Sympathectomy versus Sympathicotomy in Palmar Hyperhidrosis Comparing T3 Ablation

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare thoracoscopic sympathectomy and sympathicotomy at the third ganglia (T3) level for the treatment of primary palmar hyperhidrosis in terms of initial surgery results, complications, and patient satisfaction.

Materials and Methods Two groups of patient underwent T3 thoracoscopic sympathectomy and thoracoscopic sympathicotomy under general anesthesia using single-lung ventilation via a double-lumen endotracheal tube by the same surgical team for the treatment of severe primary palmar hyperhidrosis or a combination of levels for multiarea between 2008 and 2013. The groups were homogeneous for relevant demographic, physiological, and clinical data. All patients were examined preoperatively and were followed up at 6 months postoperatively. In both groups, patient's satisfaction was evaluated 6 months after surgery by a detailed interview and scored into three grades (1 = very satisfied, 2 = satisfied, and 3 = dissatisfied).

Results No operative mortality, major intraoperative complication, infections, and Horner syndrome were recorded. There was no treatment failure. The average time of operation was 50 minutes for Group A (sympathectomy) and 36 minutes for Group B (sympathicotomy). Compensatory sweating occurred in 40 patients (89% for Group A and 85.11% for Group B) with a different accumulation of the severity degree. The satisfaction rate was 91.11% for Group A and 93.61% for Group B.

Conclusion There was no significant difference between thoracoscopic sympathectomy and sympathicotomy at the third ganglia (T3) level for the treatment of primary palmar hyperhidrosis in terms of initial surgery results, complications, and patient satisfaction. Neither surgical technique is better than the other one for palmar hyperhidrosis treatment. Development of severe compensatory sweating and postoperative pain are major determinant factors of patient dissatisfaction. Sympathicotomy should be preferred for palmar hyperhidrosis treatment, as it is much technically shorter, simpler to implement, and also easier to learn.

Keywords

hyperhidrosis - sympathectomy - compensatory sweating

• References

• 1 Li X, Tu Y-R, Lin M, Lai F-C, Chen J-F, Dai Z-J. Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis: a randomized control trial comparing T3 and T2-4 ablation. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85 (5) 1747-1751
• 2 Montessi J, Almeida EP, Vieira JP, Abreu MdaM, Souza RL, Montessi OV. Video-assisted thoracic sympathectomy in the treatment of primary hyperhidrosis: a retrospective study of 521 cases comparing different levels of ablation. J Bras Pneumol 2007; 33 (3) 248-254
• 3 Yano M, Fujii Y. Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 12 (2) 81-82
• 4 Moya J, Ramos R, Vives N , et al. Compensatory sweating after upper thoracic sympathectomy. Prospective study of 123 cases [in Spanish]. Arch Bronconeumol 2004; 40 (8) 360-363
• 5 Baumgartner FJ, Reyes M, Sarkisyan GG, Iglesias A, Reyes E. Thoracoscopic sympathicotomy for disabling palmar hyperhidrosis: a prospective randomized comparison between two levels. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92 (6) 2015-2019
• 6 Proebstle TM, Schneiders V, Knop J. Gravimetrically controlled efficacy of subcorial curettage: a prospective study for treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis. Dermatol Surg 2002; 28 (11) 1022-1026
• 7 Heckmann M, Ceballos-Baumann AO, Plewig G ; Hyperhidrosis Study Group. Botulinum toxin A for axillary hyperhidrosis (excessive sweating). N Engl J Med 2001; 344 (7) 488-493
• 8 Goldman A. Treatment of axillary and palmar hyperhidrosis with botulinum toxin. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2000; 24 (4) 280-282
• 9 Yazbek G, Wolosker N, de Campos JR, Kauffman P, Ishy A, Puech-Leão P. Palmar hyperhidrosis—which is the best level of denervation using video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy: T2 or T3 ganglion?. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42 (2) 281-285
• 10 Weksler B, Luketich JD, Shende MR. Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy: at what level should you perform surgery?. Thorac Surg Clin 2008; 18 (2) 183-191
• 11 Ro KM, Cantor RM, Lange KL, Ahn SS. Palmar hyperhidrosis: evidence of genetic transmission. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35 (2) 382-386
• 12 Hehir DJ, Brady MP. Long-term results of limited thoracic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. J Pediatr Surg 1993; 28 (7) 909-911
• 13 O'Riordain DS, Maher M, Waldron DJ, O'Donovan B, Brady MP. Limiting the anatomic extent of upper thoracic sympathectomy for primary palmar hyperhidrosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993; 176 (2) 151-154
• 14 Ueyama T, Ueyama K, Ueyama K, Matsumoto Y. Thoracoscopic sympathetic surgery for hand sweating. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 10 (1) 4-8
• 15 Dumont P, Denoyer A, Robin P. Long-term results of thoracoscopic sympathectomy for hyperhidrosis. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78: 1801-1807
• 16 Doolabh N, Horswell S, Williams M , et al. Thoracoscopic sympathectomy for hyperhidrosis: indications and results. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77 (2) 410-414 , discussion 414
• 17 Lesèche G, Castier Y, Thabut G , et al. Endoscopic transthoracic sympathectomy for upper limb hyperhidrosis: limited sympathectomy does not reduce postoperative compensatory sweating. J Vasc Surg 2003; 37 (1) 124-128
• 18 Gossot D, Toledo L, Fritsch S, Célérier M. Thoracoscopic sympathectomy for upper limb hyperhidrosis: looking for the right operation. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64 (4) 975-978
• 19 Lin TS, Fang HY. Transthoracic endoscopic sympathectomy in the treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis—with emphasis on perioperative management (1,360 case analyses). Surg Neurol 1999; 52 (5) 453-457
• 20 Yano M, Kiriyama M, Fukai I , et al. Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis: efficacy of T2 and T3 ganglion resection. Surgery 2005; 138 (1) 40-45
• 21 de Campos JR, Kauffman P, Werebe EdeC , et al. Quality of life, before and after thoracic sympathectomy: report on 378 operated patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76 (3) 886-891