A Novel Method to Risk Stratify Patients Undergoing Exercise Stress Echocardiography Using a Set of Combined Criteria

Abstract

Background and Purposes A novel method using quantitative long-axis function and tissue Doppler in addition to wall motion analysis in exercise stress echocardiography was evaluated. We hypothesized that the novel criteria added additional accuracy in stress echocardiography.

Methods Patients with chest pain and at low-to-intermediate risk for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) were retrospectively studied. They underwent stress echocardiography with attention to wall motion abnormalities, left ventricular long-axis function, and tissue Doppler measurement.

Results The results showed that the combined novel criteria (i.e., classifying a case as positive if three out of the following four criteria were fulfilled: (1) abnormal segmental wall motion shortly after peak stress; (2) Ee wave after peak stress less than 10 cm/s and Ee/Aa ratio after peak stress less than 1; (3) Sm wave after peak stress less than 10.5 cm/s; (4) abnormal long-axis left ventricular function) offered a better accuracy for predicting obstructive CAD and future revascularization with a high sensitivity (100%) and high negative predictive value (100%) .

Conclusion From a practical standpoint, the combined novel criteria may be useful in improving the diagnostic accuracy of stress echocardiography.

Keywords

atherosclerosis - cardiovascular disease - coronary artery - hypercholesterolemia - hypertension - ischemia - PCI

• References

• 1 Fleischmann KE, Hunink MG, Kuntz KM, Douglas PS. Exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance. JAMA 1998; 280 (10) 913-920
• 2 Pellikka PA, Nagueh SF, Elhendy AA, Kuehl CA, Sawada SG ; American Society of Echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography. J Am SocEchocardiogr 2007; 20 (9) 1021-1041
• 3 Quiñones MA, Verani MS, Haichin RM, Mahmarian JJ, Suarez J, Zoghbi WA. Exercise echocardiography versus 201Tl single-photon emission computed tomography in evaluation of coronary artery disease. Analysis of 292 patients. Circulation 1992; 85 (3) 1026-1031
• 4 Armstrong WF, Zoghbi WA. Stress echocardiography: current methodology and clinical applications. J Am CollCardiol 2005; 45 (11) 1739-1747
• 5 Mishra MB, Lythall DA, Chambers JB. A comparison of wall motion analysis and systolic left ventricular long axis function during dobutamine stress echocardiography. Eur Heart J 2002; 23 (7) 579-585
• 6 Agarwal R, Gosain P, Kirkpatrick JN , et al. Tissue Doppler imaging for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2012; 10: 47
• 7 Mädler CF, Payne N, Wilkenshoff U , et al; Myocardial Doppler in Stress Echocardiography (MYDISE) Study Investigators. Non-invasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease by quantitative stress echocardiography: optimal diagnostic models using off-line tissue Doppler in the MYDISE study. Eur Heart J 2003; 24 (17) 1584-1594
• 8 Tobis J, Azarbal B, Slavin L. Assessment of intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory. J Am CollCardiol 2007; 49 (8) 839-848
• 9 Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD , et al. American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am CollCardiol 2001; 37 (5) 1478-1492