Ultraschall Med 2014; 35(3): 253-258
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1355767
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Effect of Aging and Diffuse Chronic Pancreatitis on Pancreas Elasticity Evaluated using Semiquantitative EUS Elastography

Einfluss von Alter und chronischer Pankreatitis auf die Gewebshärte des Pankreas – eine Untersuchung mittels semiquantitativer endosonografischer Elastografie
J. Janssen
,
I. Papavassiliou
Further Information

Publication History

21 June 2013

05 August 2013

Publication Date:
10 December 2013 (online)

Abstract

Purpose: Endosonographic elastography has been introduced as a method of estimating the stiffness of pancreatic tumors. This prospective single-center study was conducted to evaluate changes in the stiffness of the pancreas related to age and diffuse chronic pancreatitis.

Patients and Methods: 46 individuals each up to age 60 (group 1) and over age 60 (group 2) with healthy pancreata and 26 patients with diffuse chronic pancreatitis (group 3) were included. Three elastograms were obtained in each case by endosonography in a defined section through the pancreatic body. Elastograms were further evaluated by histogram analysis. Mean strain values, based on a range from 0 (hardest) to 255 (softest), and their standard deviation were calculated from the histogram. The three groups were compared statistically with regard to pancreatic stiffness. A cut-off level for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis was defined by testing receiver operating characteristics curves.

Results: The strain values (mean, SD) measured in the pancreatic body in groups 1 – 3 were 110.2 (23.9), 80.0 (16.4), and 32.4 (11.9), respectively. Pairwise comparison of the groups revealed highly significant differences (p < 0.001). At a cut-off value of 50, the area under the curve was 0.993 for distinguishing between chronic pancreatitis and healthy pancreata in people aged over 60.

Conclusion: Semiquantitative elastography shows that pancreata become significantly harder during aging, but remain softer than in chronic pancreatitis. A cut-off value of 50 is suggested as a possible diagnostic criterion for diffuse chronic pancreatitis.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Studien zur endosonografischen Elastografie haben sich bislang überwiegend mit der Charakterisierung von Tumoren beschäftigt. In dieser monozentrischen prospektiven Studie haben wir untersucht, ob die Elastografie Änderungen der pankreatischen Gewebshärte infolge des Alterns und diffuser chronischer Pankreatitis nachweisen kann.

Patienten und Methoden: 46 Pankreasgesunde bis einschließlich 60 Jahre (Gruppe 1) oder über 60 Jahre (Gruppe 2) und 26 Patienten mit diffuser chronischer Pankreatitis (Gruppe 3) wurden untersucht. Bei jedem Probanden wurden drei Elastogramme eines endosonografischen Längsschnittes durch das Pankreaskorpus angefertigt. Mittels Histogrammanalyse wurde der mittlere Dehnungswert mit Standardabweichung bestimmt, wobei 0 die niedrigste und 255 die höchste Dehnbarkeit repräsentiert. Die drei Gruppen wurden auf Unterschiede der Dehnungswerte getestet. Mittels ROC (receiver operating characteristics)-Kurven wurde der beste cut-off-Wert für die Diagnose einer chronischen Pankreatitis ermittelt.

Ergebnisse: Die mittleren Dehnbarkeitswerte (Standardabweichung) waren in Gruppe 1 110,2 (23,9), in Gruppe 2 80,0 (16,4) und in Gruppe 3 32,4 (11,9). Alle Gruppen waren im paarweisen Vergleich signifikant verschieden (p < 0,001). Im Vergleich der Ergebnisse bei chronischer Pankreatitis mit den härteren Pancreata der älteren Gesunden zeigte die ROC-Kurve bei einem Wert unter 50 das größte Areal unter der Kurve (0,993).

Zusammenfassung: Semiquantitative Elastografie mittels Histogrammanalyse kann nachweisen, dass gesunde Pankreata mit zunehmendem Alter härter werden, aber weicher bleiben als bei chronischer Pankreatitis. Ein Dehnungswert unter 50 könnte ein diagnostisches Kriterium der chronischen Pankreatitis werden.

