Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2014; 27(05): 383-392
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1364099
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Outcome of Chronic Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

David R. McAllister
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
,
Brock Foster
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Southern California, Pasadena, California
,
Daniel E. Martin
3   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
,
Andrew J. Veitch
4   Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
,
Frederick J. Dorey
5   Department of Statistics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
,
Frank Petrigliano
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
,
Sharon L. Hame
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

05 July 2013

19 November 2013

Publication Date:
17 January 2014 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The aim of the article is to identify demographic and intraoperative factors that predict patient-oriented outcomes as measured by knee-specific and general quality of life (QoL) questionnaires for chronic, unilateral primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears following surgical reconstruction. A total of 69 patients were prospectively evaluated using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form (SF-36), modified Lysholm, Tegner activity level, and subjective portion of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaires. The surveys were administered preoperatively and postoperatively with a minimum 2-year follow up. Efficacy of treatment was evaluated by comparing preoperative and postoperative questionnaire scores. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to identify demographic and intraoperative variables that were independent predictors of outcome. At a minimum 2-year follow-up (mean, 3.6 years), 55 of 69 patients (80%) were available for follow-up. There were statistically significant improvements in the Lysholm, Tegner, and subjective portion of the IKDC, as well as several SF-36 domains that measure physical capabilities (p < 0.001) . Increasingly, severe patellofemoral and medial compartment articular cartilage damage was associated with lower physical function (PF) (p = 0.009 and 0.005, respectively) and physical component (p = 0.041 and 0.033, respectively) scores on the SF-36. Medial compartment articular cartilage damage and the presence of a lateral meniscus tear were independent predictors of lower bodily pain (BP) scores on the SF-36 (p = 0.007 and 0.010, respectively). QoL and knee function were improved following ACL reconstruction for chronic ACL tears. Independent predictors of poorer outcome were identified in the PF, bodily pain, and physical component score (PCS) of the SF-36. Increasingly, severe articular cartilage injury to the medial and patellofemoral compartments, as well as the presence of a lateral meniscal tear were predictive of poorer outcomes.

