Download PDF
Semin Plast Surg 2014; 28(3): 130-137
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1384808
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

A Functional Aesthetic Approach to Correcting the Sequelae of Sagittal Synostosis

Eric H. Hubli
1   Department of Craniofacial Reconstruction, Cook Children's Hospital, Fort Worth, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 September 2014 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Sagittal synostosis is the most commonly treated form of craniosynostosis exhibiting an incidence of 1:5000 births.1 Early closure of the sagittal suture is the cause of the classic phenotypic presentation of an elongated head, which is characterized by a narrow and low occiput, a saddle-shaped parietal region, and noticeable frontal bossing. Early surgical intervention is the treatment of choice and surgical options range from simple suture excision to total cranial vault remodeling. Noting that a significant proportion of patients present with limited frontal bossing and asymmetry that is more pronounced in the posterior cranium, the author developed the functional aesthetic approach to reconstruction. This operative technique addresses the changes noted in the posterior two-thirds of the cranial vault, completely correcting the sequelae associated with early closure of the sagittal suture. As an added advantage, the reconstructive paradigm is designed to create a dynamic temporal-occipital component that will activate when a child rests in the supine position. This enhances widening of the posterior cranium thus improving long-term results.

Keywords

craniosynostosis - occipital - parietal - sagittal - suture - scaphocephaly - temporal
 

  • References

  • 1 Lajeunie E, Le Merrer M, Bonaïti-Pellie C, Marchac D, Renier D. Genetic study of scaphocephaly. Am J Med Genet 1996; 62 (3) 282-285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Jabs EW, Lewanda AF. Craniosynostosis. In: Rimoin DL, Pyeritz RE, Korf BR, , eds. Emery & Rimoin's Principles and Practice of Medical Genetics. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2013. Chap. 144, 1-34
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Nellhaus G. Head circumference from birth to eighteen years. Practical composite international and interracial graphs. Pediatrics 1968; 41 (1) 106-114
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Vu HL, Panchal J, Parker EE, Levine NS, Francel P. The timing of physiologic closure of the metopic suture: a review of 159 patients using reconstructed 3D CT scans of the craniofacial region. J Craniofac Surg 2001; 12 (6) 527-532
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Faber HK, Towne EB. Early craniectomy as a preventive measure in oxycephaly and allied conditions with special reference to the prevention of blindness. . Am J Med Sci 1927; 173: 701-711
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Matson DD. Surgical treatment of congenital anomalies of the coronal and metopic sutures. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1960; 17 (3) 413-417
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Vicari FA, Zukowski M, Endoscopic assisted craniofacial surgery. In: Marchac D. , ed. Craniofacial Surgery 6. Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of the International Society of Craniofacial Surgery. Bologna, Italy: Monduzzi Editore; 1995: 77-81
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Jimenez DF, Barone CM. Endoscopic craniectomy for early surgical correction of sagittal craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 1998; 88 (1) 77-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Barone CM, Jimenez DF. Endoscopic craniectomy for early correction of craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (7) 1965-1973 , discussion 1974–1975
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Marchac D, Renier D, Broumand S. Timing of treatment for craniosynostosis and facio-craniosynostosis: a 20-year experience. Br J Plast Surg 1994; 47 (4) 211-222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 McCarthy JG, Epstein F, Sadove M, Grayson B, Zide B. Early surgery for craniofacial synostosis: an 8-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73 (4) 521-533
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 McDermott MW, Steinbok P, Cochrane DD. Keyhole craniectomy for correction of sagittal synostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 1989; 5 (1) 50-51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Windh P, Davis C, Sanger C, Sahlin P, Lauritzen C. Spring-assisted cranioplasty vs pi-plasty for sagittal synostosis—a long term follow-up study. J Craniofac Surg 2008; 19 (1) 59-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Greensmith AL, Furneaux C, Rees M, de Chalain T. Cranial compression by reverse distraction: a new technique for correction of sagittal synostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (4) 979-985
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Komuro Y, Yanai A, Hayashi A, Nakanishi H, Miyajima M, Arai H. Cranial reshaping employing distraction and contraction in the treatment of sagittal synostosis. Br J Plast Surg 2005; 58 (2) 196-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lauritzen CG, Davis C, Ivarsson A, Sanger C, Hewitt TD. The evolving role of springs in craniofacial surgery: the first 100 clinical cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (2) 545-554
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Maltese G, Tarnow P, Lauritzen CG. Spring-assisted correction of hypotelorism in metopic synostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (3) 977-984
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Forrest CR. Advances in Craniofacial Surgery. Presented at: Mayo Clinic Symposium in Reconstructive Surgery, May 31–June 3, 2012; Rochester, MN
    PubMedGoogle Scholar