Download PDF
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2015; 76(01): 66-71
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1371512
Technical Note
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Thoracic Spine Localization Using Preoperative Placement of Fiducial Markers and Subsequent CT. A Technical Report

Amjad Nasr Anaizi
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
,
Christopher Kalhorn
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
,
Michael McCullough
2   Department of Radiology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
,
Jean-Marc Voyadzis
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
,
Faheem A. Sandhu
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

30 August 2012

03 January 2014

Publication Date:
21 July 2014 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Study Design A retrospective case series evaluating the use of fiducial markers with subsequent computed tomography (CT) or CT myelography for intraoperative localization.

Objective To evaluate the safety and utility of preoperative fiducial placement, confirmed with CT myelography, for intraoperative localization of thoracic spinal levels.

Summary of Background Data Thoracic spine surgery is associated with serious complications, not the least of which is the potential for wrong-level surgery. Intraoperative fluoroscopy is often used but can be unreliable due to the patient's body habitus and anatomical variation.

Methods Sixteen patients with thoracic spine pathology requiring surgical intervention underwent preoperative fiducial placement at the pedicle of the level of interest in the interventional radiology suite. CT or CT myelogram was then done to evaluate fiducial location relative to the level of pathology. Surgical treatment followed at a later date in all patients.

Results All patients underwent preoperative fiducial placement and CT or CT myelography, which was done on an outpatient basis in 14 of the 16 patients. Intraoperatively, fiducial localization was easily and quickly done with intraoperative fluoroscopy leading to correct localization of spinal level in all cases. All patients had symptomatic improvement following surgery. There were no complications from preoperative localization or operative intervention.

Conclusions Preoperative placement of fiducial markers confirmed with a CT or CT myelogram allows for reliable and fast intraoperative localization of the spinal level of interest with minimal risks and potential complications to the patient. In most cases, a noncontrast CT should be sufficient. This should be an equally reliable means of localization while further decreasing potential for complications. CT myelography should be reserved for pathology that is not evident on noncontrast CT. Accuracy of localization is independent of variations in rib number or vertebral segmentation. The technique is a safe, reliable, and rapid means of localizing spinal level during surgery.

Keywords

spine localization - thoracic discectomy - thoracic spine - wrong level - surgery - thoracic disc
 

  • References

  • 1 Mody MG, Nourbakhsh A, Stahl DL, Gibbs M, Alfawareh M, Garges KJ. The prevalence of wrong level surgery among spine surgeons. Spine 2008; 33 (2) 194-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hanson EH, Mishra RK, Chang DS , et al. Sagittal whole-spine magnetic resonance imaging in 750 consecutive outpatients: accurate determination of the number of lumbar vertebral bodies. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 12 (1) 47-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Singh H, Meyer SA, Hecht AC, Jenkins III AL. Novel fluoroscopic technique for localization at cervicothoracic levels. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009; 22 (8) 615-618
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Nowitzke A, Wood M, Cooney K. Improving accuracy and reducing errors in spinal surgery—a new technique for thoracolumbar-level localization using computer-assisted image guidance. Spine J 2008; 8 (4) 597-604
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Rosahl SK, Gharabaghi A, Liebig T, Feste CD, Tatagiba M, Samii M. Skin markers for surgical planning for intradural lesions of the thoracic spine. Technical note. Surg Neurol 2002; 58 (5) 346-348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Paolini S, Ciappetta P, Missori P, Raco A, Delfini R. Spinous process marking: a reliable method for preoperative surface localization of intradural lesions of the high thoracic spine. Br J Neurosurg 2005; 19 (1) 74-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Cornips E, Beuls E, Geskes G, Janssens M, van Aalst J, Hofman P. Preoperative localization of herniated thoracic discs using myelo-CT guided transpleural puncture: technical note. Childs Nerv Syst 2007; 23 (1) 21-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hsu W, Sciubba DM, Sasson AD , et al. Intraoperative localization of thoracic spine level with preoperative percutaneous placement of intravertebral polymethylmethacrylate. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008; 21 (1) 72-75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Chin KR, Seale JM, Cumming VM. Avoidance of wrong-level thoracic spine surgery using sterile spinal needles. J Spinal Disord Tech 2013; ; October 31 (Epub ahead of print)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sandow BA, Donnal JF. Myelography complications and current practice patterns. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185 (3) 768-771
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Dietze Jr DD, Fessler RG. Thoracic disc herniations. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1993; 4 (1) 75-90
    PubMedGoogle Scholar