Keywords

ACL - chronic - quality of life - outcomes
 

  • References

  • 1 Jomha NM, Borton DC, Clingeleffer AJ, Pinczewski LA. Long-term osteoarthritic changes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (358) 188-193
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 von Porat A, Roos EM, Roos H. High prevalence of osteoarthritis 14 years after an anterior cruciate ligament tear in male soccer players: a study of radiographic and patient relevant outcomes. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63 (3) 269-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lohmander LS, Englund PM, Dahl LL, Roos EM. The long-term consequence of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (10) 1756-1769
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Shapiro ET, Richmond JC, Rockett SE, McGrath MM, Donaldson WR. The use of a generic, patient-based health assessment (SF-36) for evaluation of patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24 (2) 196-200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Spindler KP, Warren TA, Callison Jr JC, Secic M, Fleisch SB, Wright RW. Clinical outcome at a minimum of five years after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (8) 1673-1679
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wexler G, Bach Jr BR, Bush-Joseph CA, Smink D, Ferrari JD, Bojchuk J. Outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with Workers' Compensation claims. Arthroscopy 2000; 16 (1) 49-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Anderson C, Odensten M, Good L , et al. Surgical or non-surgical treatment of acute rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament: A randomized study with long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71 (7) 965-974
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Clancy Jr WG, Ray JM, Zoltan DJ. Acute tears of the anterior cruciate ligament. Surgical versus conservative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988; 70 (10) 1483-1488
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Wu WH, Hackett T, Richmond JC. Effects of meniscal and articular surface status on knee stability, function, and symptoms after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a long-term prospective study. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30 (6) 845-850
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Shelbourne KD, Gray T. Results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction based on meniscus and articular cartilage status at the time of surgery. Five- to fifteen-year evaluations. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28 (4) 446-452
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Zaccherotti G, De Biase P. Patellar tendon versus doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22 (2) 211-217 , discussion 217–218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Harner CD, Olson E, Irrgang JJ, Silverstein S, Fu FH, Silbey M. Allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 3- to 5-year outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 324 (324) 134-144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 O'Neill DB. Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A prospective randomized analysis of three techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78 (6) 803-813
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Jørgensen U, Bak K, Ekstrand J, Scavenius M. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with the iliotibial band autograft in patients with chronic knee instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2001; 9 (3) 137-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Frobell RB, Roos EM, Roos HP, Ranstam J, Lohmander LS. A randomized trial of treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tears. N Engl J Med 2010; 363 (4) 331-342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Herrington L, Wrapson C, Matthews M, Matthews H. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, hamstring versus bone-patella tendon-bone grafts: a systematic literature review of outcome from surgery. Knee 2005; 12 (1) 41-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Barrett GR, Noojin FK, Hartzog CW, Nash CR. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in females: A comparison of hamstring versus patellar tendon autograft. Arthroscopy 2002; 18 (1) 46-54
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Drogset JO, Grøntvedt T, Tegnander A. Endoscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts fixed with bioabsorbable or metal interference screws: a prospective randomized study of the clinical outcome. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33 (8) 1160-1165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Eriksson K, Anderberg P, Hamberg P , et al. A comparison of quadruple semitendinosus and patellar tendon grafts in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83 (3) 348-354
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Eriksson K, Anderberg P, Hamberg P, Olerud P, Wredmark T. There are differences in early morbidity after ACL reconstruction when comparing patellar tendon and semitendinosus tendon graft. A prospective randomized study of 107 patients. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2001; 11 (3) 170-177
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Goradia VK, Grana WA. A comparison of outcomes at 2 to 6 years after acute and chronic anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using hamstring tendon grafts. Arthroscopy 2001; 17 (4) 383-392
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Patel AA, Donegan D, Albert T. The 36-item short form. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007; 15 (2) 126-134
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Tanner SM, Dainty KN, Marx RG, Kirkley A. Knee-specific quality-of-life instruments: which ones measure symptoms and disabilities most important to patients?. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (9) 1450-1458
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Ware JE. The SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: Nimrod Press; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 Physical & Mental Health Summary Scales: A User's Manuel. Boston, MA: Health Assessment Lab; 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Busija L, Osborne RH, Nilsdotter A, Buchbinder R, Roos EM. Magnitude and meaningfulness of change in SF-36 scores in four types of orthopedic surgery. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2008; 6: 55-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Eitzen I, Holm I, Risberg MA. Preoperative quadriceps strength is a significant predictor of knee function two years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43 (5) 371-376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Hefti F, Müller W, Jakob RP, Stäubli HU. Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1993; 1 (3-4) 226-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; 198 (198) 43-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 1982; 10 (3) 150-154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Outerbridge RE. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1961; 43-B: 752-757
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Ochiai S, Hagino T, Tonotsuka H, Haro H. Health-related quality of life in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010; 130 (3) 397-399
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Maletis GB, Cameron SL, Tengan JJ, Burchette RJ. A prospective randomized study of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of patellar tendon and quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis tendons fixed with bioabsorbable interference screws. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (3) 384-394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Stengel D, Casper D, Bauwens K, Ekkernkamp A, Wich M. Bioresorbable pins and interference screws for fixation of hamstring tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (9) 1692-1698
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Risberg MA, Holm I. The long-term effect of 2 postoperative rehabilitation programs after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled clinical trial with 2 years of follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (10) 1958-1966
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Kowalchuk DA, Harner CD, Fu FH, Irrgang JJ. Prediction of patient-reported outcome after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2009; 25 (5) 457-463
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Barenius B, Nordlander M, Ponzer S, Tidermark J, Eriksson K. Quality of life and clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon graft or quadrupled semitendinosus graft: an 8-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (8) 1533-1541
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar