Synlett 2015; 26(05): 661-665
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1379614
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Synthesis of β,β-Disubstituted γ-Butyrolactones by Chemo­selective Oxidation of 1,4-Diols and γ-Hydroxy Olefins with RuCl3/NaIO4

Rong Gao
Temple University School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Moulder Center for Drug Discovery Research, 3307 N Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA   Fax: +1(215)7075620   Email: canney@temple.edu
,
Rong Fan
Temple University School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Moulder Center for Drug Discovery Research, 3307 N Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA   Fax: +1(215)7075620   Email: canney@temple.edu
,
Daniel J. Canney*
Temple University School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Moulder Center for Drug Discovery Research, 3307 N Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA   Fax: +1(215)7075620   Email: canney@temple.edu
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 29 September 2014

Accepted after revision: 03 November 2014

Publication Date:
07 January 2015 (online)


Abstract

Substituted γ-butyrolactones represent an important group of structural fragments commonly found in natural products, receptor ligands, and drug molecules. Interest in preparing a library of substituted γ-butyrolactones and finding that limited routes to β-substituted lactones exist, led to the development of an efficient approach for the synthesis of β,β-disubstituted γ-butyrolactones. Readily prepared substituted 1,4-diols and γ-hydroxy olefins were treated with the ­RuCl3/NaIO4 oxidation system to provide the target β,β-disubstituted γ-butyrolactones in modest to good yields. The reaction goes through a lactol intermediate that was isolated and characterized for selected compounds. The approach supplies an efficient and versatile method for the synthesis of these important heterocyclic structures. Importantly, the present work is the first report that demonstrates the ability of RuCl3/NaIO4 to selectively oxidize primary hydroxyl groups in the presence of secondary alcohols to prepare lactones in good yields.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

    • 1a Gil S, Parra M, Rodriguez P, Segura J. Mini-Rev. Org. Chem. 2009; 6: 345
    • 1b Seitz M, Reiser O. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2005; 9: 285
  • 3 Doyle MP, Dyatkin AB. J. Org. Chem. 1995; 60: 3035
  • 4 Suzuki T, Morita K, Tsuchida M, Hiroi K. Org. Lett. 2002; 4: 2361
  • 5 Kayser MM, Morand P. Can. J. Chem. 1978; 56: 1524
    • 6a Gao R, Canney DJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 5914
    • 6b Ahungena A, Canney DJ. Med. Chem. Res. 2005; 14: 404
    • 6c Ahungena A, Gabriel JL, Canney DJ. Med. Chem. Res. 2003; 12: 481
    • 7a Smith CR, RajanBabu TV. J. Org. Chem. 2009; 74: 3066
    • 7b Milne C, Powell A, Jim J, Nakeeb MA, Smith CP, Micklefield J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 11250
    • 7c Yang D, Zhang C. J. Org. Chem. 2001; 66: 4814
    • 8a Genet JP, Pons D, Juge S. Synth. Commun. 1983; 4: 413
    • 8b Bo Y, Singh S, Duong HQ, Cao C, Sieburth SM. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 1787
    • 8c Terada M, Toda Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 6354
    • 8d Miller MJ, Walz AJ, Zhu H, Wu C, Moraski G, Möllmann U, Tristani EM, Crumbliss AL, Ferdig MT, Checkley L, Edwards RL, Boshof HI. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 2076
    • 8e Kim YJ, Wang P, Navarro-Villalobos M, Rohde BD, Derryberry J, Gin DY. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 11906
  • 9 Arnone A, Bravo P, Frigerio M, Mele A, Vergani B, Viani F. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999; 2149
  • 10 Senanayake C, Larsea RD, Bill TJ, Liu J, Corley EG, Reider PJ. Synlett 1994; 199
  • 11 Zimmermann F, Meux E, Mieloszynski J, Lecuireb J, Oget N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005; 46: 3201
  • 12 The formation of keto acids is observed based on LC–MS analysis of the reaction mixture.
  • 13 Hansen TM, Florence GJ, Lugo-Mas P, Chen J, Abrams JN, Forsyth CJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003; 44: 57
  • 14 General Procedure for 6a–6f: To a stirred mixture of γ-hydroxy olefins (3a3f, 3.16 mmol), RuCl3 stock solution [(4.51 mL, 0.035 M in H2O), MeCN (81 mL) and distilled H2O (9 mL), NaIO4 (4.06 g, 18.96 mmol)] was added in portions over a period of 30 min at r.t. The suspension was allowed to stir at r.t. overnight. The reaction was quenched with sat. aq solution of Na2S2O3 and the two layers were separated. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 100 mL). The combined organic layer was washed with brine, dried over anhyd MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography to give desired aldehyde product (silica gel, EtOAc–hexanes, 0–25%). 2-Oxaspiro[4.4]nonan-3-one (6a): colorless oil, yield: 72%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 4.10 (s, 2 H), 2.44 (s, 2 H), 1.69 (m, J = 5.2, 2.5 Hz, 8 H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 177.2, 78.6, 47.7, 41.4, 36.9, 24.4. General Procedure for 7a–7i: To a stirred mixture of 1,4-diols (3.16 mmol), RuCl3 stock solution [(4.51 mL, 0.035 M in H2O), MeCN (81 mL) and distilled H2O (9 mL), NaIO4 (4.06 g, 18.96 mmol)] was added in portions over a period of 30 min at r.t. The suspension was allowed to stir at r.t. overnight. The reaction was quenched with sat. aq solution of Na2S2O3 and the two layers were separated. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 100 mL). The combined organic layer was washed with brine, dried over anhyd MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography to give the desired aldehyde product (silica gel, EtOAc–hexanes: 0–25%). 5-Methyl-4,4-diphenyldihydrofuran-2(3H)-one (7a): colorless semisolid, yield: 81%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.13–7.32 (m, 6 H), 7.05–7.13 (m, 2 H), 6.94 (m, 2 H), 5.34 (q, J = 6.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.41 (d, J = 16.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.88 (d, J = 16.9 Hz, 1 H), 1.06 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 175.3, 145.1, 142.1, 129.0, 128.6, 128.1, 127.4, 127.3, 127.1, 82.4, 55.5, 43.0, 17.9. HRMS (CI): m/z [M + H] calcd for C17H16O2: 253.1229; found: 253.1225.