Download PDF
Zentralbl Chir 2014; 139(6): 600-606
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1383245
Übersicht
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Der Stellenwert der minimalinvasiven Chirurgie bei der Behandlung der Leistenhernie und Pylorusstenose

The Significance of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Treatment of Inguinal Hernia and Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis
O. J. Muensterer
1   Division of Pediatric Surgery, Childrenʼs Hospital at Montefiore, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America
2   Klinik und Poliklinik für Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg Universität, Mainz, Deutschland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 December 2014 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

See also:

Der Stellenwert der minimalinvasiven Chirurgie bei der Behandlung der Leistenhernie und PylorusstenoseZentralbl Chir 2015; 140(04): 456-456
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1546086

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Die Leistenhernienkorrektur und die Pyloromyotomie sind 2 der häufigsten Operationen im Kindesalter. In den letzten 2 Jahrzehnten wurde eine zunehmende Anzahl dieser Eingriffe minimalinvasiv durchgeführt. Diese Übersichtsarbeit beschreibt die Entwicklung der laparoskopischen Technik dieser beiden Indikationen zusammen mit dem jeweiligen aktuellen Stellenwert. Material und Methoden: Eine systematische Analyse der kinderchirurgischen Literatur seit 1990 wurde für die laparoskopische Operation der Leistenhernie und der hypertrophen Pylorusstenose durchgeführt. Relevante Publikationen wurden zusammengefasst. Ergebnisse: Die erste laparoskopische Pyloromyotomie wurde im Jahr 1991, die erste Leistenhernienkorrektur bei Kindern 1998 beschrieben. Die Lernkurve für beide Eingriffe ist zunächst steil und erreicht erst nach etwa 20–30 Operationen ein Plateau. Zum Vergleich der laparoskopischen mit der offenen Technik wurden bislang sowohl für die Pyloromyotomie wie auch für die Leistenhernienkorrektur mehrere randomisierte kontrollierte Studien und Metaanalysen publiziert. Die Vorteile der laparoskopischen gegenüber der offenen Pyloromyotomie sind die frühere Rekonvaleszenz und kürzere postoperative Verweildauer bei gleicher Komplikationsrate. Im Falle der laparoskopischen Leistenhernienkorrektur ist die Operationszeit nur bei bilateralem Vorgehen kürzer als bei der offenen Technik, während die Komplikationsrate wiederum vergleichbar ist. Allerdings treten nach einem laparoskopischen Eingriff im Intervall weniger kontralaterale Leistenhernien auf. Schlussfolgerung: Die laparoskopische Pyloromyotomie und die laparoskopische Leistenhernienoperation im Kindesalter erfordern spezielle operative Fähigkeiten. Mindestens die ersten 20 Eingriffe sollten daher unter kompetenter Anleitung durchführt werden. Neben dem subjektiven Nutzen einer kleineren Narbe haben beide Verfahren konkrete Vorteile gegenüber dem offenen Vorgehen bei gleicher Komplikationsrate. Daher können diese Eingriffe derzeit durchaus als Goldstandard betrachtet werden.

Abstract

Background: Inguinal hernia repair and pyloromyotomy are among the most common operations performed on children. In the last two decades minimally invasive surgery has been employed for an increasing number of these procedures. This review describes the development of the techniques involved, and their current role in therapy. Material and Methods: A systematic review of the paediatric surgical literature since 1990 was performed on laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and pyloromyotomy. Relevant publications were summarised. Results: The first laparoscopic pyloromyotomy was described in 1991, the first laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children was published in 1998. The learning curve for both procedures is initially steep and reaches a plateau only after about 20 to 30 cases. Both randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses are available comparing the laparoscopic and open techniques for both procedures. The advantages of laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy include faster recovery and shorter hospital stay, at similar complication rates. The operation times of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair are shorter in bilateral cases, while the complication rate again is similar. However, the incidence of metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia is lower after laparoscopic repair. Conclusion: Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy and paediatric inguinal hernia repair require special skills. As a minimum, a surgeonʼs first 20 cases should therefore be performed under competent supervision. Besides resulting in smaller scars, both procedures have concrete advantages and the same complication rates compared to the open techniques. Therefore, both operations can be regarded as the current gold standard.

