J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2014; 75(04): 231-235
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1363172
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Image-Guided Robotic Skull Base Surgery

Grace Kim Austin
1   Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
,
Kibwei A. McKinney
1   Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
,
Charles S. Ebert Jr.
1   Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
,
Adam M. Zanation
1   Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

10 December 2012

22 October 2013

Publication Date:
17 April 2014 (online)

Abstract

Objectives To describe the potential uses of computed tomography image guidance in concert with the surgical robot for skull base surgery.

Design An anatomical study was conducted.

Setting Tertiary academic center.

Participants Cadaveric skull.

Main Outcome Measures The primary outcome measure was to measure the accuracy of robotic arm positioning to anatomical landmarks on a skull using image guidance and the surgical robot synchronously. Instruments with different angles of rotations were used. Estimated systematic error was calculated and compared with achieved errors. Clinical applications of metachronous image guidance and robotic system were discussed.

Results The skull model approximated < 1 mm accuracy using standard image guidance instruments and the 0-degree robotic arm positioning. Increased angles of instruments from 20 to 60 degrees on the robotic system revealed more significant increases in error than estimated.

Conclusions Image guidance may be useful for transoral robotic approaches. Precise movements are improved by limiting the angle of deviation. Future studies will help optimize the combined technologies before validating the study in clinical settings.

Notes

Oral presentation at the 23rd Annual North American Skull Base Society Meeting, February 15, 2012, Miami, FL (Abstract 45002).


 
  • References

  • 1 Zanation AM, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Gardner PA, Prevedello DM, Kassam AB. Endoscopic endonasal surgery for petrous apex lesions. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (1) 19-25
  • 2 de Almeida JR, Zanation AM, Snyderman CH , et al. Defining the nasopalatine line: the limit for endonasal surgery of the spine. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (2) 239-244
  • 3 Padhye V, Naidoo Y, Alexander H , et al. Endoscopic endonasal resection of anterior skull base meningiomas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 147 (3) 575-582
  • 4 O'Malley Jr BW, Weinstein GS. Robotic anterior and midline skull base surgery: preclinical investigations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 69 (2, Suppl): S125-S128
  • 5 O'Malley Jr BW, Weinstein GS. Robotic skull base surgery: preclinical investigations to human clinical application. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 133 (12) 1215-1219
  • 6 McCool RR, Warren FM, Wiggins III RH, Hunt JP. Robotic surgery of the infratemporal fossa utilizing novel suprahyoid port. Laryngoscope 2010; 120 (9) 1738-1743
  • 7 O'Malley Jr BW, Quon H, Leonhardt FD, Chalian AA, Weinstein GS. Transoral robotic surgery for parapharyngeal space tumors. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2010; 72 (6) 332-336
  • 8 Kim GG, Zanation AM. Transoral robotic surgery to resect skull base tumors via transpalatal and lateral pharyngeal approaches. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (7) 1575-1578