Endoscopy 2013; 45(08): 627-634
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1344027
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Japanese multicenter experience of endoscopic necrosectomy for infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis: The JENIPaN study

I. Yasuda
1   First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu
,
M. Nakashima
1   First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu
,
T. Iwai
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University East Hospital, Sagamihara
,
H. Isayama
3   Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo
,
T. Itoi
4   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo
,
H. Hisai
5   Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Red Cross Date General Hospital, Date
,
H. Inoue
6   Department of Gastroenterology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu
,
H. Kato
7   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama
,
A. Kanno
8   Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai
,
K. Kubota
9   Division of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama
,
A. Irisawa
10   Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University Aizu Medical Center, Aizu
,
H. Igarashi
11   Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka
,
Y. Okabe
12   Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume
,
M. Kitano
13   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama
,
H. Kawakami
14   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo
,
T. Hayashi
15   Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo
,
T. Mukai
16   Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu
,
N. Sata
17   Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
,
M. Kida
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University East Hospital, Sagamihara
,
T. Shimosegawa
8   Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 18 November 2012

accepted after revision 26 March 2013

Publication Date:
27 June 2013 (online)

Background and study aims: Only a few large cohort studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of endoscopic necrosectomy for infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN). Therefore, a multicenter, large cohort study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic necrosectomy and to examine the procedural details and follow-up after successful endoscopic necrosectomy.

Patients and methods: A retrospective review was conducted in 16 leading Japanese institutions for patients who underwent endoscopic necrosectomy for infected WOPN between August 2005 and July 2011. The follow-up data were also reviewed to determine the long-term outcomes of the procedures.

Results: Of 57 patients, 43 (75 %) experienced successful resolution after a median of 5 sessions of endoscopic necrosectomy and 21 days of treatment. Complications occurred in 19 patients (33 %) during the treatment period. Six patients died (11 %): two due to multiple organ failure and one patient each from air embolism, splenic aneurysm, hemorrhage from a Mallory – Weiss tear, and an unknown cause. Of 43 patients with successful endoscopic necrosectomy, recurrent cavity formation was observed in three patients during a median follow-up period of 27 months.

Conclusions: Endoscopic necrosectomy can be an effective technique for infected WOPN and requires a relatively short treatment period. However, serious complications can arise, including death. Therefore, patients should be carefully selected, and knowledgeable, skilled, and experienced operators should perform the procedure. Further research into safer technologies is required in order to reduce the associated morbidity and mortality.

 
  • References

  • 1 Sheu Y, Furlan A, Almusa O et al. The revised Atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis: a CT imaging guide for radiologists. Emerg Radiol 2012; 19: 237-243
  • 2 Werner J, Feuerbach S, Uhl W et al. Management of acute pancreatitis: from surgery to interventional intensive care. Gut 2005; 54: 426-436
  • 3 Seewald S, Groth S, Omar S et al. Aggressive endoscopic therapy for pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic abscess: a new safe and effective treatment algorithm (videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 92-100
  • 4 Horvath K, Freeny P, Escallon J et al. Safety and efficacy of video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement for infected pancreatic collections: a multicenter, prospective, single-arm phase 2 study. Arch Surg 2010; 145: 817-825
  • 5 Baron TH, Thaggard WG, Morgan DE et al. Endoscopic therapy for organized pancreatic necrosis. Gastroenterology 1996; 111: 755-764
  • 6 Seifert H, Wehrmann T, Schmitt T et al. Retroperitoneal endoscopic debridement for infected peripancreatic necrosis. Lancet 2000; 356: 653-655
  • 7 Voermans RP, Veldkamp MC, Rauws EA et al. Endoscopic transmural debridement of symptomatic organized pancreatic necrosis (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 909-916
  • 8 Charnley RM, Lochan R, Gray H et al. Endoscopic necrosectomy as primary therapy in the management of infected pancreatic necrosis. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 925-928
  • 9 Escourrou J, Shehab H, Buscail L et al. Peroral transgastric/transduodenal necrosectomy: success in the treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 1074-1080
  • 10 Papachristou GI, Takahashi N, Chahal P et al. Peroral endoscopic drainage/debridement of walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Ann Surg 2007; 245: 943-951
  • 11 Kang SG, Park doH, Kwon TH et al. Transduodenal endoscopic necrosectomy via pancreaticoduodenal fistula for infected peripancreatic necrosis with left pararenal space extension (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 380-383
  • 12 Schrover IM, Weusten BL, Besselink MG et al. EUS-guided endoscopic transgastric necrosectomy in patients with infected necrosis in acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2008; 8: 271-276
  • 13 Seifert H, Biermer M, Schmitt W et al. Transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy after acute pancreatitis: a multicentre study with long-term follow-up (the GEPARD Study). Gut 2009; 58: 1260-1266
  • 14 Gardner TB, Coelho-Prabhu N, Gordon SR et al. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis: results from a multicenter U.S. series. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 718-726
  • 15 American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA physical status classification system. Available from: http://www.asahq.org/Home/For-Members/Clinical-Information/ASA-Physical-Status-Classification-System
  • 16 van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ et al. A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1491-1502
  • 17 van Santvoort HC, Bakker OJ, Bollen TL et al. A conservative and minimally invasive approach to necrotizing pancreatitis improves outcome. Gastroenterology 2011; 141: 1254-1263
  • 18 Gardner TB, Chahal P, Papachristou GI et al. A comparison of direct endoscopic necrosectomy with transmural endoscopic drainage for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1085-1094
  • 19 Bakker OJ, van Santvoort HC, van Brunschot S et al. Endoscopic transgastric vs surgical necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: a randomized trial. JAMA 2012; 307: 1053-1061
  • 20 Mathew A, Biswas A, Meitz KP. Endoscopic necrosectomy as primary treatment for infected peripancreatic fluid collections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 776-782
  • 21 Seewald S, Ang TL, Richter H et al. Long-term results after endoscopic drainage and necrosectomy of symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections. Dig Endosc 2012; 24: 36-41
  • 22 Haghshenasskashani A, Laurence JM, Kwan V et al. Endoscopic necrosectomy of pancreatic necrosis: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 3724-3730