Schlüsselwörter

Laparoskopie - Pyloromyotomie - Leistenhernie - Lernkurve - Metaanalyse

Key words

laparoscopy - pyloromyotomy - inguinal hernia - learning curve - meta-analysis
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Pan ML, Chang WP, Lee HC et al. A longitudinal cohort study of incidence rates of inguinal hernia repair in 0- to 6-year-old children. J Pediatr Surg 2013; 48: 2327-2331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 MacMahon B. The continuing enigma of pyloric stenosis of infancy: a review. Epidemiology 2006; 17: 195-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ramstedt C. Zur Operation der angeborenen Pylorousstenose. Med Klin 1912; 8: 1702-1705
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ferguson AH. Oblique inguinal hernia-typic operation for its radical cure. JAMA 1899; 33: 6-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Alain JL, Grousseau D, Terrier G. Extramucosal pyloromyotomy by laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 1991; 5: 174-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Schier F. Laparoscopic surgery of inguinal hernias in children–initial experience. J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35: 1331-1335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Esposito C, Montupet P. Laparoscopic treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia in children. Pediatr Surg Int 1998; 14: 182-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Zani A, Eaton S, Hoellwarth M et al. Management of pediatric inguinal hernias in the era of laparoscopy: results of an international survey. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2014; 24: 9-13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cosper GH, Menon R, Hamann MS et al. Residency training in pyloromyotomy: a survey of 331 pediatric surgeons. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43: 102-108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mullassery D, Perry D, Goyal A et al. Surgical practice for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in the United Kingdom and Ireland – a survey of members of the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43: 1227-1229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Muensterer OJ, Woller T, Metzger R et al. Ökonomie der kontralateralen laparoskopischen Leistenexploration. Chirurg 2008; 79: 1065-1071
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kokorowski PJ, Wang HH, Routh JC et al. Evaluation of the contralateral inguinal ring in clinically unilateral inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 2014; 18: 311-324
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Chan KL, Hui WC, Tam PK. Prosepective randomized single-center, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic vs. open repair of pediatric inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 927-932
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Koivusalo AI, Korpela R, Wirtavouri K et al. A single-blinded, randomized comparison of laparoscopic versus open hernia repair in children. Pediatrics 2009; 123: 332-337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Shalaby R, Ismail M, Dorgham A et al. Laparoscopic hernia repair in infancy and childhood: evaluation of 2 different techniques. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45: 2210-2216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Shalaby R, Ibrahem R, Shahin M et al. Laparoscopic hernia repair versus open herniotomy in children: a controlled randomized study. Minim Invasive Surg 2012; 2012: 484135
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Alzahem A. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal herniotomy in infants and children: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 2011; 27: 605-612
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Yang C, Zhang H, Pu J et al. Laparoscopic vs. open herniorrhaphy in the management of pediatric inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 2011; 46: 1824-1834
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lukong CS. Surgical techniques of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in childhood: a critical appraisal. J Surg Tech Case Report 2012; 4: 1-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Turial S, Saied A, Schier F. Microlaparoscopic hernia repair in children: initial experiences. Surg Innov 2011; 18: 368-372
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Becmeur F, Philippe P, Lemandat-Schultz A et al. A continuous series of 96 laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children by a new technique. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 1738-1741
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Giseke S, Glass M, Tapadar P et al. A true laparoscopic herniotomy in children. Evaluation of long term outcome. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2010; 20: 191-194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Shalaby R, Ismail M, Samaha A et al. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair; experience with 874 children. J Pediatr Surg 2014; 49: 460-464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Muensterer OJ, Georgeson KE. Multimedia manuscript: inguinal hernia repair by single-incision pediatric endosurgery (SIPES) using the hydrodissection-lasso technique. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 3438-3439
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kellnar S. Die perkutane laparoskopische Leistenbruchkorrektur beim Kind. Zentralbl Chir 2009; 134: 542-544
