Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography for the Study of Lymphatic System in Lymphedema

Abstract

Background Imaging of the lymphatic system is difficult because of its structural and anatomical characteristics, and the conventional diagnostic method, radionuclide-based imaging, has the disadvantage of poor resolution. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has been shown the capability of depicting lymphatic channels in lymphedema recently. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the imaging of MR lymphangiography (MRL) in diagnosis of limb lymphedema and its possible role in the microsurgical management of lymphedema.

Methods A total of 710 patients with primary lymphedema (n = 378), secondary lymphedema (n = 332), were enrolled in the study. Contrast-enhanced lymphangiography was performed with 3.0 T MR unit (Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands) after intracutaneously injection of gadobenate dimeglumine. Kinetic of enhanced lymph flow within lymphatics and lymph nodes as well as the morphological abnormalities of lymphatic system were evaluated.

Results MRL was able to display the detailed anatomical changes in the vessels and nodes. In primary lymphedema, there are three major types of lymphatic system malformation: (1) only lymph nodes affected, (2) only lymph vessels affected, and (3) both lymph vessels and lymph nodes affected. In secondary lymphedema MRL clearly demonstrated tortuous and dilated collecting lymphatics in lymphedemtous limbs. MRL also provided information concerning the functional status of lymph transport in lymphatic vessels and nodes by real-time visualization of enhanced lymph flow in lymphatic channels and within lymph nodes.

Conclusion Contrast MRL was capable of evaluating the anatomical and functional status of lymphatic vessels and lymph nodes in lymphedematous limb. This new imaging shows good potential for use in the diagnosis and surgical management of lymphedema.

Keywords

lymphedema - MR lymphangiography - lymphatic - lymph node

• References

• 1 Foldi E, Foldi M. Lymphostatic diseases. In: Foldi M, Foldi E, Kubik S, eds. Textbook of Lymphology. München: Elsevier GmbH; 2003: 231-318
• 2 Szuba A, Shin WS, Strauss HW, Rockson S. The third circulation: radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy in the evaluation of lymphedema. J Nucl Med 2003; 44 (1) 43-57
• 3 Silvestri RC, Huseby JS, Rughani I, Thorning D, Culver BH. Respiratory distress syndrome from lymphangiography contrast medium. Am Rev Respir Dis 1980; 122 (4) 543-549
• 4 Liu N, Wang C, Sun M. Noncontrast three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging vs lymphoscintigraphy in the evaluation of lymph circulation disorders: A comparative study. J Vasc Surg 2005; 41 (1) 69-75
• 5 Barrett T, Choyke PL, Kobayashi H. Imaging of the lymphatic system: new horizons. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 2006; 1 (6) 230-245
• 6 Liu NF, Lu Q, Wang CG, Zhou JG. Magnetic resonance imaging as a new method to diagnose protein losing enteropathy. Lymphology 2008; 41 (3) 111-115
• 7 Dayan JH, Dayan E, Kagen A , et al. The use of magnetic resonance angiography in vascularized groin lymph node transfer: an anatomic study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (1) 41-45
• 8 Liu NF, Lu Q, Jiang ZH, Wang CG, Zhou JG. Anatomic and functional evaluation of the lymphatics and lymph nodes in diagnosis of lymphatic circulation disorders with contrast magnetic resonance lymphangiography. J Vasc Surg 2009; 49 (4) 980-987
• 9 Liu NF, Lu Q, Yan ZX. Lymphatic malformation is a common component of Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52 (6) 1557-1563
• 10 Liu NF, Lu Q, Liu PA, Wu XF, Wang BS. Comparison of radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy and dynamic magnetic resonance lymphangiography for investigating extremity lymphoedema. Br J Surg 2010; 97 (3) 359-365
• 11 Liu NF, Yan ZX, Wu XF. Classification of lymphatic-system malformations in primary lymphoedema based on MR lymphangiography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012; 44 (3) 345-349
• 12 Liu N, Yan Z, Lu Q, Wang C. Diagnosis of inguinal lymph node metastases using contrast enhanced high resolution MR lymphangiography. Acad Radiol 2013; 20 (2) 218-223