 
  • References

  • 1 Ardengh JC, Rosenbaum P, Ganc AJ et al. Role of EUS in the preoperative localization of insulinomas compared with spiral CT. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 552-555
  • 2 Hunt GC, Faigel DO. Assessment of EUS for diagnosing, staging, and determining resectability of pancreatic cancer: a review. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 232-237
  • 3 Kahl S, Glasbrenner B, Leodolter A et al. EUS in the diagnosis of early chronic pancreatitis: a prospective follow-up study. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 507-511
  • 4 Wiersema MJ, Vilmann P, Giovannini M et al. Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 1087-1095
  • 5 Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ. Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1386-1389
  • 6 Eloubeidi MA, Chen VK, Eltoum IA et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer: diagnostic accuracy and acute and 30-day complications. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 2663-2668
  • 7 Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Braden B et al. Improved differentiation of pancreatic tumors using contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 590-597
  • 8 Hocke M, Ignee A, Dietrich CF. Advanced endosonographic diagnostic tools for discrimination of focal chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma — elastography, contrast enhanced high mechanical index (CEHMI) and low mechanical index (CELMI) endosonography in direct comparison. Z Gastroenterol 2012; 50: 199-203
  • 9 Janssen J, Schlörer E, Greiner L. EUS elastography of the pancreas: feasibility and pattern description of the normal pancreas, chronic pancreatitis, and focal pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 971-978
  • 10 Săftoiu A, Vilmann P, Gorunescu F et al. Neural network analysis of dynamic sequences of EUS elastography used for the differential diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 1086-1094
  • 11 Iglesias-Garcia J, Larino-Noia J, Abdulkader I et al. EUS elastography for the characterization of solid pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 1101-1108
  • 12 Săftoiu A, Vilmann P, Hassan H et al. Analysis of endoscopic ultrasound elastography used for characterisation and differentiation of benign and malignant lymph nodes. Ultraschall in Med 2006; 27: 535-542
  • 13 Janssen J, Dietrich CF, Will U et al. Endosonographic elastography in the diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 952-957
  • 14 Săftoiu A, Vilmann P, Ciurea T et al. Dynamic analysis of EUS used for the differentiation of benign and malignant lymph nodes. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 291-300
  • 15 Iglesias-Garcia J, Larino-Noia J, Abdulkader I et al. Quantitative endoscopic ultrasound elastography: an accurate method for the differentiation of solid pancreatic masses. Gastroenterology 2010; 139: 1172-1180
  • 16 Săftoiu A, Vilmann P, Gorunescu F et al. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound elastography used for differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses: a multicenter study. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 596-603
  • 17 Săftoiu A, Vilmann P, Gorunescu F et al. Efficacy of an artificial neural network-based approach to endoscopic ultrasound elastography in diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 84-90
  • 18 Klöppel G, Detlefsen S, Feyerabend B. Fibrosis of the pancreas: the initial tissue damage and the resulting pattern. Virchows Arch 2004; 445: 1-8
  • 19 Jaster R, Emmrich J. Crucial role of fibrogenesis in pancreatic diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 22: 17-29
  • 20 Detlefsen S, Sipos B, Feyerabend B et al. Pancreatic fibrosis associated with age and ductal hyperplasia. Virchows Arch 2005; 447: 800-805
  • 21 Catalano MF, Lahoti S, Geenen JE et al. Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography, endoscopic retrograde pancreatography, and secretin test in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 11-17
  • 22 Bamber J, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CF et al. EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography. Part 1: Basic Principles and Technology. Ultraschall in Med 2013; 34: 169-184
  • 23 Cosgrove D, Piscaglia F, Bamber J et al. EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography. Part 2: Clinical Applications. Ultraschall in Med 2013; 34: 238-253
  • 24 Chong AKH, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ et al. Diagnostic performance of EUS for chronic pancreatitis: a comparison with histopathology. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 808-814
  • 25 Varadarajulu S, Eltoum I, Tamhane A et al. Histopathologic correlates of noncalcific chronic pancreatitis by EUS: a prospective tissue characterization study. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 501-509
  • 26 Schrader H, Wiese M, Ellrichmann M et al. Diagnostic value of quantitative EUS elastography for malignant pancreatic tumors: relationship with pancreatic fibrosis. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33: E196-E201
  • 27 Fritscher-Ravens A. Blue clouds and green clouds: virtual biopsy via EUS elastography?. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 416-417