J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30(07): 463-468
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1370361
Original Article WSRM Special Topic Issue—Flaps
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Inverse Relationship of the Anterolateral and Anteromedial Thigh Flap Perforator Anatomy

Peirong Yu
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

01 December 2013

12 December 2013

Publication Date:
04 July 2014 (online)

Abstract

Background When anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforators are inadequate, exploration of the contralateral thigh or a new flap may be required. If the anteromedial thigh (AMT) perforators were useable in these instances, harvest could proceed from a single donor site. The purposes of this study were to define the AMT perforator anatomy and examine the relationships between the AMT and ALT perforators.

Methods A total of 100 consecutive thighs were explored. The ALT and AMT perforator size and number were documented. The relationship between ALT and AMT size and number was examined using Fisher exact test, logistic regression, and linear regression.

Results The main blood supply to the AMT flap was the rectus femoris branch (RFB) off the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoris artery. AMT perforators were only present in 51% of the thighs and most likely a single perforator near the midpoint and 3.2 cm medial to the line connecting the anterior superior iliac spine and the patella (perforator B location). Patients with one or fewer ALT perforators had fourfold increased chance of an AMT perforator. Patients with small or no ALT perforators usually had a large AMT perforator. After assigning numeric values to perforators based on size, lower ALT perforator scores were significantly related to higher AMT scores.

Conclusion The RFB is the main vascular pedicle of the AMT flap. There is an inverse relationship between size and number of ALT and AMT perforators: when ALT perforators are inadequate, AMT perforators are typically useable.

 
  • References

  • 1 Lin SJ, Rabie A, Yu P. Designing the anterolateral thigh flap without preoperative Doppler or imaging. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (1) 67-72
  • 2 Song YG, Chen GZ, Song YL. The free thigh flap: a new free flap concept based on the septocutaneous artery. Br J Plast Surg 1984; 37 (2) 149-159
  • 3 Koshima I, Soeda S, Yamasaki M, Kyou J. The free or pedicled anteromedial thigh flap. Ann Plast Surg 1988; 21 (5) 480-485
  • 4 Koshima I, Hosoda M, Moriguchi T, Hamanaka T, Kawata S, Hata T. A combined anterolateral thigh flap, anteromedial thigh flap, and vascularized iliac bone graft for a full-thickness defect of the mental region. Ann Plast Surg 1993; 31 (2) 175-180
  • 5 Koshima I, Hosoda M, Inagawa K, Moriguchi T, Orita Y. Free medial thigh perforator-based flaps: new definition of the pedicle vessels and versatile application. Ann Plast Surg 1996; 37 (5) 507-515
  • 6 Shimizu T, Fisher DR, Carmichael SW, Bite U. An anatomic comparison of septocutaneous free flaps from the thigh region. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 38 (6) 604-610
  • 7 Ao M, Nagase Y, Mae O, Namba Y. Reconstruction of posttraumatic defects of the foot by flow-through anterolateral or anteromedial thigh flaps with preservation of posterior tibial vessels. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 38 (6) 598-603
  • 8 Ao M, Uno K, Maeta M, Nakagawa F, Saito R, Nagase Y. De-epithelialised anterior (anterolateral and anteromedial) thigh flaps for dead space filling and contour correction in head and neck reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 1999; 52 (4) 261-267
  • 9 Schoeller T, Huemer GM, Shafighi M, Gurunluoglu R, Wechselberger G, Piza-Katzer H. Free anteromedial thigh flap: clinical application and review of literature. Microsurgery 2004; 24 (1) 43-48
  • 10 Hupkens P, Van Loon B, Lauret GJ , et al. Anteromedial thigh flaps: an anatomical study to localize and classify anteromedial thigh perforators. Microsurgery 2010; 30 (1) 43-49
  • 11 Katre C, Shaw R, Batstone M, Brown J. Rescue of anterolateral thigh flap with absent perforators using anteromedial thigh flap. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 46 (4) 334-335
  • 12 Hsieh CH, Yang JC, Chen CC, Kuo YR, Jeng SF. Alternative reconstructive choices for anterolateral thigh flap dissection in cases in which no sizable skin perforator is available. Head Neck 2009; 31 (5) 571-575
  • 13 Shaw RJ, Batstone MD, Blackburn TK, Brown JS. Preoperative Doppler assessment of perforator anatomy in the anterolateral thigh flap. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 48 (6) 419-422
  • 14 Yu P, Selber JC. Perforator patterns of the anteromedial thigh flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (3) 151e-157e
  • 15 Yu P, Selber JC, Liu J. Reciprocal dominance of the anterolateral and anteromedial thigh flap perforator anatomy. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 70 (6) 714-716
  • 16 Yu P. Characteristics of the anterolateral thigh flap in a Western population and its application in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck 2004; 26 (9) 759-769
  • 17 Yu P, Youssef A. Efficacy of the handheld Doppler in preoperative identification of the cutaneous perforators in the anterolateral thigh flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (4) 928-933 , discussion 934–935