12 Donelson R, Murphy K, Silva G. Centralisation phenomenon: Its usefulness in evaluating and treating referred pain. Spine 1990; 15 (3) 211-213
• 13 Donelson R, Silva G, Murphy K. Centralization phenomenon. Its usefulness in evaluating and treating referred pain. Spine 1990; 15 (3) 211-213
• 14 Edmond SL, Cutrone G, Werneke MW et al. Association between centralization and directional preference and functional and pain outcomes in patients with neck pain. JOSPT 2014; 44: 68-75
• 15 Edmond SL, Werneke MW, Hart DL. Association between centralization, depression, somatization and disability among patients with nonspecific low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010; 40: 801-810
• 16 Erhard RE, Delitto A, Cibulka MT. Relative effectiveness of an extension program and a combined program of manipulation and flexion and extension exercises in patients with acute low back pain. Physical Therapy 1994; 74 (12) 1093-100
• 17 Fritz JM, Brennan GP, Clifford SN et al. An examination of the reliability of a classification algorithm for subgrouping patients with low back pain. Spine 2006; 31 (1) 77-82
• 18 Fritz JM, Delitto A, Erhard RE. Comparison of classification-based physical therapy with therapy based on clinical practice guidelines for patients with acute low back pain. A RCT. Spine 2003; 28: 1363-1372
• 19 George SZ, Bialosky JE, Donald DA. The centralization phenomenon and fear-avoidance beliefs as prognostic factors for acute low back pain: A preliminary investigation involving patients classified for specific exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2005; 35: 580-588
• 20 Hefford C. McKenzie classification of mechanical spinal pain: profile of syndromes and directions of preference. Manual Therapy 2008; 13: 75-81
• 21 Karas R, McIntosh G, Hall H et al. The relationship between nonorganic signs and centralization of symptoms in the prediction of return to work for patients with low back pain. Phys Ther 1997; 77: 354-360
• 22 Kilby J, Stigant M, Roberts A. The reliability of back pain assessment by physiotherapists using a „McKenzie algorithm”. Physiotherapy 1990; 9: 579-583
• 23 Kilpikoski S, Airaksinen O, Kankaanpaa M et al. Interexaminer reliability of low back pain assessment using the McKenzie method. Spine 2002; 27 (8) E207-E214
• 24 Kilpikoski S, Alen M, Simonen R et al. Does centralizing pain on the initial visit predict outcomes among adults with low back pain?. Manuelle thera 2010; 14: 136-141
• 25 Laslett M, April CN, McDonald B et al. Centralization as a predictor of provocation discography results in chronic low back pain, and the influence of disability and distress on diagnostic power. Spine J 2005; 5: 370-380
• 26 Laslett M, McDonald B, April CN et al. Clinical predictors of screening lumbar zygapophyseal joint blocks: Development of clinical prediction rules. Spine Journal 2006; b 6: 370-370
• 27 Long A. The centralization phenomenon: Its usefulness as a predictor of outcome in conservative treatment of chronic low back pain (a pilot study). Spine 1995; 20 (23) 2513-2521
• 28 Long A, Donelson R, Fung T. Does it matter which exercise? A randomized control trial of exercise for low back pain. Spine 2004; 29: 2593-2260
• 29 Long A, May S, Fung T. The comparative prognostic value of directional preference and centralization: A useful tool for front-line clinicians?. J Manual Manip Thera 2008; 16: 248-254
• 30 May S, Aina A. Centralization and directional preference: A systematic review. Manual Therapy 2012; 17: 497-506
• 31 McKenzie RA. The Lumbar Spine: Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy. Waikanae, New Zealand: Spinal Publications; 1981
• 32 McKenzie RA, May S. The Lumbar Spine: Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy. 2^nd edition. New Zealand: Spinal Publications; 2003
• 33 Mitchell UH, Wooden MJ, McKeough DM. The short-term effect of lumbar positional distraction. Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 2001; 9 (4) 213-221
• 34 Murphy DR, Hurwitz EL. A theoretical model for the development of a diagnosis-based clinical decision rule for the management of patients with spinal pain. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2007; 8: 75
• 35 Niemisto l, Saran S, Lahtinen-Suopanki T et al. Predictive factors for 1-year outcome for chronic low back pain following manipulation, stabilizing exercises and physician consultation or physician consultation alone. J of Rehab Medi 2004; 36: 104-109
• 36 Petersen T, Olsen S, Laslett M et al. Inter-tester reliability of a new diagnostic classification system for patients with non-specific low back pain. Aust J Physiother 2004; 50: 85-91
• 37 Rapala A, Rapala K, Lukawski S. Correlation between centralization or peripheralization of symptoms in low back pain and the results of magnetic reasoning imaging. Ortopedia Traumatologia Rehabilitacja 2006; 8: 531-536
• 38 Schmidt I, Rechter L, Hansen VK et al. Prognosis of subacute low back pain patients according to pain response. European Spine Journal 2008; 17: 57-63
• 39 Skikic EM, Suad T. The effects of McKenzie exercises for patients with low back pain, our experience. Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences 2003; 3 (4) 70-75
• 40 Skytte L, May S, Petersen P. Centralization: Its prognostic value in patients with referred symptoms and sciatica. Spine 2005; 30: E293-E299
• 41 Sufka A, Hauger B, Trenary M et al. Centralization of low back pain and perceived functional outcome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 27 (3) 205-212
• 42 Tuttle N. Is it reasonable to use an individual patient’s progress after treatment as a guide to ongoing clinical reasoning. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 2009; 32: 396-403
• 43 Werneke MW, Deutscher D, Hart D et al. McKenzie Lumbar Classification. Spine 2014; 39: E182-E190
• 44 Werneke MW, Hart DL. Centralization: Association between repeated end-range pain responses and behavioral signs in patients with acute non-specific low back pain. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37 (5) 286-290
• 45 Werneke M, Hart DL. Centralization phenomenon as a prognostic factor for chronic low back pain and disability. Spine 2001; 26 (7) 758-765
• 46 Werneke M, Hart DL, Cook D. A descriptive study of the centralization phenomenon: A prospective analysis. Spine 1999; 24 (7) 676-683
• 47 Werneke MW, Hart D, Cutrone G et al. Association between directional preference and centralization in patients with low back pain. JOSPT 2011; 41: 22-31
• 48 Werneke MW, Hart DL, George SZ et al. Clinical outcomes for patients classified by fear-avoidance beliefs and centralization phenomenon. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2009; 90: 768-777
• 49 Werneke MW, Hart D, Oliver D et al. Prevalence of classification methods for patients with lumbar impairments using the McKenzie syndromes, pain pattern, manipulation and stabilization clinical prediction rules. J Man Manip Ther 2010; 18: 197-210
• 50 Werneke M, Hart DL, Resnik L et al. Centralization: Prevalence and effect on treatment outcomes using a standardized operational definition and measurement method. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2008; 38: 116-125
• 51 Williams MM, Hawley JA, McKenzie RA et al. A comparison of the effects of two sitting postures on back and referred pain. Spine 1991; 16 (10) 1185-1191
• 52 Young S, April C, Laslett M. Correlation of clinical examination characteristics with three sources of low back pain. Spine Journal 2003; 3: 460-465