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Ozgediz D, Roayaie K, Lee H et al. Subcutaneous endoscopically assisted ligation (SEAL) of the internal ring for repair of inguinal hernia in children: report of a new technique and early results. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 1327-1331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lipskar AM, Soffer SZ, Glick RD et al. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia inversion and ligation in female children: a review of 173 consecutive cases at a single institution. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45: 1370-1374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Guner YS, Emami CN, Chokshi NK et al. Inversion herniotomy: a laparoscopic technique for female inguinal hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2010; 20: 481-484
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Riquelme M, Aranda A, Riquelme QM. Laparoscopic pediatric inguinal hernia repair: no ligation, just resection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2010; 20: 77-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Turial S, Kreutz M, Häusser S et al. CD rats as an animal model in the experimental study of laparoscopic hernia repair. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2010; 20: 330-333
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Kozlov Y, Novogilov V, Rasputin A et al. Laparoscopic inguinal preperitoneal injection–novel technique for inguinal hernia repair: preliminary results of experimental study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2012; 22: 276-279
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Bertozzi M, Melissa B, Magrini E et al. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in the pediatric age group: what about the learning curve?. J Endourol 2013; 27: 840-844
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Mishra PK, Burnand K, Minocha A et al. Incarcerated inguinal hernia management in children: ‘a comparison of the open and laparoscopic approach’. Pediatr Surg Int 2014; 30: 621-624
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Parelkar SV, Oak S, Bachani MK et al. Laparoscopic repair of pediatric inguinal hernia–is vascularity of the testis at risk? A study of 125 testes. J Pediatr Surg 2011; 46: 1813-1816
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 St Peter SD, Holcomb GW, Calcins CM et al. Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg 2006; 244: 363-370
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Leclair MD, Plattner V, Mirallie E et al. Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42: 692-698
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Hall NJ, Pacilli M, Eaton S et al. Recovery after open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a double-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009; 373: 390-398
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Siddiqui S, Heidel RE, Angel CA et al. Pyloromyotomy: randomized control trial of laparoscopic vs. open technique. J Pediatr Surg 2012; 47: 93-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Hall NJ, Van Der Zee J, Tan HL et al. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 774-778
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Jia WQ, Tian JH, Yang KH et al. Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 2011; 21: 77–81. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2011; 21: 77-81
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Oomen MW, Hoekstra LT, Bakx R et al. Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on major complications. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 2104-2110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Thomas PG, Sharp NE, St Peter SD. Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy: comparing the arthrotomy knife to the Bovie blade. J Surg Res 2014; 190: 251-254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Ford WD, Crameri JA, Holland AJ. The learning curve for laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. J Pediatr Surg 1997; 32: 552-554
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Kim SS, Lau ST, Lee SL et al. The learning curve associated with laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2005; 15: 474-477
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Oomen MW, Hoekstra LT, Bakx R et al. Learning curves for pediatric laparoscopy: how many operations are enough? The Amsterdam experience with laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 1829-1833
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Oomen M, Bakx R, Peeters B et al. Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy, the tail of the learning curve. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 3705-3709
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Carrington EV, Hall NJ, Pacilli MJ et al. Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy. Surg Res 2012; 178: 315-320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Lee SL, Sydorak RM, Lau ST. Laparoscopic contralateral groin exploration: is it cost effective?. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45: 793-795
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Haricharan RN, Aprahamian CJ, Morgan TL et al. Smaller scars – what is the big deal: a survey of the perceived value of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43: 92-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Muensterer OJ, Adibe OO, Harmon CM et al. Single-incision laparoscopic pyloromyotomy: initial experience. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 1589-1593
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Turial S, Enders J, Schier F. Microlaparoscopic pyloromyotomy in children: initial experiences with a new technique. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 266-270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Ibarguen-Secchia E. Endoscopic pyloromyotomy for congenital pyloric stenosis. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 598-600
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Chaves DM, Gusmon CC, Mestieri LH et al. A new technique for performing endoscopic pyloromyotomy by gastric submucosal tunnel dissection. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2014; 24: e92-e94
    PubMedGoogle Scholar