Hearing Aid Use and Adherence to Treatment in a Publicly-Funded Health Service from the City of São Paulo, Brazil

Abstract

Introduction Periodic follow-up appointments are important to ensure long-term effectiveness of rehabilitation with hearing aids. However, not all users are able to maintain adherence to recommendations prescribed during the fitting process and some do not attend those appointments, which compromises the effectiveness of treatment.

Objective Compare hearing aid use after 1 year between subjects who did not attend a follow-up evaluation appointment at a publicly-funded health service (nonattenders) and those who attended the appointment (attenders). Reasons for nonuse of hearing aids and unscheduled appointments were also analyzed.

Methods Prospective observational cross-sectional study. Nonattenders and attenders in a follow-up evaluation appointment were interviewed by telephone about hearing aid use, reasons for nonuse, and unscheduled appointments.

Results The nonattenders group consisted of 108 subjects and the attenders group had 200 subjects; in both groups, most users kept bilateral use but the nonuse rate was higher in nonattenders. The main reason for nonuse of hearing aids among nonattenders was health problems; fitting problems was the main reason for nonuse in the attenders group. Health problems and issues like unavailable companion and transportation difficulties were the reasons for unscheduled follow-up appointments.

Conclusion Nonattenders had a greater nonuse rate and were more likely to abandon hearing aid use. Measures to increase hearing aid use and adherence to prescribed recommendations are also necessary to ensure long-term effectiveness of rehabilitation with hearing aids.

Keywords

hearing aids - public health - patient compliance

• References

• 1 Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria MS/SAS n° 587, de 7 de outubro de 2004. Available at: http://www.saude.mg.gov.br/images/documentos/Portaria_587.pdf . Accessed February 11, 2014
• 2 World Health Organization. Guidelines for hearing aids and services for developing countries. 2nd ed. World Health Organization: Prevention of Blindness and Deafness (PBD); 2004 . Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2004/9241592435_eng.pdf . Accessed February 11, 2014
• 3 International Society of Audiology. Good practice guidance for adult hearing aid fittings and services—background to the document and consultation. 2005. Available at: http://www.icra.nu/papers/ISA_good_practice_guide_2_2.pdf . Accessed February 11, 2014
• 4 Goggins S, Day J. Pilot study: efficacy of recalling adult hearing-aid users for reassessment after three years within a publicly-funded audiology service. Int J Audiol 2009; 48 (4) 204-210
• 5 Iwahashi JH, Jardim IdeS, Bento RF. Results of hearing aids use dispensed by a publicly-funded health service. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 79 (6) 681-687
• 6 Cook JA, Hawkins DB. Outcome measurement for patients receiving hearing aid services. Laryngoscope 2007; 117 (4) 610-613
• 7 Armigliato ME, Prado DGA, Melo TM , et al. Avaliação de serviços de saúde auditiva sob a perspectiva do usuário: proposta de instrumento. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol 2010; 15 (1) 32-39
• 8 Haynes RB. Determinants of Compliance: The Disease and the Mechanics of Treatment. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press; 1979
• 9 Rand CS. Measuring adherence with therapy for chronic diseases: implications for the treatment of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol 1993; 72 (10) 68D-74D
• 10 World Health Organization. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. 2003. Available at: http://www.who.int/chp/knowledge/publications/adherence_full_report.pdf?ua=1 Accessed March 5, 2014
• 11 Gusmão JL, Mion Jr D. Adesão ao tratamento—conceitos. Rev Bras Hipertens. 2006; 13 (1) 23-25
• 12 Reiners AAO, Azevedo RCS, Vieira MA, de Arruda AL. Produção bibliográfica sobre adesão/não--adesão de pessoas ao tratamento de saúde. Cien Saude Colet 2008; 13 (2) (Suppl. 02) 2299-2306
• 13 Humes LE. Dimensions of hearing aid outcome. J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 10 (1) 26-39
• 14 Kochkin S. MarkeTrak V: “Why my hearing aids are in the drawer”: the consumers' perspective. Hear J 2000; 53 (2) 34-41
• 15 Humes LE, Wilson DL, Barlow NN, Garner CB, Amos N. Longitudinal changes in hearing aid satisfaction and usage in the elderly over a period of one or two years after hearing aid delivery. Ear Hear 2002; 23 (5) 428-438
• 16 Kochkin S. MarkeTrak VIII: Consumer satisfaction with hearing aids is slowly increasing. Hear J 2010; 63 (1) 19-32
• 17 Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH, Li W. Applied Linear Statistical Models. 4th ed. Chicago, IL: McGraw-Hill/Irwin; 1996
• 18 Davis AC, Mencher GT. Proceedings of the International Binaural Symposium, Manchester, United Kingdom, October 2005. Int J Audiol 2006; 45 (Suppl. 01) S1-S124
• 19 Bevilacqua MC, Melo TM, Morettin M, Lopes AC. A avaliação de serviços em Audiologia: concepções e perspectivas. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol 2009; 14 (3) 421-426
• 20 Bertoli S, Staehelin K, Zemp E, Schindler C, Bodmer D, Probst R. Survey on hearing aid use and satisfaction in Switzerland and their determinants. Int J Audiol 2009; 48 (4) 183-195
• 21 Lupsakko TA, Kautiainen HJ, Sulkava R. The non-use of hearing aids in people aged 75 years and over in the city of Kuopio in Finland. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2005; 262 (3) 165-169
• 22 Jerram JC, Purdy SC. Technology, expectations, and adjustment to hearing loss: predictors of hearing aid outcome. J Am Acad Audiol 2001; 12 (2) 64-79