Evid Based Spine Care J 2014; 05(01): 006-011
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1368668
Original Research
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Concomitance of Cervical Spondylosis and Adult Thoracolumbar Spinal Deformity

Michael H. Weber
1   Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
,
C. H. Hong
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
William W. Schairer
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Steven Takemoto
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Serena S. Hu
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

16 March 2013

11 December 2013

Publication Date:
28 March 2014 (online)

Abstract

Study Design Retrospective cross-sectional study.

Clinical Question What is the prevalence of cervical spondylosis (CS) and thoracolumbar (TL) spinal deformity in an administrative database during a 4-year study period? Is the prevalence of CS or TL deformity higher in patients who have the other spine diagnosis compared with the overall study population? Are patients with both diagnoses more likely to have undergone spine surgery?

Patients and Methods An administrative claims database containing 53 million patients with either Medicare (2005–2008) or private payer (2007–2010) insurance was used to identify patients with diagnoses of CS and/or TL deformity. Disease prevalence between groups was compared using a χ 2 test and reported using prevalence ratios (PR).

Results The prevalence of CS was higher in patients with TL deformity than without TL deformity, for both Medicare (PR = 2.81) and private payer (PR = 1.79). Similarly, the prevalence of TL deformity was higher in patients with CS than without CS for both Medicare (PR = 3.19) and private payer (PR = 2.05). Patients with both diagnoses were more likely to have undergone both cervical (Medicare, PR = 1.44; private payer, PR = 2.03) and TL (Medicare, PR = 1.68; private payer, PR = 1.74) spine fusion. All comparisons were significant with p < 0.0001.

Conclusions Patients with either CS or TL deformity had a higher prevalence of the other spinal diagnosis compared with the overall disease prevalence in the study population. Patients with both diagnoses had a higher prevalence of having spine surgery compared with patients with only one diagnosis. More studies to identify a causal mechanism for this relationship are warranted.

Supplementary Material

 
  • References

  • 1 Moskowitz A, Moe JH, Winter RB, Binner H. Long-term follow-up of scoliosis fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980; 62 (3) 364-376
  • 2 Edgar MA, Mehta MH. Long-term follow-up of fused and unfused idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988; 70 (5) 712-716
  • 3 Hilibrand AS, Tannenbaum DA, Graziano GP, Loder RT, Hensinger RN. The sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 1995; 15 (5) 627-632
    • References

    • 1 Ames CP, Blondel B, Scheer JK , et al. Cervical radiographical alignment: comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38 (22) (Suppl. 01) S149-S160
    • 2 Ha Y, Schwab F, Lafage V , et al. Reciprocal changes in cervical spine alignment after corrective thoracolumbar deformity surgery. Eur Spine J 2013; ; October 18 (Epub ahead of print)
    • 3 Smith JS, Lafage V, Ryan DJ , et al. Association of myelopathy scores with cervical sagittal balance and normalized spinal cord volume: analysis of 56 preoperative cases from the AOSpine North America Myelopathy study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38 (22) (Suppl. 01) S161-S170
    • 4 PearlDiver. . Available at: http://www.pearldiverinc.com/about-us.php . Accessed December 9, 2013
    • 5 Chopoorian JA, Witherell R, Khalil OEM, Ahmed M. Mind your own business by mining your data. SAM Advanced Management Journal 2001; 66 (2) 45-51
    • 6 Hand DJ. Data mining: statistics and more?. Am Stat 1998; 52 (2) 112-118
    • 7 Koh HC, Tan G. Data mining applications in healthcare. J Healthc Inf Manag 2005; 19 (2) 64-72
    • 8 Cios KJ, Moore GW. Uniqueness of medical data mining. Artif Intell Med 2002; 26 (1–2) 1-24