Suchttherapie 2015; 16(01): 27-35
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1374625
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Substanzmissbrauchsmuster von Universitätsstudierenden: Regionale und Geschlechtsdifferenzen

Substance Abuse Patterns among University Students: Regional and Gender Differences
A. Unger
1   Universitätsklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Universität Wien
,
L. Brandt
2   Zentrum für Public Health, Medizinische Universität Wien
,
A. Matznetter
1   Universitätsklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Universität Wien
,
C. Zachbauer
1   Universitätsklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Universität Wien
,
G. Fischer
2   Zentrum für Public Health, Medizinische Universität Wien
,
R. Jagsch
3   Institut für Angewandte Psychologie: Gesundheit, Entwicklung und Förderung, Fakultät für Psychologie, Universität Wien
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 June 2014 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Studierende unterliegen einem besonders hohen Risiko für Substanzmissbrauch. Epidemiologische Daten über regionale und geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede bezüglich Substanzmissbrauchsmuster sind nur begrenzt vorhanden.

Design: Standardisierte Erfassung von Prävalenzen, ohne Intervention.

Setting: Die Daten wurden an Universitäten in Wien (Stadt) erhoben und mit Daten, die in gleicher Weise und in identen Studienrichtungen an Universitäten in Innsbruck (Land) erhoben wurden, verglichen.

Teilnehmer: Von Mai bis Oktober 2010 wurden Daten von städtischen Studierenden (n=1025; mittleres Alter: 21,03 Jahre; 62,7% weiblich) erhoben. Diese wurden mit Daten von ländlichen Studierenden aus einer Vorstudie (2006) verglichen (n=873; mittleres Alter: 22,14 Jahre; 65,9% weiblich).

Fragebögen: Anamnesefragebogen zum Sub­stanzkonsum, Fagerström-Test (Nikotinabhängigkeit), CAGE-Test (Alkoholscreening), SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand, Beck-Depres­sions-Inventar, Zerssen-Beschwerdenliste (subjektive physische und psychische Beschwerden).

Ergebnisse: Ein hervorstechendes Ergebnis war die hohe Prävalenz des Nikotinkonsums (38,2%), wobei eine signifikant höhere Rate von täglichem Nikotinkonsum bei ländlichen Studierenden (p≤0,001) verglichen mit städtischen gefunden wurde. 32,4% der Männer und 21,4% der Frauen zeigten Zeichen einer Alkoholabhängigkeit mit weiterem Abklärungsbedarf im CAGE-Test. 18,5% aller Studierenden berichteten Cannabiskonsum, 9,9% täglich. Männer berichteten signifikant häufiger täglichen Alkoholkonsum (p≤0,001) und täglichen Cannabiskonsum (p=0,007) als Frauen. 6,2% der Studierenden berichteten über den Konsum von Benzodiazepinen. 35,4% aller Studierenden konsumierten Analgetika, wobei die Prävalenz bei Frauen signifikant höher war als bei Männern (p≤0,001).

Schlussfolgerung: Das Ausmaß des schädlichen Alkohol- und Nikotinkonsums in dieser Population ist beträchtlich. Signifikante Geschlechtsunterschiede bestehen. Besonders Alkoholabhängigkeit und die nicht-verordnete Einnahme von verschreibungspflichtigen Medikamenten sollten vermehrt in den Fokus von geschlechtssensitiven Gesundheitsinterventionen für Studierende rücken.

Abstract

Aims: University students are at particular risk for substance abuse behaviours. Epidemiological data on regional and gender differences in substance abuse patterns among this population is very limited.

Design: Non-interventional epidemiological self-report assessment.

Setting: Data were collected at the University of Vienna (urban) and compared to data collected in the same manner for a prior study at the University of Innsbruck (rural).

Participants: The investigational period at Vienna University lasted from May 2010 to October 2010. These data collected from urban students (n=1 025; mean age: 21.03 years; 62.7% female) were compared to data from a rural University student sample (n=873; mean age: 22.14 years; 65.9% female) which had been collected for a prior study (2006).

Measurements: Substance consumption history questionnaire, Fagerström test (nicotine dependence), CAGE test (alcoholism screening), SF-36 Health Survey, Beck-Depression-Inventory, Zerssen-Beschwerdenliste (German questionnaire on subjective physical and psychological ailments).

Findings: The most striking result was the high prevalence of nicotine consumption (38.2%), at which rural students had a significantly higher rate of daily nicotine use (p≤0.001) than the urban group. 32.4% of men and 21.4% of women screened positively on the CAGE tool indicating further need for evaluation of alcohol dependence. 18.5% of all students reported cannabis consumption, 9.9% daily. Males had significantly higher rates of daily alcohol (p≤0.001) and daily cannabis use (p=0.007) than females. 6.2% of all students reported taking benzodiazepines. 35.4% of all students consumed analgetics, women significantly more prevalently (p≤0.001) than men.

