Open Access
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 18(03): 289-293
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1351682
Review Article
Thieme Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Evaluation of Respiratory Muscle Strength in Mouth Breathers: Clinical Evidences

Autor*innen

  • Renata Andrade da Cunha

    1   Federal University of Pernambuco, Pathophysiology of the Stomatognathic System Research Group—UFPE, Recife/PE, Brazil
  • Daniele Andrade da Cunha

    1   Federal University of Pernambuco, Pathophysiology of the Stomatognathic System Research Group—UFPE, Recife/PE, Brazil
  • Roberta Borba Assis

    1   Federal University of Pernambuco, Pathophysiology of the Stomatognathic System Research Group—UFPE, Recife/PE, Brazil
  • Luciana Ângelo Bezerra

    1   Federal University of Pernambuco, Pathophysiology of the Stomatognathic System Research Group—UFPE, Recife/PE, Brazil
  • Hilton Justino da Silva

    1   Federal University of Pernambuco, Pathophysiology of the Stomatognathic System Research Group—UFPE, Recife/PE, Brazil
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

24. Februar 2013

15. Mai 2013

Publikationsdatum:
05. November 2013 (online)

Abstract

Introduction The child who chronically breathes through the mouth may develop a weakness of the respiratory muscles. Researchers and clinical are seeking for methods of instrumental evaluation to gather complementary data to clinical evaluations. With this in mind, it is important to evaluate breathing muscles in the child with Mouth Breathing.

Objective To develop a review to investigate studies that used evaluation methods of respiratory muscle strength in mouth breathers.

Data Synthesis  The authors were unanimous in relation to manovacuometry method as a way to evaluate respiratory pressures in Mouth Breathing children. Two of them performed with an analog manovacuometer and the other one, digital. The studies were not evaluated with regard to the method efficacy neither the used instruments.

Conclusion There are few studies evaluating respiratory muscle strength in Mouth Breathing people through manovacuometry and the low methodological rigor of the analyzed studies hindered a reliable result to support or refuse the use of this technique.