Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2013; 26(01): 019-026
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1333903
Special Focus Section
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Periprosthetic Total Knee Arthroplasty Fractures: Revision Arthroplasty Technique

James A. Keeney
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

03 November 2012

16 December 2012

Publication Date:
07 February 2013 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

With increased use of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) technique, the burden of revision surgery for all causes including periprosthetic fractures is anticipated to increase substantially in the coming decades. Although periprosthetic TKA fractures are most frequently managed with operative repair, there are circumstances where fracture characteristics or patient factors may make a revision total knee arthroplasty more preferable. This article outlines the principles of surgical treatment when a revision arthroplasty technique is selected.

Keywords

periprosthetic - fracture - revision - arthroplasty - knee
 

  • References

  • 1 Su ET, DeWal H, Di Cesare PE. Periprosthetic femoral fractures above total knee replacements. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2004; 12 (1) 12-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Burnett RS, Bourne RB. Periprosthetic fractures of the tibia and patella in total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 2004; 53: 217-235
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (4) 780-785
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Platzer P, Schuster R, Aldrian S , et al. Management and outcome of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty. J Trauma 2010; 68 (6) 1464-1470
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Dittmer DK, Teasell R. Complications of immobilization and bed rest. Part 1: musculoskeletal and cardiovascular complications. Can Fam Physician 1993; 39: 1428-1432 , 1435–1437
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Pour AE, Parvizi J, Slenker N, Purtill JJ, Sharkey PF. Rotating hinged total knee replacement: use with caution. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (8) 1735-1741
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gudnason A, Milbrink J, Hailer NP. Implant survival and outcome after rotating-hinge total knee revision arthroplasty: a minimum 6-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011; 131 (11) 1601-1607
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Springer BD, Hanssen AD, Sim FH, Lewallen DG. The kinematic rotating hinge prosthesis for complex knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 392 (392) 283-291
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Srinivasan K, Macdonald DA, Tzioupis CC, Giannoudis PV. Role of long stem revision knee prosthesis in periprosthetic and complex distal femoral fractures: a review of eight patients. Injury 2005; 36 (9) 1094-1102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mortazavi SM, Kurd MF, Bender B, Post Z, Parvizi J, Purtill JJ. Distal femoral arthroplasty for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25 (5) 775-780
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kassab M, Zalzal P, Azores GM, Pressman A, Liberman B, Gross AE. Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures after total knee arthroplasty using a distal femoral allograft. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19 (3) 361-368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar