Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1371522
Endoscopic Endonasal Transclival Approaches: Case Series and Outcomes for Different Clival Regions
Publication History
27 November 2013
15 December 2013
Publication Date:
17 April 2014 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/jnlsb/201404/lookinside/thumbnails/10.1055-s-0034-1371522-1.jpg)
Abstract
Objective Transclival endoscopic endonasal approaches to the skull base are novel with few published cases. We report our institution's experience with this technique and discuss outcomes according to the clival region involved.
Design Retrospective case series.
Setting Tertiary care academic medical center
Participants All patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal transclival approaches for skull base lesions from 2008 to 2012.
Main Outcome Measures Pathologies encountered, mean intraoperative time, intraoperative complications, gross total resection, intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, postoperative CSF leak, postoperative complications, and postoperative clinical course.
Results A total of 49 patients underwent 55 endoscopic endonasal transclival approaches. Pathology included 43 benign and 12 malignant lesions. Mean follow-up was 15.4 months. Mean operative time was 167.9 minutes, with one patient experiencing an intraoperative internal carotid artery injury. Of the 15 cases with intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, 1 developed postoperative CSF leak (6.7%). There were six other postoperative complications: four systemic complications, one case of meningitis, and one retropharyngeal abscess. Gross total resection was achieved for all malignancies approached with curative intent.
Conclusions This study provides evidence that endoscopic endonasal transclival approaches are a safe and effective strategy for the surgical management of a variety of benign and malignant lesions.
Level of Evidence 4.
-
References
- 1 Solares CA, Fakhri S, Batra PS, Lee J, Lanza DC. Transnasal endoscopic resection of lesions of the clivus: a preliminary report. Laryngoscope 2005; 115 (11) 1917-1922
- 2 Mortini P, Roberti F, Kalavakonda C, Nadel A, Sekhar LN. Endoscopic and microscopic extended subfrontal approach to the clivus: a comparative anatomical study. Skull Base 2003; 13 (3) 139-147
- 3 Crumley RL, Gutin PH. Surgical access for clivus chordoma. The University of California, San Francisco, experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 115 (3) 295-300
- 4 Carrabba G, Dehdashti AR, Gentili F. Surgery for clival lesions: open resection versus the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach. Neurosurg Focus 2008; 25 (6) E7
- 5 Fraser JF, Nyquist GG, Moore N, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal minimal access approach to the clivus: case series and technical nuances. Neurosurgery 2010; 67 (3, Suppl Operative): ons150-ons158 ; discussion ons158
- 6 Raper DMS, Komotar RJ, Fraser JF, Anand VK, Moore N, Schwartz TH. Skull base chordomas: endonasal endoscopic transclival approach. In: Hayat M, , ed. Astrocytoma, Medulloblastoma, Retinoblastoma, Chordoma, Craniopharyngioma, Oligodendroglioma, and Ependymoma. New York, NY: Springer; 2012: 185-194 . Tumors of the Central Nervous System; vol 8
- 7 Fraser JF, Nyquist GG, Moore N, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal transclival resection of chordomas: operative technique, clinical outcome, and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 2010; 112 (5) 1061-1069
- 8 Koutourousiou M, Gardner PA, Tormenti MJ , et al. Endoscopic endonasal approach for resection of cranial base chordomas: outcomes and learning curve. Neurosurgery 2012; 71 (3) 614-624 ; discussion 624–625
- 9 Hong Jiang W, Ping Zhao S, Hai Xie Z, Zhang H, Zhang J, Yun Xiao J. Endoscopic resection of chordomas in different clival regions. Acta Otolaryngol 2009; 129 (1) 71-83
- 10 Saito K, Toda M, Tomita T, Ogawa K, Yoshida K. Surgical results of an endoscopic endonasal approach for clival chordomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012; 154 (5) 879-886
- 11 Cavallo LM, Cappabianca P, Messina A , et al. The extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the clivus and cranio-vertebral junction: anatomical study. Childs Nerv Syst 2007; 23 (6) 665-671
- 12 Frank G, Sciarretta V, Calbucci F, Farneti G, Mazzatenta D, Pasquini E. The endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal approach for the treatment of cranial base chordomas and chondrosarcomas. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (1) (Suppl. 01) ONS50-ONS57 ; discussion ONS50–ONS57
- 13 Kassam AB, Gardner P, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Carrau RL. Expanded endonasal approach: fully endoscopic, completely transnasal approach to the middle third of the clivus, petrous bone, middle cranial fossa, and infratemporal fossa. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19 (1) E6
- 14 Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part I. Crista galli to the sella turcica. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19 (1) E3
- 15 Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part II. Posterior clinoids to the foramen magnum. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19 (1) E4
- 16 Burkart CM, Theodosopoulos PV, Keller JT, Zimmer LA. Endoscopic transnasal approach to the clivus: a radiographic anatomical study. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (9) 1672-1678
- 17 Goravalingappa R, Han JC, Mangiardi J, Levenson M. Endoscopic/Microscopic approach to sphenopetroclival complex: an anatomical study. Skull Base Surg 1999; 9 (1) 33-39
- 18 Kassam AB, Vescan AD, Carrau RL , et al. Expanded endonasal approach: vidian canal as a landmark to the petrous internal carotid artery. J Neurosurg 2008; 108 (1) 177-183
- 19 Singh A, Germanwala AV. Management of postoperative complications of skull base surgery. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 22 (3) 237-245
- 20 Liu JK, Schmidt RF, Choudhry OJ, Shukla PA, Eloy JA. Surgical nuances for nasoseptal flap reconstruction of cranial base defects with high-flow cerebrospinal fluid leaks after endoscopic skull base surgery. Neurosurg Focus 2012; 32 (6) E7