Conclusions: The magnitude of alcohol and nicotine abuse among this population is profound. Gender differences were significant. Particularly alcohol dependence and non-medical prescription drug use should be a focus of student health interventions using gender sensitive approaches.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Baumann A, Phongsavan P. Epidemiology of substance use in adolescence: prevalence, trends and policy implications. Drug Alcohol Depend 1999; 55: 187-207
  • 2 Melchior M, Chastang JF, Goldberg P et al. High prevalence rates of tobacco, alcohol and drug use in adolescents and young adults in France: Results from the GAZEL Youth study. Addictive Behaviors 2008; 33: 122-133
  • 3 Karam E, Kypri K, Salamoun M. Alcohol use among college students: an international perspective. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 2007; 20: 213-221
  • 4 Tosevski DL, Milovancevic MP, Gajic SD. Personality and psychopathology of university students. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2010; 23: 48-52
  • 5 O’Malley PM, Johnston LD. Epidemiology of Alcohol and Other Drug Use among American College Students. J Stud Alcohol 2002; 14: 23-39
  • 6 Ilhan IÖ, Yildirim F, Demirbas H et al. Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of substance use in a university-student sample in Turkey. Int J Public Health 2009; 54: 40-44
  • 7 Bethesda MD. What do these students have in common?. NIH Pub 2000; 00-4266
  • 8 Carrasco-Garrido P, Jimènez-Garcia R, Barrera VH et al. Predictive factors of self-medicated drug use among the Spanish adult population. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2008; 17: 193-199
  • 9 Sung HE, Richter L, Vaughan R. Nonmedical use of prescription opioids among teenagers in the United States: trends and correlates. Adolesc Health 2005; 27: 44-51
  • 10 Figueiras A, Caamano F, Gestal-Otero JJ. Sociodemographic factors related to self-medication in Spain. Eur J Epidemiol 2005; 16: 9-26
  • 11 Dhanookdhary AM, Gomez AM, Khan R et al. Substance Use among University Students at the St Augustine Campus of The University of the West Indies. West Indian Med J 2010; 59: 641
  • 12 Giacomuzzi S, Stempfl E, Stempfl-Al-Jazrawi K et al. Drug consumption among university students in Austria. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2008; 120: 188
  • 13 Cranford JA, Eisenberg D, Serras AM. Substance use behaviors, mental health problems and use of mental health services in a probability sample of college students. Addictive Behaviors 2009; 34: 134-145
  • 14 Kaloyanides K, McCabe S, Cranford J et al. Prevalence of Illicit Use and Abuse of Prescription Stimulants, Alcohol, and Other Drugs Among College Students: Relationship with Age at Initiation of Prescription Stimulants. Pharmacotherapy 2007; 27: 666-674
  • 15 Webb E, Ashton CH, Kelly P et al. Alcohol and drug use in UK university students. Lancet 1996; 348: 922-925
  • 16 Stein KV, Rieder A, Dorner T. East-West gradient in cardio-vascular mortality in Austria: how much can we explain by following the pattern of risk factors?. International J Health Geographics 2011; 10: 59
  • 17 Schober E, Rami B, Kirchengast S et al. Recent trend in overweight and obesity in male adolescents in Austria: a population-based study. Europ J Pediatr 2006; 166: 709-714
  • 18 Greenfield SF, Back SE, Lawson K et al. Substance Abuse in Women. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2010; 33: 339-355
  • 19 Fischer G, Eder H. Interdisciplinary therapeutic approaches with substance abusers taking into consideration gender differences. Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 1999; 149: 331-336
  • 20 Compton WM, Thomas YF, Stinson FS et al. Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV drug abuse and dependence in the United States: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007; 64: 566-576
  • 21 Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG et al. Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2006: Volume II, College students and adults ages 19–45. NIH Publication 2007; 07-6206
  • 22 Griffin MJ, Read JP. Prospective Effects of Method of Coercion in Sexual Victimization across the First College Year. J Interpers Violence 2012; 27: 2503-2524
  • 23 Nelson TF, Xuan Z, Lee H et al. Persistence of heavy drinking and ensuing consequences at heavy drinking colleges. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2009; 70: 726-734
  • 24 Presley CA, Pimentel ER. The introduction of the heavy and frequent drinker: a proposed classification to increase accuracy of alcohol assessments in postsecondary educational settings. J Stud Alcohol 2006; 67: 324-331
