Download PDF
manuelletherapie 2012; 16(05): 220-225
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1331824
Schwerpunkt Lumbale Instabilität
Praxis
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Sechs Richtige: Mit der Testbatterie die lumbale Bewegungskontrolle untersuchen

Hannu Luomajoki
  ZHAW Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften, Technikumstr. 9, 8401 Winterthur, Schweiz
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 December 2012 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

WENIGER IST MEHR: Rückenschmerzen sind ein weit verbreitetes Problem, viele Physiotherapeuten behandeln sie sehr häufig. Inzwischen wissen wir, strukturelle Befunde sagen kaum etwas über die Beschwerden aus. Heute orientieren wir uns zunehmend an funktionellen Befunden, wie die klinische Instabilität. Wie können wir sie unkompliziert, mit wenigen Tests messen und behandeln?

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Cheung KM, Karppinen J, Chan D et al. Prevalence and pattern of lumbar magnetic resonance imaging changes in a population study of one thousand forty-three individuals. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 934-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Comerford MJ, Mottram SL. Functional stability re-training: principles and strategies for managing mechanical dysfunction. Manual Therapy 2001; 6: 3-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Cook C, Brismee JM, Sizer PS. Subjective and objective descriptors of clinical lumbar spine instability: a Delphi study. Manual therapy 2006; 11: 11-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Costa LO, Costa Lda C, Cancado RL et al. Short report: intra-tester reliability of two clinical tests of transversus abdominis muscle recruitment. Physiotherapy Research International : The Journal for Researchers and Clinicians in Physical Therapy; Physiotherapy Research International. The Journal for Researchers and Clinicians in Physical Therapy 2006; 11: 48-50
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Flor H, Braun C, Elbert T et al. Extensive reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in chronic back pain patients. Neurosci Lett 1997; 224: 5-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hodges PW, Richardson CA. Inefficient muscular stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain. A motor control evaluation of transversus abdominis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996; 21: 2640-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 69-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kjaer P, Leboeuf-Yde C, Korsholm L et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and low back pain in adults: a diagnostic imaging study of 40-year-old men and women. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 1173-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Luomajoki H, Kool J, de Bruin ED et al. Movement control tests of the low back; evaluation of the difference between patients with low back pain and healthy controls. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008; 9: 170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Luomajoki H, Kool J, de Bruin ED et al. Improvement in low back movement control, decreased pain and disability, resulting from specific exercise intervention. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol 2010; 2: 11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Luomajoki H, Kool J, de Bruin ED et al. Reliability of movement control tests in the lumbar spine. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007; 8: 90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Luomajoki H, Moseley GL. Tactile acuity and lumbopelvic motor control in patients with back pain and healthy controls. Br J Sports Med 2011; 45: 437-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Mannion AF, Pulkovski N, Gubler D et al. Muscle thickness changes during abdominal hollowing: an assessment of between-day measurement error in controls and patients with chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 2008; 17: 494-501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 O‘Sullivan P. Diagnosis and classification of chronic low back pain disorders: Maladaptive movement and motor control impairments as underlying mechanism. Manual Therapy 2005; 10: 242-255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Panjabi MM. The stabilizing system of the spine. Part I. Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement. Journal of spinal disorders 1992; 5: 383-9 discussion 397
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Pulkovski N, Mannion AF, Caporaso F et al. Ultrasound assessment of transversus abdominis muscle contraction ratio during abdominal hollowing: a useful tool to distinguish between patients with chronic low back pain and healthy controls?. Eur Spine J 2011; 750-759
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Rackwitz B, de Bie R, Limm H et al. Segmental stabilizing exercises and low back pain. What is the evidence? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 553-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Sahrmann SA. Diagnosis and treatment of movement impairment syndromes. St.Louis: Mosby; 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 19 van Dillen LR, Sahrmann SA, Norton BJ et al. Reliability of physical examination items used for classification of patients with low back pain. Physical Therapy 1998; 78: 979-988
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 van Trijffel E, Anderegg Q, Bossuyt PMM et al. Inter-examiner reliability of passive assessment of intervertebral motion in the cervical and lumbar spine: A systematic review. Manual Therapy 2005; 10: 256-269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar