Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2014; 35(13): 1124-1129
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1372636
Orthopedics & Biomechanics
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Influence of the Breathing Action on Net Drag Force Production in Front Crawl Swimming

D. Formosa
1   University of the Sunshine Coast, School of Health & Sports Science, Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering School of Health & Sports Science, Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, Sunshine Coast, Australia
,
M. G. L. Sayers
2   School of Health and Sport Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, Australia
,
B. Burkett
3   Faculty of Science, Health and Education, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, Australia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 13 February 2014

Publication Date:
10 July 2014 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective:

20 elite swimmers completed a total of 6 randomized net drag force trials in 2 conditions (i) 3 breathing and (ii) 3 non-breathing. Net drag force was measured using an assisted motorized dynamometer device mounted upon a Kistler force-platform. The male participants demonstrated no statistical differences in stroke rates between breathing and non-breathing trials. Female participants, however, demonstrated a statistical difference stroke rate. The male participants demonstrated that the breathing action caused a greater (26%) net drag force compared to the females (16%). To further understand the influence of breathing on swimming technique, each stroke was analyzed and comparisons were made between the breathing and non-breathing conditions. The male participants demonstrated a similar minimum net drag force when comparing the breathing and non-breathing conditions. Analysis showed that minimum net drag force and maximum net drag force for the males changed when integrating the breathing action, while female participants demonstrated similar swimming technique, regardless of condition or stroke.

Key words

biomechanics - breathing - non-breathing - stroke rate - swimmers
 

  • References

  • 1 Barbosa TM, Bragada JA, Reis VM, Marinho DA, Carvalho C, Silva AJ. Energetics and biomechanics as determining factors of swimming performance: updating the state of the art. J Sci Med Sport 2010; 13: 262-269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Berger MA, de Groot G, Hollander AP. Hydrodynamic drag and lift forces on human hand/arm models. J Biomech 1995; 28: 125-133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bixler B, Pease D, Fairhurst F. The accuracy of computational fluid dynamics analysis of the passive drag of a male swimmer. Sports Biomech 2007; 6: 81-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Castro F, Guimaraes A. Front crawl kinematics: breathing and pace acute effects. Port J Sport Sci 2006; 6: 26-28
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Clarys JP, Jiskoot J. Total resistance of selected body positions in the front crawl. In: Lewillie L, Clarys JP. editors. Swimming II. Baltimore, Md: University Park Press; 1975: 110-117
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Costa MJ, Bragada JA, Marinho DA, Silva AJ, Barbosa TM. Longitudinal interventions in elite swimming: a systematic review based on energetics, biomechanics, and performance. J Strength Cond Res 2012; 26: 2006-2016
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Counsilman JE. Forces in swimming two types of crawl stroke. Res Q 1955; 26: 127-139
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Di Prampero PE, Pendergast DR, Wilson DW, Rennie DW. Energetics of swimming in man. J Appl Physiol 1974; 37: 1-5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Formosa D, Mason B, Burkett B. The force-time profile of elite front crawl swimmers. J Sports Sci 2011; 29: 811-819
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Formosa DP, Sayers MG, Burkett B. Front-crawl stroke-coordination and symmetry: a comparison between timing and net drag force protocols. J Sports Sci 2013; 31: 759-766
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Fulton SK, Pyne D, Burkett B. Optimizing kick rate and amplitude for Paralympic swimmers via net force measures. J Sports Sci 2011; 29: 381-387
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Girold S, Calmels P, Maurin D, Milhau N, Chatard J. Assisted and resisted sprint training in swimming. J Strength Cond Res 2006; 20: 547-554
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2014 update. Int J Sports Med 2013; 34: 1025-1028
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hollander AP, De Groot G, Van Ingen Schenau GJ, Toussaint HM, De Best H, Peeters W, Meulemans A, Schreurs AW. Measurement of active drag during crawl arm stroke swimming. J Sports Sci 1986; 4: 21-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hopkins WG. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med 2000; 30: 1-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kolmogorov SV, Duplishcheva OA. Active drag, useful mechanical power output and hydrodynamic force coefficient in different swimming strokes at maximal velocity. J Biomech 1992; 25: 311-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lerda R, Cardelli C. Breathing and propelling in crawl as a function of skill and swim velocity. Int J Sports Med 2003; 24: 75-80
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lerda R, Cardelli C, Chollet D. Analysis of the interaction between breathing and arm actions in the front crawl. J Hum Mov Sci 2001; 40: 129-144
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Maglischo EW, Maglischo CW, Zier DJ, Santos TR. The effect of sprint-assisted and sprint-resisted swimming on stroke mechanics. J Swim Res 1985; 1: 27-33
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Marinho DA, Reis VM, Alves FB, Vilas-Boas JP, Machado L, Silva AJ, Rouboa AI. The hydrodynamic drag during the gliding in swimming. J Appl Biomech 2009; 25: 253-257
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Payton CJ, Bartlett RM, Baltzopoulos V, Coombs R. Upper extremity kinematics and body roll during preferred-side breathing and breath-holding front crawl swimming. J Sports Sci 1999; 17: 689-696
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Psycharakis SG, McCabe C. Shoulder and hip roll differences between breathing and non-breathing conditions in front crawl swimming. J Biomech 2011; 44: 1752-1756
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Schleihauf RE. ed A hydrodynamic analysis of swimming propulsion. International Symposium on Biomechanics in Swimming. Baltimore, MD: University Press; 1979
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Schnitzler C, Seifert L, Chollet D. Variability of coordination parameters at 400-m front crawl swimming pace. J Sports Sci Med 2009; 8: 203-310
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Seifert L, Boulesteix L, Chollet D. Effect of gender on the adaptation of arm coordination in front crawl. Int J Sports Med 2004; 25: 217-223
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Seifert L, Chehensse A, Tourny-Chollet C, Lemaitre F, Chollet D. Effect of breathing patterns on arm coordination symmetry in front crawl. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22: 1670-1676
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Seifert L, Chollet D, Allard P. Arm coordination symmetry and breathing effect in front crawl. Hum Mov Sci 2005; 24: 234-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Seifert L, Chollet D, Rouard A. Swimming constraints and arm coordination. Hum Mov Sci 2007; 26: 68-86
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Toussaint H, Beek P. Biomechanics of competitive front crawl swimming. Sports Med 1992; 13: 8-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Toussaint H, Truijens M. Biomechanical aspects of peak performance in human swimming. Anim Biol 2005; 55: 17-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Vezos N, Gourgoulis V, Aggeloussis N, Kasimatis P, Christoforidis C, Mavromatis G. Underwater stroke kinematics during breathing and breath-holding front crawl swimming. J Sports Sci Med 2007; 6: 58-62
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Winter D. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. New Yorks: Wiley & Sons; 1990
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Yeater RA, Martin RB, White MK, Gilson KH. Tethered swimming forces in the crawl, breast and back strokes and their relationship to competitive performance. J Biomech 1981; 14: 527-537
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar