Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) vs laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) for the treatment of Type III achalasia in 75 patients: a multicenter comparative study

Background and study aims: Type III achalasia is characterized by rapidly propagating pressurization attributable to spastic contractions. Although laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) is the current gold standard management for type III achalasia, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is conceivably superior because it allows for a longer myotomy. Our aims were to compare the efficacy and safety of POEM with LHM for type III achalasia patients.

Patients and methods: A retrospective study of 49 patients who underwent POEM for type III achalasia across eight centers were compared to 26 patients who underwent LHM at a single institution. Procedural data were abstracted and pre- and post-procedural symptoms were recorded. Clinical response was defined by improvement of symptoms and decrease in Eckardt stage to ≤ 1. Secondary outcomes included length of myotomy, procedure duration, length of hospital stay, and rate of adverse events.

Results: Clinical response was significantly more frequent in the POEM cohort (98.0 % vs 80.8 %; P = 0.01). POEM patients had significantly shorter mean procedure time than LHM patients (102 min vs 264 min; P < 0.01) despite longer length of myotomy (16 cm vs 8 cm; P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between POEM and LHM in the length of hospital stay (3.3 days vs 3.2 days; P = 0.68), respectively. Rate of adverse events was significantly less in the POEM group (6 % vs 27 %; P < 0.01).

Conclusions: POEM allows for a longer myotomy than LHM, which may result in improved clinical outcomes. POEM appears to be an effective and safe alternative to LHM in patients with type III achalasia.

• References

• 1 Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ et al. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24 (Suppl. 01) 57-65
• 2 Boeckxstaens G, Zaninotto G. Achalasia and esophago-gastric junction outflow obstruction: focus on the subtypes. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24 (Suppl. 01) 27-31
• 3 Moonen A, Boeckxstaens G. Current diagnosis and management of achalasia. J Clin Gastroenterol 2014; 48: 484-490
• 4 Patti MG, Pellegrini CA, Arcerito M et al. Comparison of medical and minimally invasive surgical therapy for primary esophageal motility disorders. Arch Surg 1995; 130: 609-615 ; discussion 615–616
• 5 Salvador R, Costantini M, Zaninotto G et al. The preoperative manometric pattern predicts the outcome of surgical treatment for esophageal achalasia. Journal of gastrointestinal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14: 1635-1645
• 6 Rohof WO, Salvador R, Annese V et al. Outcomes of treatment for achalasia depend on manometric subtype. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 718-725 ; quiz e713–714
• 7 Pasricha PJ, Hawari R, Ahmed I et al. Submucosal endoscopic esophageal myotomy: a novel experimental approach for the treatment of achalasia. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 761-764
• 8 Stavropoulos SN, Desilets DJ, Fuchs KH et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy white paper summary. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 2005-2019
• 9 Roman S, Kahrilas PJ. Management of spastic disorders of the esophagus. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2013; 42: 27-43
• 10 Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T et al. Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology 2008; 135: 1526-1533
• 11 Gockel I, Junginger T. The value of scoring achalasia: a comparison of current systems and the impact on treatment--the surgeon's viewpoint. Am Surg 2007; 73: 327-331
• 12 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
• 13 Eckardt AJ, Eckardt VF. Treatment and surveillance strategies in achalasia: an update. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 8: 311-319
• 14 Swanstrom LL, Kurian A, Dunst CM et al. Long-term outcomes of an endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: the POEM procedure. Ann Surg 2012; 256: 659-667
• 15 Ujiki MB, Yetasook AK, Zapf M et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: a short-term comparison with the standard laparoscopic approach. Surgery 2013; 154: 893-897 ; discussion 897-900
• 16 Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 265-271
• 17 Bortolotti M, Mari C, Lopilato C et al. Effects of sildenafil on esophageal motility of patients with idiopathic achalasia. Gastroenterology 2000; 118: 253-257
• 18 Vaezi MF, Pandolfino JE, Vela MF. ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 1238-1249 ; quiz 1250
• 19 Pratap N, Kalapala R, Darisetty S et al. Achalasia cardia subtyping by high-resolution manometry predicts the therapeutic outcome of pneumatic balloon dilatation. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 17: 48-53
• 20 Leconte M, Douard R, Gaudric M et al. Functional results after extended myotomy for diffuse oesophageal spasm. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 1113-1118
• 21 Teitelbaum EN, Rajeswaran S, Zhang R et al. Peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy produce a similar short-term anatomic and functional effect. Surgery 2013; 154: 885-891 ; discussion 891–892
• 22 Hungness ES, Teitelbaum EN, Santos BF et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 17: 228-235
• 23 Bhayani NH, Kurian AA, Dunst CM et al. A comparative study on comprehensive, objective outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy with per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia. Ann Surg 2014; 259: 1098-1103
• 24 Teitelbaum EN, Boris L, Arafat FO et al. Comparison of esophagogastric junction distensibility changes during POEM and Heller myotomy using intraoperative FLIP. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 4547-4555
• 25 Shiwaku H, Inoue H, Beppu R et al. Successful treatment of diffuse esophageal spasm by peroral endoscopic myotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 149-150
• 26 Khashab MA, Saxena P, Kumbhari V et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy as a platform for the treatment of spastic esophageal disorders refractory to medical therapy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 136-139
• 27 Minami H, Isomoto H, Yamaguchi N et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for diffuse esophageal spasm. Endoscopy 2014; 46: E79-81
• 28 Ren Z, Zhong Y, Zhou P et al. Perioperative management and treatment for complications during and after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia (EA) (data from 119 patients). Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 3267-3272
• 29 Stavropoulos SN, Modayil RJ, Friedel D et al. The International Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy Survey (IPOEMS): a snapshot of the global POEM experience. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 3322-3338
• 30 Von Renteln D, Fuchs KH, Fockens P et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: an international prospective multicenter study. Gastroenterology 2013; 145: 309-311 .e1-3
• 31 Huffmanm LC, Pandalai PK, Boulton BJ et al. Robotic Heller myotomy: a safe operation with higher postoperative quality-of-life indices. Surgery 2007; 142: 613-618 ; discussion 618–620
• 32 Khajanchee YS, Kanneganti S, Leatherwood AE et al. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy with Toupet fundoplication: outcomes predictors in 121 consecutive patients. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 827-833 ; discussion 833–824
• 33 Rawlings A, Soper NJ, Oelschlager B et al. Laparoscopic Dor vs Toupet fundoplication following Heller myotomy for achalasia: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized-controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 18-26