Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30(02): 083-090
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1357270
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Complex Heel Reconstruction with a Sural Fasciomyocutaneous Perforator Flap

Shengdi Lu
1   Department of Repair and Reconstruction, Shanghai 6th People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
,
Yimin Chai
1   Department of Repair and Reconstruction, Shanghai 6th People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
,
Chunyang Wang
1   Department of Repair and Reconstruction, Shanghai 6th People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
,
Gen Wen
1   Department of Repair and Reconstruction, Shanghai 6th People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

27 June 2013

31 July 2013

Publication Date:
25 October 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Reconstruction of weight-bearing surfaces at the foot and ankle is controversial. Free tissue transfer and local fasciocutaneous perforator flaps are preferred for plantar reconstruction, but high rates of flap breakdown and ulceration have caused unsatisfactory functional outcomes. We present a modified “sural fasciomyocutaneous perforator flap” and its functional outcome. Between January 2007 and September 2010, 19 patients were treated for soft-tissue defects in the weight-bearing area with sural fasciomyocutaneous perforator flaps. The gastrocnemius, preserved in the base of the flap, was applied as padding under the calcaneus. In follow-up from 9 to 25 months (mean 13.8 months), each patient's pain score, defect size, ulcer formation, protective sensation recovery, and normal footwear were analyzed. The majority of the flaps survived with satisfactory aesthetic and functional results. One case of partial flap loss and one case of delayed ulceration were noted. With partial weight bearing at 4 weeks, satisfactory gait recovery was obtained at 5 to 8 months (in conjunction with protective sensation recovery). Sural fasciomyocutaneous perforator flap is a reliable modality in heel construction, showing advantages of low ulceration rate, durability, and good protective sensation recovery compared with conventional free tissue transfer and local fasciocutaneous perforator flap.

Keywords

heel reconstruction - perforator flap - fasciocutaneous flap - myocutaneous flap
 

  • References

  • 1 Shaw WW, Hidalgo DA. Anatomic basis of plantar flap design: clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 78 (5) 637-649
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hollenbeck ST, Woo S, Komatsu I, Erdmann D, Zenn MR, Levin LS. Longitudinal outcomes and application of the subunit principle to 165 foot and ankle free tissue transfers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (3) 924-934
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 May Jr JW, Halls MJ, Simon SR. Free microvascular muscle flaps with skin graft reconstruction of extensive defects of the foot: a clinical and gait analysis study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 75 (5) 627-641
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Sönmez A, Bayramiçli M, Sönmez B, Numanoğlu A. Reconstruction of the weight-bearing surface of the foot with nonneurosensory free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111 (7) 2230-2236
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hong JP, Kim EK. Sole reconstruction using anterolateral thigh perforator free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (1) 186-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hallock GG. Distally based flaps for skin coverage of the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Int 1996; 17 (6) 343-348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Schaverien M, Saint-Cyr M. Perforators of the lower leg: analysis of perforator locations and clinical application for pedicled perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (1) 161-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Al-Qattan MM. A modified technique for harvesting the reverse sural artery flap from the upper part of the leg: inclusion of a gastrocnemius muscle “cuff” around the sural pedicle. Ann Plast Surg 2001; 47 (3) 269-274 , discussion 274–278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Le Fourn B, Caye N, Pannier M. Distally based sural fasciomuscular flap: anatomic study and application for filling leg or foot defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107 (1) 67-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mueller JE, Ilchmann T, Lowatscheff T. The musculocutaneous sural artery flap for soft-tissue coverage after calcaneal fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2001; 121 (6) 350-352
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Al-Qattan MM. The reverse sural artery adipofasciomuscular flap for the reconstruction of a heel sinus with underlying calcaneal osteomyelitis. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 58 (6) 688-690
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Weinzweig N, Davies BW. Foot and ankle reconstruction using the radial forearm flap: a review of 25 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (6) 1999-2005
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Song YG, Chen GZ, Song YL. The free thigh flap: a new free flap concept based on the septocutaneous artery. Br J Plast Surg 1984; 37 (2) 149-159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ohjimi H, Taniguchi Y, Kawano K, Kinoshita K, Manabe T. A comparison of thinning and conventional free-flap transfers to the lower extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (2) 558-566
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Masquelet AC, Romana MC, Wolf G. Skin island flaps supplied by the vascular axis of the sensitive superficial nerves: anatomic study and clinical experience in the leg. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89 (6) 1115-1121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hallock GG. Distally based flaps for skin coverage of the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Int 1996; 17 (6) 343-348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Chai Y, Zeng B, Zhang F, Kang Q, Yang Q. Experience with the distally based sural neurofasciocutaneous flap supplied by the terminal perforator of peroneal vessels for ankle and foot reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 59 (5) 526-531
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Nakajima H, Imanishi N, Fukuzumi S , et al. Accompanying arteries of the lesser saphenous vein and sural nerve: anatomic study and its clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103 (1) 104-120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Schaverien M, Saint-Cyr M. Perforators of the lower leg: analysis of perforator locations and clinical application for pedicled perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (1) 161-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Wong MZ, Wong CH, Tan BK, Chew KY, Tay SC. Surgical anatomy of the medial sural artery perforator flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28 (8) 555-560
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 El-Sabbagh AH. Skin perforator flaps: an algorithm for leg reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2011; 27 (9) 511-523
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hallock GG. A paradigm shift in flap selection protocols for zones of the lower extremity using perforator flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (4) 233-240
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Follmar KE, Baccarani A, Baumeister SP, Levin LS, Erdmann D. The distally based sural flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (6) 138e-148e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hallock GG. Anatomic basis of the gastrocnemius perforator-based flap. Ann Plast Surg 2001; 47 (5) 517-522
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Dai J, Chai Y, Wang C, Wen G, Liu S, Zhang W. Comparative study of two types of distally based sural neurocutaneous flap for reconstruction of lower leg, ankle, and heel. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (2) 125-130
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Chen SL, Chen TM, Chou TD, Chang SC, Wang HJ. Distally based sural fasciomusculocutaneous flap for chronic calcaneal osteomyelitis in diabetic patients. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 54 (1) 44-48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Durham JW, Saltzman CL, Steyers CM, Miller BA. Outcome after free flap reconstruction of the heel. Foot Ankle Int 1994; 15 (5) 250-255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Noever G, Brüser P, Köhler L. Reconstruction of heel and sole defects by free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 78 (3) 345-352
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Mendieta MJ, Roblero C, Vega JC. Neurotized distally based sural flap for heel reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013;
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Erdmann D, Levin S. Delayed reverse sural flap for staged reconstruction of the foot and lower leg. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (2) 571-572
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar