Decompression alone versus decompression with limited fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis in the elderly patient

ABSTRACT

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: To analyze the surgical results of a group of patients older than 65 years treated for mild degenerative lumbar scoliosis (<30°) with stenosis, treated with decompression alone or decompression and limited fusion.

Methods: We evaluated 55 patients, all older than 65 years from our prospectively collected database with mild degenerative scoliosis (<30°) and stenosis who underwent surgery. Laminectomy alone was performed in 16 patients, and laminectomy and limited fusion in 39 patients. Mean follow-up was 4.6 years in the decompression group and 5.0 years in the fusion group. Clinical results were graded by patients’ self-reported satisfaction and length of symptom-free period to recurrence.

Results: In the decompression alone group, 6 (37%) of 16 patients developed recurrent stenosis at the previously decompressed level and five developed recurrence within 6 months postoperatively versus the decompression and fusion group where 3 (8%) of 39 (P = .0476) developed symptomatic stenosis supra adjacent to the fusion. Of 16 patients in the decompression alone group, 12 (75%) had recurrence of symptoms by the 5-year follow-up period versus only 14 (36%) patients in the decompression and fusion group (P = .016). Adjacent segment degenerative changes were common in the fusion group, but only 7% developed symptomatic stenosis.

Conclusions: Decompression with limited fusion prevents early return of stenotic symptoms compared with decompression alone in the setting of mild degenerative scoliosis (<30°) and symptomatic stenosis in patients 65 years and older.

Final class of evidence—prognosis
Study design
RCT
Cohort	•
Case control
Case series
Methods
Concealed allocation (RCT)
Intention to treat (RCT)
Blinded/independent evaluation of primary outcome
F/U ≥ 85%	•
Adequate sample size
Control for confounding
Overall class of evidence	III

The definiton of the different classes of evidence is available here.

• REFERENCES

• 1 Marchesi DG, Aebi M. 1992; Pedicle fixation devices in the treatment of adult lumbar scoliosis. Spine 17 (Suppl. 08) 304-309
• 2 Simmons Jr ED, Simmons EH. 1992; Spinal stenosis with scoliosis. Spine 17 (Suppl. 06) 117-120
• 3 Carreon LY, Puno RM, Dimar 2nd JR et al. 2003; Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A (11) 2089-2092
• 4 Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN et al. 2004; Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A (7) 1497-1503
• 5 Berven SH, Deviren V, Mitchell B et al. 2007; Operative management of degenerative scoliosis: an evidence-based approach to surgical strategies based on clinical and radiographic outcomes. Neurosurg Clin N Am 18 (2) 261-272
• 6 Kostuik J, Bridwell KH, DeWald RL. 1997. Adult scoliosis: the lumbar spine. The Textbook of Spinal Surgery. 2nd ed Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 767-775
• 7 Grubb SA, Lipscomb HJ, Suh PB. 1994; Results of surgical treatment of painful adult scoliosis. Spine 19 (14) 1619-1627
• 8 Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC et al. 2004; Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine 29 (17) 1938-1944