J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30(02): 097-102
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1357278
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The Abdominal Fascial Closure in a Double-Breasted Jacket Pattern Following a TRAM Free Flap Breast Reconstruction

Young Seok Kim
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
,
Han-Su Yoo
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
,
Jong Won Hong
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
,
Dae hyun Lew
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
,
Tai Suk Roh
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

27 February 2013

06 August 2013

Publication Date:
07 January 2014 (online)

Abstract

The primary closure of abdominal fascia after breast reconstruction with transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap has been reported to be the most effective way to reduce these complications. A total of 108 patients who underwent immediate unilateral breast reconstruction with muscle-sparing TRAM flap were included in the study. We compared complications between 56 patients who underwent conventional primary fascial closure (group 1) and 52 who underwent fascial closure in a new double-breasted jacket pattern (group 2), retrospectively. Abdominal bulging occurred in four patients (7.1%) in group 1 and one patient (1.9%) in group 2 (p = 0.01). An abdominal wound dehiscence occurred in three (5.4%) patient in group 1 and two (3.8%) patient in group 2 (p = 0.12). After conventional or muscle-sparing TRAM free flap reconstruction, closing the abdominal fascia in a double-breasted jacket pattern can help reinforce the lower abdominal fascia and prevent abdominal bulging caused by abdominal fascia tensional imbalance.

 
  • References

  • 1 Vega S, Smartt Jr JM, Jiang S , et al. 500 Consecutive patients with free TRAM flap breast reconstruction: a single surgeon's experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (2) 329-339
  • 2 Hartrampf CR, Scheflan M, Black PW. Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 69 (2) 216-225
  • 3 Mizgala CL, Hartrampf Jr CR, Bennett GK. Assessment of the abdominal wall after pedicled TRAM flap surgery: 5- to 7-year follow-up of 150 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (5) 988-1002 , discussion 1003–1004
  • 4 Chun YS, Sinha I, Turko A , et al. Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (4) 1133-1141
  • 5 Ascherman JA, Seruya M, Bartsich SA. Abdominal wall morbidity following unilateral and bilateral breast reconstruction with pedicled TRAM flaps: an outcomes analysis of 117 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (1) 1-8
  • 6 Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Mistry D. The internal oblique repair of abdominal bulges secondary to TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96 (1) 100-104
  • 7 Kim EK, Eom JS, Ahn SH, Son BH, Lee TJ. Evolution of the pedicled TRAM flap: a prospective study of 500 consecutive cases by a single surgeon in Asian patients. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 63 (4) 378-382
  • 8 Rossetto LA, Abla LE, Vidal R , et al. Factors associated with hernia and bulge formation at the donor site of the pedicled TRAM flap. Eur J Plast Surg 2010; 33 (4) 203-208
  • 9 Man LX, Selber JC, Serletti JM. Abdominal wall following free TRAM or DIEP flap reconstruction: a meta-analysis and critical review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (3) 752-764
  • 10 Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris T, Momen B. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (2) 436-444 , discussion 445–446
  • 11 Bajaj AK, Chevray PM, Chang DW. Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and free DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (3) 737-746 , discussion 747–750
  • 12 Boehmler IV JH, Butler CE, Ensor J, Kronowitz SJ. Outcomes of various techniques of abdominal fascia closure after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (3) 773-781
  • 13 Kroll SS, Marchi M. Comparison of strategies for preventing abdominal-wall weakness after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89 (6) 1045-1051 , discussion 1052–1053
  • 14 Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Robb G, Evans G. Abdominal wall strength, bulging, and hernia after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96 (3) 616-619
  • 15 Nahabedian MY. Secondary operations of the anterior abdominal wall following microvascular breast reconstruction with the TRAM and DIEP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (2) 365-372
  • 16 Hartrampf Jr CR. Abdominal wall competence in transverse abdominal island flap operations. Ann Plast Surg 1984; 12 (2) 139-146
  • 17 Glasberg SB, D'Amico RA. Use of regenerative human acellular tissue (AlloDerm) to reconstruct the abdominal wall following pedicle TRAM flap breast reconstruction surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (1) 8-15
  • 18 Zienowicz RJ, May Jr JW. Hernia prevention and aesthetic contouring of the abdomen following TRAM flap breast reconstruction by the use of polypropylene mesh. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96 (6) 1346-1350
  • 19 Wan DC, Tseng CY, Anderson-Dam J, Dalio AL, Crisera CA, Festekjian JH. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (2) 367-374
  • 20 Israeli R, Hazani R, Feingold RS, DeNoto III G, Scheiner MS. Extended mesh repair with external oblique muscle reinforcement for abdominal wall contour abnormalities following TRAM flap. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 63 (6) 654-658
  • 21 Nahabedian MY, Momen B. Lower abdominal bulge after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 54 (2) 124-129
  • 22 Vyas RM, Dickinson BP, Fastekjian JH, Watson JP, Dalio AL, Crisera CA. Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (5) 1519-1526
  • 23 Nahabedian MY. Does AlloDerm stretch?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (5) 1276-1280
  • 24 Lallement M, Missana MC, Bourgeon Y, Abbes M. Closure of the abdominal wall after removal of a mucocutaneous flap from the transverse rectus abdominis for breast reconstruction. Apropos of 48 cases. Review of the literature [in French]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 1994; 39 (6) 733-741
  • 25 Suominen S, Asko-Seljavaara S, von Smitten K, Ahovuo J, Sainio P, Alaranta H. Sequelae in the abdominal wall after pedicled or free TRAM flap surgery. Ann Plast Surg 1996; 36 (6) 629-636
  • 26 Chun YS, Sinha I, Turko A, Lipsitz S, Pribaz JJ. Outcomes and patient satisfaction following breast reconstruction with bilateral pedicled TRAM flaps in 105 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (1) 1-9