Endoscopy 2014; 46(05): 388-402
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1364970
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis

Tim D. G. Belderbos
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
,
Max Leenders
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
,
Leon M. G. Moons
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
,
Peter D. Siersema
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
26. März 2014 (online)

Background and study aims: Local recurrence has been observed after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions. The indications for follow-up colonoscopy and the optimal time interval are currently unclear. The aims of this systematic review were to assess the frequency of local recurrence after EMR, to identify risk factors for recurrence, and to provide follow-up recommendations.

Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. EMR was defined as endoscopic snare resection after submucosal fluid injection for removal of nonpedunculated adenomas and early carcinomas. Local recurrence was subdivided into early recurrence (detected at the first follow-up colonoscopy) and late recurrence (detected after ≥ 1 previous normal colonoscopy). A random effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled estimate of risk of recurrence.

Results: A total of 33 studies were included. The mean recurrence risk after EMR was 15 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 12 % – 19 %). Recurrence risk was higher after piecemeal resection (20 %; 95 %CI 16 % – 25 %) than after en bloc resection (3 %; 95 %CI 2 % – 5 %; P < 0.0001). In 15 studies that differentiated between early and late recurrences, 152/173 recurrences (88 %) occurred early. In four studies with follow-up at 3, 6, and ≥ 12 months, 19/25 (76 %) recurrences were detected at 3 months, increasing to 24 (96 %) at 6 months. In multivariable analysis, only piecemeal resection was associated with recurrence (3 of 3 studies).

Conclusion: Local recurrence after EMR of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions occurs in 3 % of en bloc resections and 20 % of piecemeal resections. Piecemeal resection was the only independent risk factor for recurrence. As more than 90 % of recurrences are detected at 6 months after EMR, we propose that 6 months is the optimal initial follow-up interval.

Tables e1 and e2 and Appendix e1

 
  • References

  • 1 Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1977-1981
  • 2 Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 687-696
  • 3 Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R et al. Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Gut 2001; 48: 812-815
  • 4 Jorgensen OD, Kronborg O, Fenger C et al. Influence of long-term colonoscopic surveillance on incidence of colorectal cancer and death from the disease in patients with precursors (adenomas). Acta Oncol 2007; 46: 355-360
  • 5 Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 844-857
  • 6 Cottet V, Jooste V, Fournel I et al. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after adenoma removal: a population-based cohort study. Gut 2012; 61: 1180-1186
  • 7 Leung K, Pinsky P, Laiyemo AO et al. Ongoing colorectal cancer risk despite surveillance colonoscopy: the Polyp Prevention Trial Continued Follow-up Study. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 111-117
  • 8 Pabby A, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL et al. Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 385-391
  • 9 Robertson DJ, Greenberg ER, Beach M et al. Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 34-41
  • 10 Huang Y, Gong W, Su B et al. Risk and cause of interval colorectal cancer after colonoscopic polypectomy. Digestion 2012; 86: 148-154
  • 11 Matsuda K, Masaki T, Abo Y et al. Rapid growth of residual colonic tumor after incomplete mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol 1999; 34: 260-263
  • 12 Kunihiro M, Tanaka S, Haruma K et al. Electrocautery snare resection stimulates cellular proliferation of residual colorectal tumor: an increasing gene expression related to tumor growth. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 1107-1115
  • 13 Fujita M, Tsuruta O, Ikeda H et al. Local recurrence of colorectal tumors after endoscopic mucosal resection. Int J Oncol 1997; 11: 533-538
  • 14 Farrar WD, Sawhney MS, Nelson DB et al. Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4: 1259-1264
  • 15 Loeve F, van Ballegooijen M, Boer R et al. Colorectal cancer risk in adenoma patients: a nation-wide study. Int J Cancer 2004; 111: 147-151
  • 16 Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 658-662
  • 17 Cairns SR, Scholefield JH, Steele RJ et al. Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002). Gut 2010; 59: 666-689
  • 18 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 1006-1012
  • 19 Higaki S, Hashimoto S, Harada K et al. Long-term follow-up of large flat colorectal tumors resected endoscopically. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 845-849
  • 20 Hayden JA, Cote P, Bombardier C. Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 427-437
  • 21 Ahlawat SK, Gupta N, Benjamin SB et al. Large colorectal polyps: endoscopic management and rate of malignancy: does size matter?. J Clin Gastroenterol 2011; 45: 347-354
  • 22 Lim TR, Mahesh V, Singh S et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps in typical UK hospitals. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 5324-5328
  • 23 Salama M, Ormonde D, Quach T et al. Outcomes of endoscopic resection of large colorectal neoplasms: an Australian experience. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 25: 84-89
  • 24 Buchner AM, Guarner-Argente C, Ginsberg GG. Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 255-263
  • 25 Tamura S, Nakajo K, Yokoyama Y et al. Evaluation of endoscopic mucosal resection for laterally spreading rectal tumors. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 306-312
  • 26 Fasoulas K, Lazaraki G, Chatzimavroudis G et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection of giant laterally spreading tumors with submucosal injection of hydroxyethyl starch: comparative study with normal saline solution. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012; 22: 272-278
  • 27 Kao KT, Giap AQ, Abbas MA. Endoscopic excision of large colorectal polyps as a viable alternative to surgical resection. Arch Surg 2011; 146: 690-696
  • 28 Arezzo A, Pagano N, Romeo F et al. Hydroxy-propyl-methyl-cellulose is a safe and effective lifting agent for endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 1065-1069
  • 29 Mahadeva S, Rembacken BJ. Standard “inject and cut” endoscopic mucosal resection technique is practical and effective in the management of superficial colorectal neoplasms. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 417-422
  • 30 Moss A, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 1909-1918
  • 31 Seitz U, Bohnacker S, Seewald S et al. Long-term results of endoscopic removal of large colorectal adenomas. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 41-S44
  • 32 Hotta K, Fujii T, Saito Y et al. Local recurrence after endoscopic resection of colorectal tumors. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24: 225-230
  • 33 Moss A, Bourke MJ, Metz AJ. A randomized, double-blind trial of succinylated gelatin submucosal injection for endoscopic resection of large sessile polyps of the colon. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 2375-2382
  • 34 Ah Soune P, Menard C, Salah E et al. Large endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors exceeding 4 cm. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 588-595
  • 35 Arebi N, Swain D, Suzuki N et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection of 161 cases of large sessile or flat colorectal polyps. Scand J Gastroenterol 2007; 42: 859-866
  • 36 Barendse RM, van den Broek FJ, van Schooten J et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection vs transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the treatment of large rectal adenomas. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: e191-196
  • 37 Bergmann U, Beger HG. Endoscopic mucosal resection for advanced non-polypoid colorectal adenoma and early stage carcinoma. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 475-479
  • 38 Bories E, Pesenti C, Monges G et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for advanced sessile adenoma and early-stage colorectal carcinoma. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 231-235
