Int J Sports Med 2014; 35(05): 438-442
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1353175
Orthopedics & Biomechanics
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Mechanical Effects of Defect Closure Following BPTB Graft Harvest for ACL Reconstruction

M. C. Sobieraj
1   Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, United States
,
A. J. Egol
1   Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, United States
,
F. J. Kummer
1   Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, United States
,
E. J. Strauss
1   Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, United States
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf



accepted after revision 10. Juli 2013

Publikationsdatum:
18. September 2013 (online)

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament injury affects roughly 120 000 athletes in the United States every year. One of the most common techniques is the use of a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Graft harvest creates a sizeable defect in the remaining patellar tendon. Closure of this defect is based on surgeon preference. To date there has been no study on the effects of defect closure on the mechanical properties of remaining donor patellar tendon. The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of closure on both the strength and stiffness of the remaining patellar tendon. 7 pairs of fresh frozen cadaver patellar tendons were matched by tendon dimensions. Bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts were harvested from all of the specimens and then half of the paired tendons underwent defect closure. All of the donor tendons were then tested in a servohydraulic load frame to failure at a constant displacement rate at room temperature. This study found no differences in the load at failure, the engineering failure stress, stiffness or in the engineering modulus between the donor tendons that underwent defect closure versus those that did not.

 
  • References

  • 1 Adam F, Pape D, Kohn D, Seil R. Length of the patellar tendon after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Arthroscopy 2002; 18: 859-864
  • 2 Adriani E, Mariani PP, Maresca G, Santori N. Healing of the patellar tendon after harvesting of its mid-third for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and evolution of the unclosed donor site defect. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1995; 3: 138-143
  • 3 Benner RW, Shelbourne KD, Urch SE, Lazarus D. Tear patterns, surgical repair, and clinical outcomes of patellar tendon ruptures after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40: 1834-1841
  • 4 Bertollo N, Bell DJ, Yu Y, Walsh WR. Effects of patellar position and defect healing on in vitro stifle joint kinematics following removal of the central one-third of the patellar tendon in an ovine model. J Orthop Res 2011; 29: 572-581
  • 5 Brandsson S, Faxén E, Eriksson BI, Kälebo P, Swärd L, Lundin O, Karlsson J. Closing patellar tendon defects after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: absence of any benefit. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1998; 6: 82-87
  • 6 Busam ML, Riff A, Bach BR. Single-Bundle ACL reconstruction technique: bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. In: Fu F, Cohen S. (eds.). Current Concepts in ACL Reconstruction. Thorofare: Slack Inc.; 2008: 185-200
  • 7 Butler DL, Kay MD, Stouffer DC. Comparison of material properties in fascicle-bone units from human patellar tendon and knee ligaments. J Biomech 1986; 19: 425-432
  • 8 Cerullo G, Puddu G, Gianní E, Damiani A, Pigozzi F. Anterior cruciate ligament patellar tendon reconstruction: it is probably better to leave the tendon defect open!. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1995; 3: 14-17
  • 9 Couppé C, Hansen P, Kongsgaard M, Kovanen V, Suetta C, Aagaard P, Kjaer M, Magnusson SP. Mechanical properties and collagen cross-linking of the patellar tendon in old and young men. J Appl Physiol 2009; 107: 880-886
  • 10 Dowling NE. Mechanical Behavior of Materials. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1999: 830
  • 11 Dressler MR, Butler DL, Boivin GP. Age-related changes in the biomechanics of healing patellar tendon. J Biomech 2006; 39: 2205-2212
  • 12 France EP, Paulos LE, Rosenberg ID, Harner CD. The biomechanics of anterior cruciate allografts. In: Friedman MJ, Ferkel RJ. (eds.). Prosthetic Ligament Reconstruction of the Knee. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1988: 180-185
  • 13 Goh JC, Lee PY, Bose K. A cadaver study of the function of the oblique part of vastus medialis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995; 77: 225-231
  • 14 Grumet R, Bach B. Arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone tendon bone autograft. In: Bach B, Provencher M. (eds.). ACL Surgery: How to Get it Right the First Time and What to do When Your Surgery Fails. Thorofare: Slack Inc.; 2010: 87-98
  • 15 Hampton DM, Lamb J, Klimkiewicz JJ. Effect of donor age on patellar tendon allograft ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics 2012; 35: 1173-1176
  • 16 Hardin GT, Bach BR, Bush-Joseph CA, Farr J. Endoscopic single-incision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft: surgical technique. 1992 [classical article]. J Knee Surg 2003; 16: 135-144 discussion 145–147
  • 17 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
  • 18 Hashemi J, Chandrashekar N, Slauterbeck J. The mechanical properties of the human patellar tendon are correlated to its mass density and are independent of sex. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2005; 20: 645-652
  • 19 Haut RC, Powlison AC. The effects of test environment and cyclic stretching on the failure properties of human patellar tendons. J Orthop Res 1990; 8: 532-540
  • 20 Hewett TE, Stasi SLD, Myer GD. Current concepts for injury prevention in athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41: 216-224
  • 21 Johnson GA, Tramaglini DM, Levine RE, Ohno K, Choi NY, Woo S. Tensile and viscoelastic properties of human patellar tendon. J Orthop Res 1994; 12: 796-803
  • 22 Kabacoff R. R in Action. Shelter Island: Manning Publications; 2011: 447
  • 23 Milankov ZM, Semnic R, Miljković N, Harhaji V. Reconstruction of patellar tendon rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case report. Knee 2008; 15: 419-422
  • 24 Proctor CS, Jackson DW, Simon TM. Characterization of the repair tissue after removal of the central one-third of the patellar ligament: An experimental study in a goat model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79: 997-1006
  • 25 Shaffer BS, Tibone JE. Patellar tendon length change after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the midthird patellar tendon. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21: 449-454
  • 26 Shelbourne KD, Lawrance SE, Kerr B. Patellar tendon rupture after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Oper Tech Sports Med 2006; 14: 8-14
  • 27 Steadman JR, Dewing CB, Rodkey WG, Briggs KK. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft or allograft using a two-incision technique. In Reider B, Provencher MT, Terry M. (eds.). Operative Techniques: Sports Medicine Surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2010: 429-446
  • 28 Venables WN, Smith DM. An Introduction to R. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012: 103