J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2015; 76(05): 331-339
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1543967
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Occipitocervical Fusion Surgery: Review of Operative Techniques and Results

Sunil Kukreja
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
,
Sudheer Ambekar
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
,
Anthony H. Sin
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
,
Anil Nanda
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

02. August 2014

29. Oktober 2014

Publikationsdatum:
27. April 2015 (online)

Abstract

Objective Varying types of clinicoradiologic presentations at the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) influence the decision process for occipitocervical fusion (OCF) surgery. We discuss the operative techniques and decision-making process in OCF surgery based on our clinical experience and a literature review.

Material and Methods A total of 49 consecutive patients who underwent OCF participated in the study. Sagittal computed tomography images were used to illustrate and measure radiologic parameters. We measured Wackenheim clivus baseline (WCB), clivus-canal angle (CCA), atlantodental distance (ADD), and Powers ratio (PR) in all the patients.

Results Clinical improvement on Nurick grading was recorded in 36 patients. Patients with better preoperative status (Nurick grades 1–3) had better functional outcomes after the surgery (p = 0.077). Restoration of WCB, CCA, ADD, and PR parameters following the surgery was noted in 39.2%, 34.6%, 77.4%, and 63.3% of the patients, respectively. Complications included deep wound infections (n = 2), pseudoarthrosis (n = 2), and deaths (n = 4).

Conclusion Conventional wire-based constructs are superseded by more rigid screw-based designs. Odontoidectomy is associated with a high incidence of perioperative complications. The advent of newer implants and reduction techniques around the CVJ has obviated the need for this procedure in most patients.

 
  • References

  • 1 Ding X, Abumi K, Ito M , et al. A retrospective study of congenital osseous anomalies at the craniocervical junction treated by occipitocervical plate-rod systems. Eur Spine J 2012; 21 (8) 1580-1589
  • 2 Astur N, Klimo Jr P, Sawyer JR, Kelly DM, Muhlbauer MS, Warner Jr WC. Traumatic atlanto-occipital dislocation in children: evaluation, treatment, and outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (24) e194 (1–8)
  • 3 Finn M, Fassett DR, Apfelbaum RI. Surgical treatment of nonrheumatoid atlantoaxial degenerative arthritis producing pain and myelopathy. Spine 2007; 32 (26) 3067-3073
  • 4 Grob D, Schütz U, Plötz G. Occipitocervical fusion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (366) 46-53
  • 5 Wozasek GE, Wruhs O, Wagner M. Occipitocervical fusion in metastasis to the dens. [in German]. Unfallchirurgie 1988; 14 (6) 320-323
  • 6 Fehlings MG, Errico T, Cooper P, Benjamin V, DiBartolo T. Occipitocervical fusion with a five-millimeter malleable rod and segmental fixation. Neurosurgery 1993; 32 (2) 198-207 ; discussion 207–208
  • 7 Deutsch H, Haid Jr RW, Rodts Jr GE, Mummaneni PV. Occipitocervical fixation: long-term results. Spine 2005; 30 (5) 530-535
  • 8 Ahmed R, Traynelis VC, Menezes AH. Fusions at the craniovertebral junction. Childs Nerv Syst 2008; 24 (10) 1209-1224
  • 9 Caird J, Bolger C. Preoperative cervical traction in cases of cranial settling with halo ring and Mayfield skull clamp. Br J Neurosurg 2005; 19 (6) 488-489
  • 10 Collignon FP, Cohen-Gadol AA, Krauss WE. Circumferential decompression of the foramen magnum for the treatment of syringomyelia associated with basilar invagination. Neurosurg Rev 2004; 27 (3) 168-172
  • 11 Song GC, Cho KS, Yoo DS, Huh PW, Lee SB. Surgical treatment of craniovertebral junction instability: clinical outcomes and effectiveness in personal experience. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2010; 48 (1) 37-45
  • 12 Yüksel KZ, Crawford NR, Melton MS, Dickman CA. Augmentation of occipitocervical contoured rod fixation with C1-C2 transarticular screws. Spine J 2007; 7 (2) 180-187
  • 13 Schulz R, Macchiavello N, Fernández E , et al. Harms C1-C2 instrumentation technique: anatomo-surgical guide. Spine 2011; 36 (12) 945-950
  • 14 Nurick S. The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain 1972; 95 (1) 87-100
  • 15 Wackenheim A. Roentgen Diagnosis of the Cranio-Vertebral Region. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1977
  • 16 VanGilder JCMA, Dolan KD. The Craniovertebral Junction and Its Abnormalities. Mount Kisco, NY: Futura; 1987
  • 17 Benke M, Yu WD, Peden SC, O'Brien JR. Occipitocervical junction: imaging, pathology, instrumentation. Am J Orthop 2011; 40 (10) E205-E215
  • 18 Powers B, Miller MD, Kramer RS, Martinez S, Gehweiler Jr JA. Traumatic anterior atlanto-occipital dislocation. Neurosurgery 1979; 4 (1) 12-17
  • 19 Lu DC, Roeser AC, Mummaneni VP, Mummaneni PV. Nuances of occipitocervical fixation. Neurosurgery 2010; 66 (3, Suppl): 141-146
  • 20 Lee JH, Jahng TA, Chung CK. C1-2 transarticular screw fixation in high-riding vertebral artery: suggestion of new trajectory. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007; 20 (7) 499-504
  • 21 Botelho RV, Neto EB, Patriota GC, Daniel JW, Dumont PA, Rotta JM. Basilar invagination: craniocervical instability treated with cervical traction and occipitocervical fixation. Case report. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 7 (4) 444-449
  • 22 Peng X, Chen L, Wan Y, Zou X. Treatment of primary basilar invagination by cervical traction and posterior instrumented reduction together with occipitocervical fusion. Spine 2011; 36 (19) 1528-1531
  • 23 Simsek S, Yigitkanli K, Belen D, Bavbek M. Halo traction in basilar invagination: technical case report. Surg Neurol 2006; 66 (3) 311-314 ; discussion 314
  • 24 Goel A, Shah A. Reversal of longstanding musculoskeletal changes in basilar invagination after surgical decompression and stabilization. J Neurosurg Spine 2009; 10 (3) 220-227
  • 25 Rodgers WB, Coran DL, Emans JB, Hresko MT, Hall JE. Occipitocervical fusions in children. Retrospective analysis and technical considerations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (364) 125-133
  • 26 Landeiro JA, Boechat S, Christoph DdeH , et al. Transoral approach to the craniovertebral junction. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2007; 65 (4B) 1166-1171
  • 27 Mori Y, Takayasu M, Saito K, Seki Y, Shibuya M, Yoshida J. Benign osteoblastoma of the odontoid process of the axis: a case report. Surg Neurol 1998; 49 (3) 274-277
  • 28 Goel A, Pareikh S, Sharma P. Atlantoaxial joint distraction for treatment of basilar invagination secondary to rheumatoid arthritis. Neurol India 2005; 53 (2) 238-240
  • 29 Chandra PS, Kumar A, Chauhan A, Ansari A, Mishra NK, Sharma BS. Distraction, compression, and extension reduction of basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation: a novel pilot technique. Neurosurgery 2013; 72 (6) 1040-1053 ; discussion 1053
  • 30 Jian FZ, Chen Z, Wrede KH, Samii M, Ling F. Direct posterior reduction and fixation for the treatment of basilar invagination with atlantoaxial dislocation. Neurosurgery 2010; 66 (4) 678-687 ; discussion 687
  • 31 Sakou T, Kawaida H, Morizono Y, Matsunaga S, Fielding JW. Occipitoatlantoaxial fusion utilizing a rectangular rod. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (239) 136-144
  • 32 Klimo Jr P, Astur N, Gabrick K, Warner Jr WC, Muhlbauer MS. Occipitocervical fusion using a contoured rod and wire construct in children: a reappraisal of a vintage technique. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2013; 11 (2) 160-169
  • 33 Stock GH, Vaccaro AR, Brown AK, Anderson PA. Contemporary posterior occipital fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (7) 1642-1649
  • 34 Wang S, Wang C, Leng H, Zhao W, Yan M, Zhou H. Pedicle screw combined with lateral mass screw fixation in the treatment of basilar invagination and congenital C2-3 fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2013; ; November 4 (Epub ahead of print)
  • 35 Zipnick RI, Merola AA, Gorup J , et al. Occipital morphology. An anatomic guide to internal fixation. Spine 1996; 21 (15) 1719-1724 ; discussion 1729–1730
  • 36 Sutterlin III CE, Bianchi JR, Kunz DN, Zdeblick TA, Johnson WM, Rapoff AJ. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervical fixation devices. J Spinal Disord 2001; 14 (3) 185-192
  • 37 Caglar YS, Torun F, Pait TG, Hogue W, Bozkurt M, Ozgen S. Biomechanical comparison of inside-outside screws, cables, and regular screws, using a sawbone model. Neurosurg Rev 2005; 28 (1) 53-58
  • 38 Sribnick EA, Dadashev VY, Brahma B, Wrubel DM. The use of inside-outside screws for occipitocervical fusion in pediatric patients. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2012; 10 (5) 392-397
  • 39 Wills BP, Jencikova-Celerin L, Dormans JP. Cervical spine range of motion in children with posterior occipitocervical arthrodesis. J Pediatr Orthop 2006; 26 (6) 753-757
  • 40 Krag M. Biomechanics of the cervical spine. In: Frymoyer J, ed. The Adult Spine: Principles and Practice. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1991: 929-965
  • 41 Lindley TE, Dahdaleh NS, Menezes AH, Abode-Iyamah KO. Complications associated with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein use in pediatric craniocervical arthrodesis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2011; 7 (5) 468-474