Int J Sports Med 2013; 34(10): 881-887
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1331757
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Vertical Ground Reaction Force during Water Exercises Performed at Different Intensities

C. L. Alberton
1   School of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
,
M. P. Tartaruga
1   School of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
2   School of Physical Education, Midwest State University of Parana, Guarapuava, Brazil
,
S. S. Pinto
1   School of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
,
E. L. Cadore
1   School of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
,
A. H. Antunes
1   School of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
,
P. Finatto
1   School of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
,
L.F. M. Kruel
1   School of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf



accepted after revision 29. November 2012

Publikationsdatum:
02. April 2013 (online)

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the peak vertical ground reaction force (V-GRFpeak) and impulse of women performing water aerobic exercises at different intensities in aquatic and dry land environments. 15 young women performed 1 session in each environment consisting of 3 water aerobic exercises (stationary running, frontal kick and cross country skiing) performed at 3 cadences (first ventilatory threshold, second ventilatory threshold and maximum effort, as determined during exercise in water) in a randomized order. 2-way and 3-way repeated measures ANOVA were used to analyze the impulse and V-GRFpeak, respectively. Significantly lower values of V-GRFpeak and impulse (p<0.001) were observed for the aquatic environment. Significant differences were observed among all cadences for V-GRFpeak and impulse (p<0.001) in both environments except for the V-GRFpeak between the cadences corresponding to the second ventilatory threshold and maximum effort in the aquatic environment. In addition, significantly lower V-GRFpeak values in the aquatic environment were found for cross country skiing compared to the other exercises (p<0.001). Thus, water exercises are safe for people that need to minimize vertical ground reaction force; however, an important issue to be considered during water aerobics training is the exercise and intensity to be prescribed.

 
  • References

  • 1 Alberton CL, Olkoski MM, Becker ME, Pinto SS, Kruel LFM. Cardiorespiratory responses of postmenopausal women to different water exercises. Int J Aquat Res Educ 2007; 1: 363-372
  • 2 Alberton CL, Cadore EL, Pinto SS, Tartaruga MP, Silva EM, Kruel LFM. Cardiorespiratory, neuromuscular and kinematic responses to stationary running performed in water and on dry land. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011; 111: 1157-1166
  • 3 Barela AMF, Stolf SF, Duarte M. Biomechanical characteristics of adults walking in shallow water and on land. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2006; 16: 250-256
  • 4 Barela AMF, Duarte M. Biomechanical characteristics of elderly individuals walking on land and in water. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2008; 18: 446-454
  • 5 Batterham SI, Heywood S, Keatinge JL. Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing land and aquatic exercises for people with hip or knee arthritis on function, mobility and other health outcomes. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2011; 12: 123
  • 6 Bemben DA, Salm PC, Salm AJ. Ventilatory and blood lactate responses to maximal treadmill exercise during the menstrual cycle. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1995; 35: 257-262
  • 7 Borg G. Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. Scand J Rehabil Med 1970; 2: 92-98
  • 8 Chiu MC, Wang MJ. The effect of gait speed and gender on perceived exertion, muscle activity, joint motion of lower extremity, ground reaction force and heart rate during normal walking. Gait Posture 2007; 25: 385-392
  • 9 Colado JC, Garcia-Masso X, González LM, Triplett NT, Mayo C, Merce J. Two-leg squat jumps in water: an effective alternative to dry land jumps. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31: 118-122
  • 10 Davis JA. Anaerobic threshold: review of the concept and directions for future research. Med Sci Sports Med 1985; 17: 6-18
  • 11 Finkelstein I, Alberton CL, Figueiredo PAP, Garcia DR, Tartaruga LAP, Kruel LFM. Behavior of heart rate, blood pressure, and hydrostatic weight of pregnant women at different immersion depths. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2004; 26: 685-690 [in Portuguese]
  • 12 Haupenthal A, Ruschel C, Hubert M, de Brito-Fontana H, Roesler H. Loading forces in shallow water running in two levels of immersion. J Rehabil Med 2010; 42: 664-669
  • 13 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
  • 14 Harrisson RA, Hillman M, Bulstrode S. Loading of the lower limb when walking partially immersed: Implications for clinical practice. Physiotherapy 1992; 78: 164-166
  • 15 Heyward VH, Stolarczyc LM. Applied Body Composition. 2nd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1996
  • 16 Jackson AS, Pollock ML, Ward A. Generalized equations for predicting body density of women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1980; 12: 175-182
  • 17 Keller TS, Weisberger AM, Ray JL, Hasan SS, Shiavi RG, Spengler DM. Relationship between vertical ground reaction force and speed during walking, slow jogging, and running. Clin Biomech 1996; 11: 253-259
  • 18 Kruel LFM. Hydrostatic weight and heart rate in subjects immersed at different water depths. Unpublished master thesis. Santa Maria. Federal University of Santa Maria, Brazil, 1994 [in Portuguese]
  • 19 Kruel LFM. Physiological and biomechanical alterations in individuals practicing water exercises inside and outside of the water. Unpublished doctoral dissertation Santa Maria. Federal University of Santa Maria, Brazil, 2000 [in Portuguese]
  • 20 Masani K, Kouzaki M, Fukunaga T. Variability of ground reaction forces during treadmill walking. J Appl Physiol 2002; 92: 1885-1890
  • 21 Miyoshi T, Shirota T, Yamamoto S, Nakazawa K, Akai M. Effect of the walking speed to the lower limb joint angular displacements, joint moments and ground reaction forces during walking in water. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 724-732
  • 22 Miyoshi T, Nakazawa K, Tanizaki M, Sato T, Akai M. Altered activation pattern in synergistic ankle plantarflexor muscles in a reduced-gravity environment. Gait Posture 2006; 24: 94-99
  • 23 Nakazawa K, Yano H, Miyashita M. Ground reaction forces during walking in water. Med Sci Aquatic Sports 1994; 39: 28-34
  • 24 Nilsson J, Thorstensson A. Ground reaction forces at different speeds of human walking and running. Acta Physiol Scand 1989; 136: 217-227
  • 25 Pinto SS, Cadore EL, Alberton CL, Silva EM, Kanitz AC, Tartaruga MP, Kruel LFM. Cardiorespiratory and neuromuscular responses during water aerobics exercise performed with and without equipment. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 916-923
  • 26 Raffaeli C, Lanza M, Zanolla L, Zamparo P. Exercise intensity of head-out water-based activities (water fitness). Eur J Appl Physiol 2010; 109: 829-838
  • 27 Roesler H, Haupenthal A, Schütz GR, Souza PV. Dynamometric analysis of the maximum force applied in aquatic human gait at 1.3 m of immersion. Gait Posture 2006; 24: 412-417
  • 28 Triplett NT, Colado JC, Benavent J, Alakhdar Y, Madera J, Gonzalez LM, Tella V. Concentric and impact forces of single-leg jumps in an aquatic environment versus on land. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 1790-1796
  • 29 Wasserman K, Whipp BJ, Koyal SN, Beaver WL. Anaerobic threshold and respiratory gas exchange during exercise. J Appl Physiol 1973; 35: 236-243
  • 30 Winget CH, DeRoshia CW, Holley DC. Circadian rhythms and athletic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1985; 17: 498-516