  • 25 Olesen J, Gustavson A, Svensson M et al. The economic cost of brain disorders in Europe. Eur J Neurol 2012; 19: 155-162
  • 26 Effertz T, Mann K. The burden and cost of disorders of the brain in Europe with the inclusion of harmful alcohol use and nicotine addiction. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2013; 23: 742-748
  • 27 Mundt M, Zakletskaia L. Prevention for College Students Who Suffer Alcohol-Induced Blackouts Could Deter High-Cost Emergency Department Visits. Health Aff 2012; 31: 863-870
  • 28 Heatherton TF, Kozlowski L, Frecker RC et al. The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: A revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Ques­tionnaire. Br J Addict 1991; 86: 1119-1127
  • 29 Ewing J. Detecting Alcoholism: The CAGE Questionnaire. JAMA 1984; 252: 1905-1907
  • 30 Bullinger M, Kirchberger I. SF-36. Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1998
  • 31 Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M et al. An Inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry 1961; 4: 561-571
  • 32 Von Zerssen D. Die Beschwerden-Liste. Parallelformen B-L und B-L`, Ergänzungsbogen L-L°. Manual. Weinheim: Beltz Test GmbH; 1976
  • 33 Hagman BT, Cohn AM. Drinking correlates of DSM-IV alcohol use disorder diagnostic orphans in college students. Am J Addict 2012; 21: 233-242
  • 34 Gledhill-Hoyt J, Lee H, Strote J et al. Increased use of marijuana and other illicit drugs at US colleges in the 1990s: results of three national surveys. Addiction 2000; 95: 1655-1667
  • 35 Wilsnack R, Sharon W, Wilsnack C et al. Gender and Alcohol consumption: Patterns from the multinational GENACIS project. Addiction 2009; 104: 1487-1500
  • 36 Devaud LL, Prendergast MA. Introduction to the special issue of Alcohol and Alcoholism on sex/gender differences in responses to alcohol. Alcohol Alcohol 2009; 44: 533-534
  • 37 Lyons AC, Willott SA. Alcohol consumption, gender identities and women’s changing social positions. Sex Roles 2008; 59: 694-712
  • 38 Day K, Gough B, McFadden M. Warning alcohol can seriously damage your feminine health. Feminist Media Studies 2004; 4: 165-183
  • 39 Ng M, Freeman MK, Fleming TD et al. Smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption in 187 countries, 1980–2012. JAMA 2014; 311: 183-192
  • 40 Kapusta N, Ramskogler K, Herlting I et al. Epidemiology of Substance Use in a Representative Sample of 18-year-old males. Alcohol Alcohol 2006; 41: 188-192
  • 41 Saladin ME, Gray KM, Carpenter MJ et al. Gender differences in craving and cue reactivity to smoking and negative affect/stress cues. Am J Addict 2012; 21: 210-220
  • 42 National Institute on Drug Abuse. Prescription Medications. Drug pages. Verfügbar unter http://www.nida.nih.gov/drugpages/prescrip­tion.html abgerufen am 04.03.2013
  • 43 Wagner FA, Anthony JC. Male-female differences in the risk of progression from first use to dependence upon cannabis, cocaine, and alcohol. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007; 86: 191-198
  • 44 Lynch WJ, Roth ME, Carroll ME. Biological basis of sex differences in drug abuse: Preclinical and clinical studies. Psychopharmacology 2002; 164: 121-137
  • 45 Simoni-Wastila L, Ritter G, Strickler G. Gender and other factors associated with the nonmedical use of abusable prescription drugs. Subst Use Misuse 2004; 39: 1-23
  • 46 Simoni-Wastila L, Strickler G. Risk Factors associated with Problem Use of Prescription Drugs. Am J Public Health 2004; 94: 266-268
  • 47 Fillingim RB. Sex, gender, and pain: Women and men really are different. Curr Rev Pain 2000; 4: 24-30
  • 48 Arria M, Cladeira K, O’Grady K et al. Drug Exposure Opportunities and Use Patterns among College Students: Results of a Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study. Substance Abuse 2008; 29: 19-38
  • 49 Vidourek R, King K, Knopf E. Non-Medical Prescription Drug Use among University Students. Am J Health Education 2010; 41: 345-352
  • 50 Kessler RC. Epidemiology of women and depression. J Affect Disord 2003; 74: 5-13
  • 51 Zhan W, Shaboltas AV, Skochilov RV et al. Gender differences in the relationship between alcohol use and depressive symptoms in St. Petersburg, Russia. J Addict Res Ther 2012; 3: 1000124
  • 52 Boden JM, Fegusson DM. Alcohol and depression. Addiction 2011; 106: 906-914
  • 53 Cooper M, Russell ML, Skinner JB et al. Development and validation of a three-dimensional measure of drinking motives. Psychol Assess 1992; 4: 123-133
  • 54 OEBIG-Reitox Focal Point Austria . Bericht zur Drogensituation 2009. Wien: OEBIG; 2009
  • 55 Wittchen HU, Jacobi F, Rehm J et al. The size and burden of mental disorders and other disorders of the brain in Europe in 2010. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2011; 21: 655-679