J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2014; 75(04): 221-224
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1373656
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Lateral Suboccipital Retrosigmoid Approach with Tentorial Incision for Petroclival Meningiomas: Technical Note

Hitoshi Yamahata
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan
,
Hiroshi Tokimura
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan
,
Kazuho Hirahara
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Kagoshima City Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan
,
Takeshi Ishii
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Kagoshima City Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan
,
Masanao Mori
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan
,
Ryosuke Hanaya
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan
,
Kazunori Arita
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

28 January 2011

28 March 2012

Publication Date:
02 May 2014 (online)

Abstract

Introduction The resection of petroclival meningiomas presents great neurosurgical challenges. Although multiple surgical approaches have been developed, the retrosigmoid route tends to be used to address tumors that are predominantly located in the posterior fossa. Our modification of the lateral suboccipital retrosigmoid approach with the placement of a tentorial incision yields good visualization of the supratentorial part of the tumor around the midbrain.

Methods We treated four patients, one with primary and three with recurrent petroclival meningioma, by our modified approach. After lateral suboccipital craniotomy, the infratentorial part of the tumor was removed after detaching it from the tentorial surface. The cerebellar tentorium was then carefully incised from the supracerebellar angle, taking care not to damage the superior cerebellar artery and trochlear nerve.

Results The operative field surrounding the midbrain was widened by this procedure, and safe dissection of the tumor from the brainstem and other neurovascular structures was performed with direct observation of the interface.

Conclusions Our approach is a useful modification of the retrosigmoid approach to petroclival meningiomas. It facilitates the safe resection of the supratentorial part of the tumor in the ambient cistern behind the tentorium.

 
  • References

  • 1 Couldwell WT, Fukushima T, Giannotta SL, Weiss MH. Petroclival meningiomas: surgical experience in 109 cases. J Neurosurg 1996; 84 (1) 20-28
  • 2 Samii M, Tatagiba M, Carvalho GA. Resection of large petroclival meningiomas by the simple retrosigmoid route. J Clin Neurosci 1999; 6 (1) 27-30
  • 3 al-Mefty O, Ayoubi S, Smith RR. The petrosal approach: indications, technique, and results. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1991; 53: 166-170
  • 4 Bricolo AP, Turazzi S, Talacchi A, Cristofori L. Microsurgical removal of petroclival meningiomas: a report of 33 patients. Neurosurgery 1992; 31 (5) 813-828 ; discussion 828
  • 5 Goel A, Muzumdar D. Conventional posterior fossa approach for surgery on petroclival meningiomas: a report on an experience with 28 cases. Surg Neurol 2004; 62 (4) 332-338 ; discussion 338–340
  • 6 Mastronardi L, Sameshima T, Ducati A, De Waele LF, Ferrante L, Fukushima T. Extradural middle fossa approach. Proposal of a learning method: the “rule of two fans.” Technical note. Skull Base 2006; 16 (3) 181-184
  • 7 Tahara A, de Santana Jr PA, Calfat Maldaun MV , et al. Petroclival meningiomas: surgical management and common complications. J Clin Neurosci 2009; 16 (5) 655-659
  • 8 Siwanuwatn R, Deshmukh P, Figueiredo EG, Crawford NR, Spetzler RF, Preul MC. Quantitative analysis of the working area and angle of attack for the retrosigmoid, combined petrosal, and transcochlear approaches to the petroclival region. J Neurosurg 2006; 104 (1) 137-142
  • 9 Hayashi N, Kurimoto M, Nagai S, Sato H, Hori S, Endo S. Tentorial incision in a lateral-medial direction with minimal retraction of the temporal lobe in the subtemporal transtentorial approach to the middle tentorial incisural space. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2008; 51 (6) 340-344
  • 10 Ammirati M, Bernardo A, Musumeci A, Bricolo A. Comparison of different infratentorial-supracerebellar approaches to the posterior and middle incisural space: a cadaveric study. J Neurosurg 2002; 97 (4) 922-928
  • 11 Seoane E, Rhoton Jr AL. Suprameatal extension of the retrosigmoid approach: microsurgical anatomy. Neurosurgery 1999; 44 (3) 553-560
  • 12 Koerbel A, Kirschniak A, Ebner FH, Tatagiba M, Gharabaghi A. The retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach to posterior cavernous sinus: microsurgical anatomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009; 35 (4) 368-372
  • 13 Samii M, Tatagiba M, Carvalho GA. Retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach to Meckel's cave and the middle fossa: surgical technique and outcome. J Neurosurg 2000; 92 (2) 235-241