Variability in Carotid Endarterectomy at a Single Medical Center: An Outcome and Cost Analysis

Abstract

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a common surgical procedure. Its efficacy in the prevention of stroke has been proven by multiple clinical trials including North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial and Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Currently, there is a wide variability in the technique of this operation. This study was performed to determine the variability of CEA at the University of Kentucky Medical Center with a focus on cost and short-term outcome. We reviewed the charts of a consecutive series of 349 patients undergoing CEA at our institution. We analyzed the variability in shunt used across surgeons, intraoperative variables, cost, and outcome. Data on 374 procedures on 349 patients who underwent CEA showed shunt utilization varied significantly by surgeon from 3 to 94%. Patch utilization also varied significantly by surgeon. Two in-hospital deaths occurred in the shunt group (1.3%) and none in the no-shunt group. Shunt placement was associated with 1 hour 24 minutes increase in operative time from 2 hours 3 minutes in the no-shunt group to 3 hours 27 minutes in the shunt group (t test, p < 0.01). Shunt placement was associated with a 1.74-day increase in length of stay, from 2.97 days in the no-shunt group to 4.71 days in the shunt group. There was no significant difference in the cost of procedure in these two groups: no-shunt $11,510 ± $3,977, shunt group $11,479 ± $4,030. This study showed no significant difference in cost or outcome between various techniques.

Keywords

carotid endarterectomy - stroke - stenosis - shunt - patch - cost analysis - outcomes - mortality - morbidity

• References

• 1 Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM , et al; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2012; 125 (1) e2-e220
• 2 Barnett HJ, Gunton RW, Eliasziw M , et al. Causes and severity of ischemic stroke in patients with internal carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 2000; 283 (11) 1429-1436
• 3 Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M , et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1998; 339 (20) 1415-1425
• 4 Ferguson GG, Eliasziw M, Barr HW , et al. The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: surgical results in 1415 patients. Stroke 1999; 30 (9) 1751-1758
• 5 Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA 1995; 273 (18) 1421-1428
• 6 Rerkasem K, Rothwell PM. Patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 4 (4) CD000160
• 7 Byrne J, Feustel P, Darling III RC. Primary closure, routine patching, and eversion endarterectomy: what is the current state of the literature supporting use of these techniques?. Semin Vasc Surg 2007; 20 (4) 226-235
• 8 Aburahma AF, Mousa AY, Stone PA. Shunting during carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54 (5) 1502-1510
• 9 Wennberg JE, Fisher ES, Stukel TA, Sharp SM. Use of Medicare claims data to monitor provider-specific performance among patients with severe chronic illness. Health Aff 2004; Suppl Variation:VAR5–18
• 10 Kret MR, Young B, Moneta GL , et al. Results of routine shunting and patch closure during carotid endarterectomy. Am J Surg 2012; 203 (5) 613-617
• 11 Aburahma AF, Stone PA, Hass SM , et al. Prospective randomized trial of routine versus selective shunting in carotid endarterectomy based on stump pressure. J Vasc Surg 2010; 51 (5) 1133-1138
• 12 Frawley JE, Hicks RG, Gray LJ, Niesche JW. Carotid endarterectomy without a shunt for symptomatic lesions associated with contralateral severe stenosis or occlusion. J Vasc Surg 1996; 23 (3) 421-427