  • 39 Brooker JC, Saunders BP, Shah SG et al. Treatment with argon plasma coagulation reduces recurrence after piecemeal resection of large sessile colonic polyps: a randomized trial and recommendations. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 371-375
  • 40 Conio M, Blanchi S, Repici A et al. Cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53: 919-927
  • 41 Conio M, Repici A, Demarquay JF et al. EMR of large sessile colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 234-241
  • 42 Dos Santos CEO, Malaman D, Pereira-Lima JC. Endoscopic mucosal resection in colorectal lesion: a safe and effective procedure even in lesions larger than 2 cm and in carcinomas. Arquivos de Gastroenterologia 2011; 48: 242-247
  • 43 Ferrara F, Luigiano C, Ghersi S et al. Efficacy, safety and outcomes of ‘inject and cut’ endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile and flat colorectal polyps. Digestion 2010; 82: 213-220
  • 44 Huang Y, Liu S, Gong W et al. Clinicopathologic features and endoscopic mucosal resection of laterally spreading tumors: experience from China. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24: 1441-1450
  • 45 Hurlstone DP, Sanders DS, Cross SS et al. A prospective analysis of extended endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal villous adenomas: an alternative technique to transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Colorectal Dis 2005; 7: 339-344
  • 46 Hurlstone DP, Sanders DS, Cross SS et al. Colonoscopic resection of lateral spreading tumours: a prospective analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection. Gut 2004; 53: 1334-1339
  • 47 Iishi H, Tatsuta M, Iseki K et al. Endoscopic piecemeal resection with submucosal saline injection of large sessile colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 697-700
  • 48 Jin HY, Wu K, Ye H et al. Size over 20mm is an independent risk factor of endoscopic mucosa resection (EMR) for colorectal lateral spread tumor (LST): A prospective study and multivariate analysis. Cancer Therapy 2009; 7: 27-30
  • 49 Kaltenbach T, Friedland S, Maheshwari A et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of standardized EMR of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal lesions > or = 1 cm (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 857-865
  • 50 Katsinelos P, Kountouras J, Paroutoglou G et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection of large sessile colorectal polyps with submucosal injection of hypertonic 50 percent dextrose-epinephrine solution. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 1384-1392
  • 51 Katsinelos P, Paroutoglou G, Beltsis A et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection of lateral spreading tumors of the colon using a novel solution. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2006; 16: 73-77
  • 52 Khashab M, Eid E, Rusche M et al. Incidence and predictors of “late” recurrences after endoscopic piecemeal resection of large sessile adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 344-349
  • 53 Kobayashi N, Yoshitake N, Hirahara Y et al. Matched case-control study comparing endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 27: 728-733
  • 54 Lee EJ, Lee JB, Lee SH et al. Endoscopic treatment of large colorectal tumors: comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting, and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 2220-2230
  • 55 Luigiano C, Consolo P, Scaffidi MG et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for large and giant sessile and flat colorectal polyps: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 829-835
  • 56 Mannath J, Subramanian V, Singh R et al. Polyp recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of sessile and flat colonic adenomas. Dig Dis Sci 2011; 56: 2389-2395
  • 57 Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T et al. Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 343-352
  • 58 Sakamoto T, Matsuda T, Otake Y et al. Predictive factors of local recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol 2012; 47: 635-640
  • 59 Seo GJ, Sohn DK, Han KS et al. Recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection for large sessile colorectal polyps. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 2806-2811
  • 60 Stergiou N, Riphaus A, Lange P et al. Endoscopic snare resection of large colonic polyps: how far can we go?. Int J Colorectal Dis 2003; 18: 131-135
  • 61 Tajika M, Niwa Y, Bhatia V et al. Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal tumors. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 23: 1042-1049
  • 62 Tanaka S, Haruma K, Oka S et al. Clinicopathologic features and endoscopic treatment of superficially spreading colorectal neoplasms larger than 20 mm. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 62-66
  • 63 Terasaki M, Tanaka S, Oka S et al. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for laterally spreading tumors larger than 20 mm. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 27: 734-740
  • 64 Woodward TA, Heckman MG, Cleveland P et al. Predictors of complete endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed gastrointestinal neoplasia of the colon. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 650-654
  • 65 Barendse RM, van den Broek FJ, Dekker E et al. Systematic review of endoscopic mucosal resection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large rectal adenomas. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 941-949
  • 66 Pohl H, Srivastava A, Bensen SP et al. Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy – results of the complete adenoma resection (CARE) study. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 74-80
  • 67 Longcroft-Wheaton G, Duku M, Mead R et al. Risk stratification system for evaluation of complex polyps can predict outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56: 960-966
  • 68 Zlatanic J, Waye JD, Kim PS et al. Large sessile colonic adenomas: use of argon plasma coagulator to supplement piecemeal snare polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 731-735
  • 69 Regula J, Wronska E, Polkowski M et al. Argon plasma coagulation after piecemeal polypectomy of sessile colorectal adenomas: long-term follow-up study. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 212-218