PDF herunterladen
Endo-Praxis 2013; 29(2): 65-71
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1345778
Originalia
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Einfluss der 3-Tages-Sedierungs-Kurse auf die tägliche Arbeit in Kliniken und Praxen – Ergebnis einer bundesweiten Umfrage

D Schilling
1   Medizinische Klinik II, Diakoniekrankenhaus Mannheim,
,
K Leicht
1   Medizinische Klinik II, Diakoniekrankenhaus Mannheim,
,
U Beilenhoff
2   Deutsche Gesellschaft für Endoskopie-Assistenzpersonal, Ulm,
,
E Kern Wächter
3   ekw.concept Institut für Beratung – Bildung –Training, Walldorf,
,
A Riphaus
4   Innere Medizin – Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, Klinikum Agnes Karl Laatzen
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
27. Mai 2013 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Wir untersuchten mittels einer deutschlandweiten Um-frage in gastroenterologischen Praxen und Kliniken, welchen Einfluss die Teilnahme an den 3-Tages-SedierungsKursen auf die Prozess- und Strukturqualität in der täg-lichen Arbeit genommen hat. Dabei sollte insbesondere ein Vergleich des Zustands vor und nach der Kursabsol-vierung gezogen werden. Der Fragebogen richtete sich speziell an die Zielgruppe des Curriculums, nämlich an das endoskopische Assistenzpersonal.

Schlüsselwörter:

Sedierungsleitlinie - Nationale Umfrage
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Riphaus A, Wehrmann T, Weber B et al. S3-Leitlinie zur „Sedierung in der gastrointestinalen Endoskopie “. Z Gastroenterol 2008; 46: 1298-1330
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Frühmorgen P, Kriel L. Guidelines of the German Society of Digestive and MetabolicDiseases. Guidelines for endoscopic colorectal polypectomy with the sling. Gastroenterol 1998; 36: 117-119
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Riphaus et al. Sedierung in der gastrointestinalen Endoskopie in Deutschland. Gastroenterol 2007; 45: 782-782
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Heuss LT, Froehlich F, Beglinger C. Changing patterns of sedation and monitoring practice during endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey in Switzerland. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 161-166
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Sieg A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U, Eisenbach T. Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 620-627
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Quine MA, Bell GD, McCloy RF et al. Prospective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England: safety, staffing and sedation methods. Gut 1995; 36: 462-467
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Sieg A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U, Heisenbach Th. How safe is premediaction in ambulatory endoscopy in Germany? A prospective study in gastroenterology specialty practices. Dtsch Med Wschr 2000; 125: 1288-93
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Sieg A. Propofol sedation in outpatient Colonoscopy by trained practice nurses supervised by the Gastroenterologist: a prospective evaluation of over 3000 cases. Z Gastroenterol 2007; 45: 697-701
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Jensen JT, Vilmann P, Horsted T et al. Nurse-administered propofol sedation for endoscopy: a risk analysis during an implementation phase. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 716-722
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Hidaka N et al. Low-dose propofol sedation for diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy: results in 10,662 adults. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 1650-1655
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Wehrmann T, Riphaus A. Sedation with propofol for interventional endoscopic procedures: a risk factor analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2008; 43: 368-374
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cote GA, Hovis RM, Ansstas MA et al. Incidence of sedation-related complications with propofol use during advanced endoscopic procederes. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 137-142
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Rex DK, Deenadayalu VP, Eid E et al. Endoscopist-directed administration of propofol: a worldwide safety experience. Gastroenterology 2009; 137: 1229-1237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Beilenhoff U, Engelke M, Kern-Waechter E et al. DEGEA- Curriculum zur Sedierung und Notfallmanagement in der Endoskopie- ein Beitrag zu Sicherheit und Qualität. Endopraxis 2009; 25: 28-32
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Beilenhoff U, Engelke M, Kern-Waechter E et al. DEGEA-Curriculum Sedierung und Notfallmanagement in der Endoskopie für Endoskopiepflege- und -assistenzpersonal. Endopraxis 2009; 25: 32-35
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Dumonceau JM. Nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol: it's all about money. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 453-455
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Riphaus A, Rabofski M, Wehrmann T et al. Endoscopic Sedation and Monitoring Practice in Germany: Results from the First Nationwide Survey. Z Gastroenterol 2009; 47: 1-6
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Riphaus A, Geist F, Wehrmann T. Endoscopic sedation and monitoring practice in Germany: Reevaluation from the first nationalwide Survey 3 years after the implementation of an evidence and consent based national guideline. Z Gastroenterol in press
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Rex DK, Overley C, Walker W. Registered Nurse-Administered Propofol Sedation for Upper Endoscopy and Colonoscopy: Why? When? How?. Reviews in Gastroenterological Disorders 2003; 2: 70-80
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Riphaus A, Bitter H. Short version S3 guideline sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy und medicolegal implications. Z Gastroenterol 2012; 50: 407-410
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Dumonceau JM, Riphaus A, Aparicio JR et al. ESGE-ESGENA-ESA Guideline: Non-anesthesiologist adminstration of propofol for GI endoscopy. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 960-974
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Yusoff IF, Raymond G, Sahai AV. Endoscopist administered propfol for upper-GI EUS is safe and effective: a prospective study in 500 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 356-360
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Heuss LT, Froehlich F, Beglinger C. Nonanaesthsiologist-administered propofol sedation: from the exeption to standard practice. Sedation and monitoring trends over 20 years. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 504-511
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Cohen LB, Wecsler JS, Gaetano JN et al. Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results from a nationwide survey. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 967-974
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Fanti L, Agostoni M, Gemma M et al. Sedation and monitoring for gastrointestinal endoscopy: A nationwide web survey in Italy. Dig Liver Dis 2011; 43: 726-730
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Paspatis GA, Manolaraki MM, Tribonias G et al. Endoscopic sedation in Greece: results from a nationwide survey for the Hellenic Foundation of gastroenterology and nutrition. Dig Liver Dis 2009; 41: 807-811
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Baudet JS, Borque P, Borja E et al. Use of sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy : a nationwide survey in Spain. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 21: 882-888
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Conigliaro R, Rossi A. Implementation of sedation guideleines in clinical practice in Italy: results of a prospective longitudinal multicenter study. Endoscopy 2000; 38: 1137-1143
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Slagelse C, Vilmann P, Hornslet P et al. Nurse-administered propofol sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: first Nordic results from implementation of a structured training program. Scand J Gastroenterol 2011; 46: 1503-9
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Perel A. Non-anaesthesiologists should be not allowed to administer propofol for procedural sedation: a Consensus Statement of 21 European National Societies of Anaethesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28: 580-584
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Werner C, Smith A, Van Aken H. Guidelines on non-anaesthesiologist administration of propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a double-edged sword. European J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28: 553-555
    Google Scholar