J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30(01): 073-074
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1354744
Letter to the Editor
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Varicose Peroneal Veins in Fibula Free Flaps

Zhi Yang Ng
1   Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
,
Bien-Keem Tan
1   Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
,
Khong-Yik Chew
1   Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
,
Terence Goh
1   Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

17. Juni 2013

18. Juli 2013

Publikationsdatum:
09. September 2013 (online)

Evaluation of the entire venous system before free fibula harvest is not routinely performed unless there is a suspicion for preexisting venous disorders such as deep venous thrombosis. We present two cases of varicose comitant peroneal veins that were encountered intraoperatively following fibula harvest and the postoperative sequelae.

 
  • References

  • 1 Turker T, Tsai TM, Thirkannad S. Size discrepancy in vessels during microvascular anastomosis: two techniques to overcome this problem. Hand Surg 2012; 17 (3) 413-417
  • 2 Tan BK, Chen HC, He TM, Song IC. Flap prefabrication - the bridge between conventional flaps and tissue-engineered flaps. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2004; 33 (5) 662-666
  • 3 Colt GH. The modern treatment of varicose veins: the history of its evolution. BMJ 1928; 2 (3533) 525-528
  • 4 Yamamoto Y, Nohira K, Kuwahara H, Sekido M, Furukawa H, Sugihara T. Superiority of end-to-side anastomosis with the internal jugular vein: the experience of 80 cases in head and neck microsurgical reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 1999; 52 (2) 88-91
  • 5 Lee W, Chung JW, Yin YH , et al. Three-Dimensional CT venography of varicose veins of the lower extremity: image quality and comparison with doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191 (4) 1186-1191