Zahnmedizin up2date, Table of Contents Zahnmedizin up2date 2015; 9(05): 393-420DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1358177 Endodontologie Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York Aktuelle Entwicklungen der maschinellen Wurzelkanalaufbereitung Matthias J. Roggendorf , Johannes Ebert , Roland Frankenberger Recommend Article Abstract Buy Article All articles of this category Full Text References Literatur 1 Schäfer E. Effects of four instrumentation techniques on curved canals: a comparison study. J Endod 1996; 22: 685-689 2 Gülzow A, Stamm O, Martus P et al. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation. Int Endod J 2005; 38: 743-752 3 Hartmann MS, Barletta FB, Camargo Fontanella VR et al. Canal transportation after root canal instrumentation: a comparative study with computed tomography. J Endod 2007; 33: 962-965 4 Tepel J, Schäfer E, Hoppe W. Root canal instruments for manual use: cutting efficiency and instrumentation of curved canals. Int Endod J 1995; 28: 68-76 5 Roane JB, Sabala CL, Duncanson jr. MG. The „balanced force“ concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod 1985; 11: 203-211 6 Schäfer E. Root canal instruments for manual use: a review. Endod Dent Traumatol 1997; 13: 51-64 7 Hülsmann M, Gambal A, Bahr R. An evaluation of root canal preparation with automated Excalibur endodontic handpiece. Clin Oral Investig 1999; 3: 70-78 8 Pettiette MT, Metzger Z, Phillips C et al. Endodontic complications of root canal therapy performed by dental students with stainless-steel K-files and nickel-titanium hand files. J Endod 1999; 25: 230-234 9 Esposito PT, Cunningham CJ. A comparison of hand preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. J Endod 1995; 21: 173-176 10 Thompson SA. An overview of nickel-titanium alloys used in dentistry. Int Endod J 2000; 33: 297-310 11 Walia H, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properies of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 1988; 14: 346-351 12 Schäfer E. Metallurgie und Eigenschaften von Nickel-Titan-Handinstrumenten. Endodontie 1998; 7: 323-335 13 Morgan LF, Montgomery S. An evaluation of the crown-down pressureless technique. J Endod 1984; 10: 491-498 14 Hülsmann M, Herbst U, Schäfers F. Comparative study of root-canal preparation using Lightspeed and Quantec SC rotary NiTi instruments. Int Endod J 2003; 36: 748-756 15 Versümer J, Hülsmann M, Schäfers F. A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 37-46 16 Schäfer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 196-202 17 Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T et al. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J 2012; 45: 449-461 18 Bürklein S, Börjes L, Schäfer E. Comparison of preparation of curved root canals with Hyflex CM and Revo-S rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Int Endod J 2014; 47: 470-476 19 Gambarini G, Grande NM, Plotino G et al. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods. J Endod 2008; 34: 1003-1005 20 Johnson E, Lloyd A, Kuttler S et al. Comparison between a novel nickel-titanium alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of ProFile 25/.04 rotary instruments. J Endod 2008; 34: 1406-1409 21 Albrecht LJ, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. Evaluation of apical debris removal using various sizes and tapers of ProFile GT files. J Endod 2004; 30: 425-428 22 Berutti E, Paolino DS, Chiandussi G et al. Root canal anatomy preservation of WaveOne reciprocating files with or without glide path. J Endod 2012; 38: 101-104 23 Pasqualini D, Bianchi CC, Paolini DS et al. Computed micro-tomographic evaluation of glide path with nickel-titanium rotary PathFile in maxillary first molars curved canals. J Endod 2012; 38: 389-393 24 Metzger Z, Teperovich E, Cohen R et al. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 3: removal of debris and smear layer – A scanning electron microscope study. J Endod 2010; 36: 697-702 25 Peters OA, Paqué F. Root canal preparation of maxillary molars with the self-adjusting file: a micro-computed tomography study. J Endod 2011; 37: 53-57 26 Pasqualini D, Mollo L, Scotti N et al. Postoperative pain after manual and mechanical glide path: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod 2012; 38: 32-36 27 Capar ID, Kaval ME, Ertas H et al. Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of 5 different rotary pathfinding instruments made of conventional nickel-titanium wire, M-wire, and controlled memory wire. J Endod 2015; 41: 535-538 28 Gambarini G, Al Sudani D, Di Carlo S et al. Incidence and intensity of postoperative pain and periapical inflammation after endodontic treatment with two different instrumentation techniques. Eur J Inflamm 2012; 10: 99-103 29 Kazemi RB, Stenman E, Spångberg LS. The endodontic file is a disposable instrument. J Endod 1995; 21: 451-455 30 Koch A. Einfluss von Prionendekontaminationsprotokollen auf die Schneidleistung und Fraktursicherheit von endodontischen Nickel-Titan-Instrumenten des ProTaper-Systems. [Medizinische Dissertation]. Marburg: 2010
