Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29(02): 125-130
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329926
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Comparative Study of Two Types of Distally Based Sural Neurocutaneous Flap for Reconstruction of Lower Leg, Ankle, and Heel

Jiezhi Dai
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China
,
Yimin Chai
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China
,
Chunyang Wang
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China
,
Gen Wen
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China
,
Shenghe Liu
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China
,
Wei Zhang
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

28 July 2012

25 August 2012

Publication Date:
31 December 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Soft-tissue defects in the lower leg, ankle, and heel often require reconstruction with local or free flaps. We try to compare the clinical outcome and complications following transfer of a perforator pedicle–based sural neurocutaneous flap (P-NCF) or a fascia pedicle–based sural neurocutaneous flap (F-NCF).

Methods Between March 2007 and December 2010, 92 patients (mean, 36.52 years) with a distal leg soft-tissue defect were included. Forty-eight patients treated with P-NCF were compared with 44 patients treated by F-NCF. The etiology, size, and operation time were noted. The clinical outcomes and the complications have been analyzed.

Results Age, sex, and defect etiology, duration of surgery and, area of flaps did not reveal significant differences in term of clinical outcome. Minor flap necrosis (<10%) was observed in 20.5% of the F-NCF group and 6.25% of the P-NCF group. Patient satisfaction, aesthetic appearance, and functional outcome were comparable in both groups.

Conclusion A high rate of complications was observed in the F-NCF group. Based on our finding, a perforator-based flap is more reliable than a fascia-based flap and the two types of flaps are both valuable choices for reconstructive surgery.

Keywords

distally based sural neurocutaneous flap - soft-tissue defects - reconstruction
 

  • References

  • 1 Pontén B. The fasciocutaneous flap: its use in soft tissue defects of the lower leg. Br J Plast Surg 1981; 34: 215-220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Donski PK, Fogdestam I. Distally based fasciocutaneous flap from the sural region. A preliminary report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 17: 191-196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Masquelet AC, Romana MC, Wolf G. Skin island flaps supplied by the vascular axis of the sensitive superficial nerves: anatomic study and clinical experience in the leg. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89: 1115-1121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Chang SM, Zhang F, Yu GR, Hou CL, Gu YD. Modified distally based peroneal artery perforator flap for reconstruction of foot and ankle. Microsurgery 2004; 24: 430-436
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Koshima I, Soeda S. Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle. Br J Plast Surg 1989; 42: 645-648
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Koshima I, Moriguchi T, Ohta S, Hamanaka T, Inoue T, Ikeda A. The vasculature and clinical application of the posterior tibial perforator-based flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90: 643-649
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kroll SS, Rosenfield L. Perforator-based flaps for low posterior midline defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 81: 561-566
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Chen YL, Zheng BG, Zhu JM , et al. Microsurgical anatomy of the lateral skin flap of the leg. Ann Plast Surg 1985; 15: 313-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Wei FC, Seah CS, Tsai YC, Liu SJ, Tsai MS. Fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap for reconstruction of composite mandibular defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93: 294-304 , discussion 305–306
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Chai YM, Lin CZ, Chen YK, Chen HD, Qiu XY. [Clinical application of sural nerve nutrilional vessel axial flap pedicle with the lowest perforating branch of the peroneal artery]. Zhonghua Xianwei Waike Zazhi 2001; 24: 3
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Wang CY, Chai YM, Wen G , et al. The free peroneal perforator-based sural neurofasciocutaneous flap: a novel tool for reconstruction of large soft-tissue defects in the upper limb. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127: 293-302
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Parodi PC, De Biasio F, Rampino Cordaro E, Guarneri GF, Panizzo N, Riberti C. Distally-based superficial sural flap: advantages of the adipofascial over the fasciocutaneous flap. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2010; 44: 37-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Yang D, Morris SF. Reversed sural island flap supplied by the lower septocutaneous perforator of the peroneal artery. Ann Plast Surg 2002; 49: 375-378
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hasegawa M, Torii S, Katoh H, Esaki S. The distally based superficial sural artery flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93: 1012-1020
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kneser U, Bach AD, Polykandriotis E, Kopp J, Horch RE. Delayed reverse sural flap for staged reconstruction of the foot and lower leg. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116: 1910-1917
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Follmar KE, Baccarani A, Baumeister SP, Levin LS, Erdmann D. The distally based sural flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 138e-148e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Rajacic N, Darweesh M, Jayakrishnan K, Gang RK, Jojic S. The distally based superficial sural flap for reconstruction of the lower leg and foot. Br J Plast Surg 1996; 49: 383-389
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Yilmaz M, Karatas O, Barutcu A. The distally based superficial sural artery island flap: clinical experiences and modifications. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102: 2358-2367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Jeng SF, Wei FC. Distally based sural island flap for foot and ankle reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99: 744-750
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Zhang FH, Chang SM, Lin SQ , et al. Modified distally based sural neuro-veno-fasciocutaneous flap: anatomical study and clinical applications. Microsurgery 2005; 25: 543-550
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Pinsolle V, Reau AF, Pelissier P, Martin D, Baudet J. Soft-tissue reconstruction of the distal lower leg and foot: are free flaps the only choice? Review of 215 cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59: 912-917 , discussion 918
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Schaverien MV, Hamilton SA, Fairburn N, Rao P, Quaba AA. Lower limb reconstruction using the islanded posterior tibial artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125: 1735-1743
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Jindarak S, Khobunsongserm S, Tansatit T. The anatomic basis of fasciocutaneous flap based on the posterior tibial vessels. J Med Assoc Thai 2001; 84 (Suppl. 01) S283-S288
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Gideroglu K, Gunduz OH, Ofluoglu D, Akoz T. Sensorial donor site morbidity after saphenous neurocutaneous flap. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2005; 39: 302-307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Chai Y, Zeng B, Zhang F, Kang Q, Yang Q. Experience with the distally based sural neurofasciocutaneous flap supplied by the terminal perforator of peroneal vessels for ankle and foot reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 59: 526-531
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Yoshimura M, Shimada T, Hosokawa M. The vasculature of the peroneal tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 85: 917-921
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Schaverien M, Saint-Cyr M. Perforators of the lower leg: analysis of perforator locations and clinical application for pedicled perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122: 161-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Heitmann C, Khan FN, Levin LS. Vasculature of the peroneal artery: an anatomic study focused on the perforator vessels. J Reconstr Microsurg 2003; 19: 157-162
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Whetzel TP, Barnard MA, Stokes RB. Arterial fasciocutaneous vascular territories of the lower leg. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100: 1172-1183 , discussion 1184–1185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Schusterman MA, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Harris S. The osteocutaneous free fibula flap: is the skin paddle reliable?. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90: 787-793 , discussion 794–798
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Ozalp T, Masquelet AC, Begue TC. Septocutaneous perforators of the peroneal artery relative to the fibula: anatomical basis of the use of pedicled fasciocutaneous flap. Surg Radiol Anat 2006; 28: 54-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Levante S, Mebtouche N, Molina V, Cottin P, Bégué T. [The distally based sural flap at the ankle and foot: complications analysis in a 27 cases study]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2011; 56: 194-199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Sinna R, Boloorchi A, Mahajan AL, Qassemyar Q, Robbe M. What should define a “perforator flap”?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126: 2258-2263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Chang SM, Hou CL. Role of large superficial veins in distally based flaps of the extremities. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106: 230-231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kneser U, Brockmann S, Leffler M , et al. Comparison between distally based peroneus brevis and sural flaps for reconstruction of foot, ankle and distal lower leg: an analysis of donor-site morbidity and clinical outcome. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64: 656-662
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar