Gender Does Matter: Gender-Specific Outcome Analysis of 67,855 Heart Transplants

Abstract

Background Gender differences between donor and recipient might have an impact on the outcome after heart transplantation (HT). Data of more than 67,000 patients registered at the International Society of Heart Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) were reviewed focusing on the influence of gender differences on short- and long-term outcome after HT.

Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 67,855 cardiac allograft recipients. They received orthotopic HT between January 1, 1980 and June 30, 2009. In contrast to other studies the data for gender differences (donor gender and recipient gender) were calculated with respect to actuarial and conditional survival (without 30-day mortality).

Results One-year survival was highest in male recipients of male donor hearts (mR/mD: 83.74%). The lowest 1-year outcome showed male recipients of female donor organs (mR/fD: 78.95%). Best 5-year survival rates were shown by male recipients with male donor organs (70.75%, p < 0.0001). These differences disappeared in survival conditional to 1 year, indicating that gender predominantly influences short-term outcome.

Conclusions The combination male recipient/female donor carries a higher risk for early mortality, whereas female recipients/male donor reveals favorable short-term results. Gender-matched HT would be ideal, but not suitable in practice because of the shortage of organs.

Keywords

heart transplantation - survival - outcomes - gender differences

• References

• 1 Aaronson KD, Schwartz JS, Goin JE, Mancini DM. Sex differences in patient acceptance of cardiac transplant candidacy. Circulation 1995; 91 (11) 2753-2761
• 2 Regitz-Zagrosek V, Petrov G, Lehmkuhl E , et al. Heart transplantation in women with dilated cardiomyopathy. Transplantation 2010; 89 (2) 236-244
• 3 Weiss ES, Allen JG, Patel ND , et al. The impact of donor-recipient sex matching on survival after orthotopic heart transplantation: analysis of 18 000 transplants in the modern era. Circ Heart Fail 2009; 2 (5) 401-408
• 4 Meibohm B, Beierle I, Derendorf H. How important are gender differences in pharmacokinetics?. Clin Pharmacokinet 2002; 41 (5) 329-342
• 5 Beierle I, Meibohm B, Derendorf H. Gender differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 1999; 37 (11) 529-547
• 6 Taylor DO, Stehlik J, Edwards LB , et al. Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Twenty-sixth Official Adult Heart Transplant Report-2009. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009; 28 (10) 1007-1022
• 7 Csete M. Gender issues in transplantation. Anesth Analg 2008; 107 (1) 232-238
• 8 Aurora P, Boucek MM, Christie J , et al. Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: tenth official pediatric lung and heart/lung transplantation report—2007. J Heart Lung Transplant 2007; 26 (12) 1223-1228
• 9 Salton CJ, Chuang ML, O'Donnell CJ , et al. Gender differences and normal left ventricular anatomy in an adult population free of hypertension. A cardiovascular magnetic resonance study of the Framingham Heart Study Offspring cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39 (6) 1055-1060
• 10 Izquierdo MT, Almenar L, Martínez-Dolz L , et al. Analysis of the impact of donor gender on early mortality. Transplant Proc 2007; 39 (7) 2375-2376
• 11 Al-Khaldi A, Oyer PE, Robbins RC. Outcome analysis of donor gender in heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2006; 25 (4) 461-468
• 12 Kofler S, Bigdeli AK, Kaczmarek I , et al. Long-term outcomes after 1000 heart transplantations in six different eras of innovation in a single center. Transpl Int 2009; 22 (12) 1140-1150
• 13 Hiemann NE, Knosalla C, Wellnhofer E, Lehmkuhl HB, Hetzer R, Meyer R. Beneficial effect of female gender on long-term survival after heart transplantation. Transplantation 2008; 86 (2) 348-356
• 14 Hiemann NE, Wellnhofer E, Knosalla C , et al. Prognostic impact of microvasculopathy on survival after heart transplantation: evidence from 9713 endomyocardial biopsies. Circulation 2007; 116 (11) 1274-1282
• 15 Markert UR, Fitzgerald JS, Seyfarth L , et al. Lessons from reproductive immunology for other fields of immunology and clinical approaches. Chem Immunol Allergy 2005; 89: 169-179
• 16 Poole JA, Claman HN. Immunology of pregnancy. Implications for the mother. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2004; 26 (3) 161-170
• 17 Zhang J, Chen Z, Smith GN, Croy BA. Natural killer cell-triggered vascular transformation: maternal care before birth?. Cell Mol Immunol 2011; 8 (1) 1-11