Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1393312
Efficacy and safety of bovine activated factors IIa/VIIa/IXa/Xa in patients with active gastrointestinal bleeding: a proof of concept study
Publication History
submitted: 06 April 2015
accepted after revision: 30 August 2015
Publication Date:
12 November 2015 (online)
Background and study aims: Endoscopic treatment of active gastrointestinal bleeding often remains difficult, and considerable technical expertise is required. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic hemostasis with a liquid combination of bovine activated factors IIa/VIIa/IXa/Xa (SeraSeal).
Methods: Patients with active gastrointestinal bleeding were prospectively included. In group A, 5 mL of bovine activated factors IIa/VIIa/IXa/Xa was topically applied via catheters to the bleeding site as initial hemostasis; group B received a similar application but as rescue therapy after failure of conventional endoscopic hemostasis.
Results: In group A, bleeding was stopped by the agent in 15 /22 patients (68 %) and by conventional endoscopic hemostasis in 5 of the other 7, with coiling and surgery required for definitive hemostasis in 2. In group B, the addition of the agent definitively stopped bleeding in 13 /15 patients (87 %), with hemostasis in the remaining 2 achieved with fibrin glue. Rebleeding was observed in 1 patient.
Conclusions: Our proof of concept study suggests that the use of bovine activated factors IIa/VIIa/IXa/Xa might be a safe and effective addition to current endoscopic hemostatic strategies, but further studies are necessary.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02349490
-
References
- 1 Nahon S, Hagège H, Latrive JP et al. Groupe des Hémorragies Digestives Hautes de l’ANGH. Epidemiological and prognostic factors involved in upper gastrointestinal bleeding: results of a French prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 998-1008
- 2 Barkun AN, Bardou M, Kuipers EJ et al. International Consensus Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Conference Group. International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152: 101-113
- 3 Hwang JH, Fisher DA, Ben-Menachem T et al. Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. The role of endoscopy in the management of acute non-variceal upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 1132-1138
- 4 Sung JJ, Chan FK, Chen M et al. Asia-Pacific Working Group. Asia-Pacific Working Group consensus on non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Gut 2011; 60: 1170-1177
- 5 Sung JJ, Luo D, Wu JC et al. Early clinical experience of the safety and effectiveness of Hemospray in achieving hemostasis in patients with acute peptic ulcer bleeding. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 291-295
- 6 Huang R, Pan Y, Hui N et al. Polysaccharide hemostatic system for hemostasis management in colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc 2014; 26: 63-68
- 7 Beyazit Y, Köklü S, Akbal E et al. Successful treatment of endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced early hemorrhage with application of Ankaferd Blood Stopper. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 1325-1326
- 8 Granville-Chapman J, Jacobs N, Midwinter MJ. Pre-hospital haemostatic dressings: a systematic review. Injury 2011; 42: 447-459
- 9 Smith LA, Stanley AJ, Bergman JJ et al. Hemospray application in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: results of the Survey to Evaluate the Application of Hemospray in the Luminal Tract. J Clin Gastroenterol 2014; 48: e89-e92
- 10 Masci E, Arena M, Morandi E et al. Upper gastrointestinal active bleeding ulcers: review of literature on the results of endoscopic techniques and our experience with Hemospray. Scand J Gastroenterol 2014; 49: 1290-1295