Download PDF
Zentralbl Chir 2014; 139(6): 632-637
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1328216
Originalarbeit
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Postoperative Ergebnisse höhergradiger traumatischer Milzrupturen bei Kindern im Langzeitverlauf

Postoperative Long-Term Results in High-Grade Traumatic Ruptures of the Spleen in Children
M. Weinrich
1   Allgemeine, Thorax-, Gefäß- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Rostock, Deutschland
2   Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Klinikum Worms, Deutschland
,
R. P. Dahmen
1   Allgemeine, Thorax-, Gefäß- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Rostock, Deutschland
2   Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Klinikum Worms, Deutschland
,
K. J. L. Black
3   Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University/IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Canada
,
S. A. Lange
4   Medizinische Klinik I, Kardiologie und Angiologie, Klinikum Worms, Deutschland
,
H. Bindewald
2   Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Klinikum Worms, Deutschland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
21 May 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

-Resektion einschließlich Milzhilus, 1 Hemisplenektomie und 2 kaudale Polresektionen; bei 1 Patienten mit OIS Grad V erfolgte primär eine Splenektomie. Ergebnisse: Bei 1 der 4 die Milz teilerhaltend operierten Patienten (Hemisplenektomie) musste aufgrund einer Nachblutung am 1. postoperativen Tag eine Restsplenektomie durchgeführt werden. Infolge der 2. Operation benötigte dieser Patient 2 Erythrozytenkonzentrate, weitere Komplikationen traten nicht auf. Eine passagere Thrombozytose als Zeichen einer eingeschränkten Clearance-Funktion der Milz entwickelten nur die Patienten mit Splenektomie und ⅔-Resektion. In einer Kontrolluntersuchung (Follow-Up im Median 13 [1–101] Monate) wiesen alle die Milz teilerhaltend operierten Patienten eine große und arteriell perfundierte Restmilz auf. Schlussfolgerung: Der hohe Anteil primär die Milz teilerhaltender Operationen ist im überwiegend vorliegenden Grad IV der Milzrupturen nach dem OIS begründet. Bei ¾ der die Milz teilerhaltend operierten Patienten war dieses Vorgehen erfolgreich. Die niedrige Morbidität sowie die dokumentierte Perfusion der Restmilzen im Langzeitverlauf rechtfertigen ein die Milz erhaltendes Vorgehen auch bei erforderlicher Operation.

Abstract

of the spleen including the splenic vessels, one hemisplenectomy and two lower pole resections; in one patient with an OIS grade V rupture splenectomy was performed immediately. Results: In one patient treated with a spleen-preserving approach (hemisplenectomy) the remainder of the spleen had to be removed due to acute bleeding on the first postoperative day. This patient needed two units of blood transfused following the second operation. There were no other complications. The two patients with splenectomy and resection of ⅔ of the spleen developed a transient thrombocytosis indicating impaired clearance of the spleen. In a follow-up involving ultrasonography (median 13, range 1–101 months) all patients managed with partially spleen-saving surgery showed a large remnant spleen with arterial perfusion. Conclusion: The majority of primarily partially spleen-preserving operations result from OIS grade IV ruptures of the spleen. Use of a partially spleen-saving surgical approach was successful in ¾ of these patients. Low morbidity and documented perfusion of the remnant spleen at long-term follow-up indicate that a spleen-preserving technique is warranted if an operative approach is required.

Schlüsselwörter

Milz - Verletzung - stumpfes Bauchtrauma - Kinderchirurgie - Milzerhalt - immunologische Funktion

Key words

spleen - injury - blunt abdominal trauma - paediatric surgery - salvage of the spleen - immunological function
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Luchtman M, Alfici R, Sternberg E et al. Multimodality management in severe pediatric spleen trauma. Isr Med Assoc J 2000; 2: 523-525
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Pachter HL, Guth AA, Hofstetter SR et al. Changing patterns in the management of splenic trauma: the impact of nonoperative management. Ann Surg 1998; 227: 708-717
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Advanced Life Support Group. Advanced Pediatric Life Support. The Practical Approach. 2nd ed.. London: BMJ Publishing; 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Upadhyaya P. Conservative management of splenic trauma: history and current trends. Pediatr Surg Int 2003; 19: 617-627
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Davis DH, Localio AR, Stafford PW et al. Trends in operative management of pediatric splenic injury in a regional trauma system. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 89-94
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 King H, Shumacker HB. Splenic studies I. Susceptibility to infection after splenectomy performed in infancy. Ann Surg 1952; 136: 239-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Brigden ML, Pattullo AL. Prevention and management of overwhelming postsplenectomy infection – an update. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 836-842
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Moberley SA, Holden J, Tatham DP et al. Vaccines for preventing pneumococcal infection in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; CD000422
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 [Anonym]. Empfehlungen der Ständigen Impfkommission (STIKO) am Robert-Koch-Institut/Stand: Juli 2010. Epidemiol Bull 2010; 30/2010: 279-298
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Törling J, Hedlund J, Konradsen HB et al. Revaccination with the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in middle-aged and elderly persons previously treated for pneumonia. Vaccine 2003; 22: 96-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 [Anonym]. Pneumokokken-Polysaccharid-Impfung – Anpassung der Empfehlung und Begründung. Epidemiol Bull 2009; 32/2009: 337-338
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Jurkovich GJ et al. Organ injury scaling: spleen and liver (1994 revision). J Trauma 1995; 38: 323-324
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Krupnick AS, Teitelbaum DH, Geiger JD et al. Use of abdominal ultrasonography to assess pediatric splenic trauma. Potential pitfalls in the diagnosis. Ann Surg 1997; 225: 408-414
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Umali E, Andrews HG, White JJ. A critical analysis of blood transfusion requirements in children with blunt abdominal trauma. Am Surg 1992; 58: 736-739
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Haß HJ, Meyer F, Wagemann W et al. Milz, kindliches Milztrauma sowie Milzerhalt. Viszeralchirurgie 2005; 40: 297-302
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Jacobs IA, Kelly K, Valenziano C et al. Nonoperative management of blunt splenic and hepatic trauma in the pediatric population: significant differences between adult and pediatric surgeons?. Am Surg 2001; 67: 149-154
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Potoka DA, Schall LC, Ford HR. Risk factors for splenectomy in children with blunt splenic trauma. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37: 294-299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Holmes 4th JH, Wiebe DJ, Tataria M et al. The failure of nonoperative management in pediatric solid organ injury: a multi-institutional experience. J Trauma 2005; 59: 1309-1313
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Mooney DP, Rothstein DH, Forbes PW. Variation in the management of pediatric splenic injuries in the United States. J Trauma 2006; 61: 330-333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Jim J, Leonardi MJ, Cryer HG et al. Management of high-grade splenic injury in children. Am Surg 2008; 74: 988-992
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Jen HC, Tillou A, Cryer 3rd HG et al. Disparity in management and long-term outcomes of pediatric splenic injury in California. Ann Surg 2010; 251: 1162-1166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Stylianos S, Ford HR. Outcomes in pediatric trauma care. Sem Pediatr Surg 2008; 17: 110-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Feigin E, Aharonson-Daniel L, Savitsky B et al. Conservative approach to the treatment of injured liver and spleen in children: association with reduced mortality. Pediatr Surg Int 2009; 25: 583-586
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Bowman SM, Zimmerman FJ, Christakis DA et al. Hospital characteristics associated with the management of pediatric splenic injuries. JAMA 2005; 294: 2611-2617
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Bowman SM, Zimmerman FJ, Christakis DA et al. The role of hospital profit status in pediatric spleen injury management. Med Care 2008; 46: 331-338
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hunt JP, Lentz CW, Cairns BA et al. Management and outcome of splenic injury: the results of a five-year statewide population-based study. Am Surg 1996; 62: 911-917
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Powell M, Courcoulas A, Gardner M et al. Management of blunt splenic trauma: significant differences between adults and children. Surgery 1997; 122: 654-660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Mooney DP, Forbes PW. Variation in the management of pediatric splenic injuries in New England. J Trauma 2004; 56: 328-333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Stylianos S, Egorova N, Guice KS et al. Variation in treatment of pediatric spleen injury at trauma centers versus nontrauma centers: a call for dissemination of American Pediatric Surgical Association benchmarks and guidelines. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 202: 247-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Bowman SM, Bulger E, Sharar SR et al. Variability in pediatric splenic injury care: results of a national survey of general surgeons. Arch Surg 2010; 145: 1048-1053
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Sims CA, Wiebe DJ, Nance ML. Blunt solid organ injury: do adult and pediatric surgeons treat children differently?. J Trauma 2008; 65: 698-703
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 van der Vlies CH, Saltzherr TP, Wilde JC et al. The failure rate of nonoperative management in children with splenic or liver injury with contrast blush on computed tomography: a systematic review. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45: 1044-1049
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Godbole P, Stringer MD. Splenectomy after pediatric trauma: could more spleens be preserved?. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2002; 84: 106-108
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Kristoffersen KW, Mooney DP. Long-term outcome of nonoperative pediatric splenic injury management. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42: 1038-1041
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Paya K, Wurm J, Graf M et al. Intrasplenic posttraumatic pseudoaneurysm secondary to spleen-salvaging surgery. J Trauma 2002; 52: 783-785
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Keramidas DC, Soutis M. The function of the spleen in adults after ligation of the splenic artery of the traumatized spleen in childhood. Surgery 2003; 133: 583-585
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Goldthorn JF, Schwartz AD, Swift AJ et al. Protective effect of residual splenic tissue after subtotal splenectomy. J Pediatr Surg 1978; 6: 587-590
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Scher KS, Scott-Conner C, Jones CW et al. Methods of splenic preservation and their effect on clearance of pneumococcal bacteremia. Ann Surg 1985; 202: 595-599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Malangoni MA, Dawes LG, Droege EA et al. Splenic phagocytic function after partial splenectomy and splenic autotransplantation. Arch Surg 1985; 120: 275-278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Müftüoğlu TM, Köksal N, Ozkutlu D. Evaluation of phagocytic function of macrophages in rats after partial splenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2000; 191: 668-671
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Gürleyik E, Gürleyik G, Ozkutlu D. Immune function of the upper splenic remnant supplied by short gastric vessels. Eur J Surg 1999; 165: 897-902
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Van Wyck DB, Witte MH, Witte CL et al. Critical splenic mass for survival from experimental pneumococcemia. J Surg Res 1980; 28: 14-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Treutner KH, Bertram P, Schumpelick V. Prinzipien der Milzerhaltung beim stumpfen Bauchtrauma. Chirurg 1993; 64: 860-886
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Waghorn DJ. Overwhelming infection in asplenic patients: current best practice preventive measures are not being followed. J Clin Pathol 2001; 54: 214-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 El-Alfy MS, El-Sayed MH. Overwhelming postsplenectomy infection: is quality of patient knowledge enough for prevention?. Hematol J 2004; 5: 77-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar