Download PDF
Zentralbl Chir 2013; 138(3): 289-294
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1328006
Originalarbeit
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Stellenwert der einzeitigen chirurgischen Therapie bei diffuser Peritonitis (Relaparotomie „on demand“): eine unizentrische Analyse

Value of One-Stage Surgical Treatment of Diffuse Peritonitis (Relaparotomy on Demand): A Single-Center Analysis
S. Pauly
1   Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Deutschland
,
F. P. Schulze
2   Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, St. Marien-Hospital, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Deutschland
,
O. Horstmann
3   Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Endokrine Chirurgie, Städtische Kliniken Mönchengladbach, Deutschland
,
H. Becker
4   Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Deutschland
,
M. Grade   *
4   Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Deutschland
,
M. Ghadimi   *
4   Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Deutschland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 April 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Die diffuse Peritonitis ist ungeachtet moderner chirurgischer und intensivmedizinischer Therapieverfahren eine Erkrankung mit hoher Morbidität und Mortalität. Ziel dieser Arbeit war es, im eigenen Krankengut den Stellenwert der Relaparotomie „on demand“ (ROD) bei Patienten mit diffuser Peritonitis kritisch zu evaluieren. Patienten und Ergebnisse: In einer retrospektiven Untersuchung wurden die Therapieverläufe von 231 Patienten mit diffuser Peritonitis analysiert. Diese wiesen einen durchschnittlichen Mannheimer Peritonitis-Index (MPI) von 25,3 auf. Die Gesamtletalität im untersuchten Kollektiv betrug 14,3 %. Bei 214 Patienten gelang während der Indexoperation eine suffiziente Fokussanierung, sodass diese im Rahmen des ROD-Konzepts weiterbehandelt wurden. Bei 178 dieser Patienten bestand keine Notwendigkeit einer Reoperation, während 36 dieser Patienten im weiteren Verlauf relaparotomiert wurden. Die Letalität dieser beiden Subgruppen betrug 9 % (keine Relaparotomie) bzw. 27 % (Relaparotomie). Schlussfolgerung: Anhand des untersuchten Kollektivs zeigt sich, dass das Konzept der Relaparotomie „on demand“ nach effektiver Herdsanierung und entsprechender suffizienter Lavage im klinischen Alltag sinnvoll und praktikabel ist. Allerdings besteht weiterhin die dringliche Notwendigkeit, Parameter zu identifizieren, welche die Selektion von Patienten zur Relaparotomie vereinfachen.

Abstract

Background: Despite modern surgical and intensive-care concepts, diffuse peritonitis remains a major source of high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to critically evaluate the value of relaparotomy on demand (ROD) for patients with diffuse peritonitis. Patients and Results: In a retrospective analysis, the clinical course of 231 patients with diffuse peritonitis was analysed. The mean Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) was 25.3. Overall lethality in this cohort was 14.3 %. In 214 patients, source control was successful during the index operation, and these patients were treated according to an on-demand strategy. For 178 of these patients, there was no demand for a relaparotomy, whereas 36 of these patients required further surgical interventions. Lethality for these subgroups was 9 % (no relaparotomy) and 27 % (relaparotomy), respectively. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis confirms that an on-demand strategy is reasonable and feasible after successful source control and lavage. However, it still remains of clinical importance to identify parameters that may assist in selecting those patients who require a relaparotomy.

Schlüsselwörter

diffuse Peritonitis - Sepsis - Letalität - chirurgische Therapie - Relaparotomie on Demand

Key words

diffuse peritonitis - Sepsis - lethality - surgical therapy - relaparotomy on demand

* Beide Autoren haben zu gleichen Teilen zum Entstehen der Arbeit beigetragen.


 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Hau T. Bacteria, toxins, and the peritoneum. World J Surg 1990; 14: 167-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wickel DJ, Cheadle WG, Mercer-Jones MA et al. Poor outcome from peritonitis is caused by disease acuity and organ failure, not recurrent peritoneal infection. Ann Surg 1997; 225: 744-753 discussion 753–756
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Marshall JC. Clinical trials of mediator-directed therapy in sepsis: what have we learned?. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26 Suppl 1: S75-S83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Mikulicz J. Weitere Erfahrungen über die operative Behandlung der Perforationsperitonitis. Arch Klin Chir (Berl) 1889; 39: 756-784
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kirschner M. Die Behandlung der akuten eitrigen freien Bauchfellentzündung. Langenbecks Arch Chir 1926; 142: 253-257
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Lamme B, Mahler CW, van Till JW et al. [Relaparotomy in secondary peritonitis planned relaparotomy or relaparotomy on demand?]. Chirurg 2005; 76: 856-867
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Strobel O, Werner J, Buchler MW. Chirurgische Therapie der Peritonitis. Chirurg 2011; 82: 242-248
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Penninckx FM, Kerremans RP, Lauwers PM. Planned relaparotomies in the surgical treatment of severe generalized peritonitis from intestinal origin. World J Surg 1983; 7: 762-766
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hau T, Ohmann C, Wolmershauser A et al. Planned relaparotomy vs. relaparotomy on demand in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. The Peritonitis Study Group of the Surgical Infection Society-Europe. Arch Surg 1995; 130: 1193-1196 discussion 1196–1197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Teichmann W, Wittmann DH, Andreone PA. Scheduled reoperations (etappenlavage) for diffuse peritonitis. Arch Surg 1986; 121: 147-152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Rotstein OD, Meakins JL. Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of intraabdominal infections. World J Surg 1990; 14: 159-166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Wittmann DH, Schein M, Condon RE. Management of secondary peritonitis. Ann Surg 1996; 224: 10-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Beger HG, Krautzberger W, Bittner R. Die Therapie der diffusen, bakteriellen Peritonitis mit kontinuierlicher postoperativer Peritoneal-Lavage. Chirurg 1983; 54: 311-315
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Pichlmayr R, Weimann A, Klempnauer J. Kontinuierliche Spülung oder Etappenlavage bei Peritonitis. Chirurg 1992; 63: 162-168
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hallerback B, Andersson C, Englund N et al. A prospective randomized study of continuous peritoneal lavage postoperatively in the treatment of purulent peritonitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1986; 163: 433-436
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Mughal MM, Bancewicz J, Irving MH. ‘Laparostomy : a technique for the management of intractable intra-abdominal sepsis. Br J Surg 1986; 73: 253-259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Schein M. Planned reoperations and open management in critical intra-abdominal infections: prospective experience in 52 cases. World J Surg 1991; 15: 537-545
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Bosscha K, Hulstaert PF, Visser MR et al. Open management of the abdomen and planned reoperations in severe bacterial peritonitis. Eur J Surg 2000; 166: 44-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Teichmann W, Pohland C, Mansfeld T et al. [Peritonitis : Attempt to evaluate therapeutic surgical options.]. Chirurg 2008; 79: 282-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Dellinger EP. Timing of reoperation for patients with severe peritonitis. JAMA 2007; 298: 923-924
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lamme B, Boermeester MA, de Vos R et al. Survey among surgeons on surgical treatment strategies for secondary peritonitis. Dig Surg 2004; 21: 387-394 discussion 394–395
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Seiler CA, Brugger L, Forssmann U et al. Conservative surgical treatment of diffuse peritonitis. Surgery 2000; 127: 178-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Linder MM, Wacha H, Feldmann U et al. [The Mannheim peritonitis index. An instrument for the intraoperative prognosis of peritonitis]. Chirurg 1987; 58: 84-92
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Fugger R, Rogy M, Herbst F et al. [Validation study of the Mannheim Peritonitis Index]. Chirurg 1988; 59: 598-601
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Billing A, Frohlich D, Schildberg FW. Prediction of outcome using the Mannheim peritonitis index in 2003 patients. Peritonitis Study Group. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 209-213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bosscha K, Reijnders K, Hulstaert PF et al. Prognostic scoring systems to predict outcome in peritonitis and intra-abdominal sepsis. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 1532-1534
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Gotzinger P, Gebhard B, Wamser P et al. [Revision of diffuse peritonitis: planned versus on demand]. Langenbecks Arch Chir 1996; 381: 343-347
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Lamme B, Boermeester MA, Reitsma JB et al. Meta-analysis of relaparotomy for secondary peritonitis. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 1516-1524
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Lamme B, Boermeester MA, Belt EJ et al. Mortality and morbidity of planned relaparotomy versus relaparotomy on demand for secondary peritonitis. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 1046-1054
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Rakic M, Popovic D, Druzijanic N et al. Comparison of on-demand vs. planned relaparotomy for treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections. Croat Med J 2005; 46: 957-963
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 van Ruler O, Mahler CW, Boer KR et al. Comparison of on-demand vs. planned relaparotomy strategy in patients with severe peritonitis: a randomized trial. JAMA 2007; 298: 865-872
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Opmeer BC, Boer KR, van Ruler O et al. Costs of relaparotomy on-demand versus planned relaparotomy in patients with severe peritonitis: an economic evaluation within a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2010; 14: R97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Koperna T, Schulz F. Prognosis and treatment of peritonitis. Do we need new scoring systems?. Arch Surg 1996; 131: 180-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Adam U, Ledwon D, Hopt UT. [Programmed lavage as a basic principle in therapy of diffuse peritonitis]. Langenbecks Arch Chir 1997; 382: S18-S21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Teichmann W, Herbig B. [Therapy principles in diffuse peritonitis]. Chirurg 2000; 71: 120-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 van Goor H, Hulsebos RG, Bleichrodt RP. Complications of planned relaparotomy in patients with severe general peritonitis. Eur J Surg 1997; 163: 61-66
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 van Ruler O, Lamme B, Gouma DJ et al. Variables associated with positive findings at relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 468-476
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Schein M. Surgical management of intra-abdominal infection: is there any evidence?. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2002; 387: 1-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Cinat ME, Wilson SE, Din AM. Determinants for successful percutaneous image-guided drainage of intra-abdominal abscess. Arch Surg 2002; 137: 845-849
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Benoist S, Panis Y, Pannegeon V et al. Can failure of percutaneous drainage of postoperative abdominal abscesses be predicted?. Am J Surg 2002; 184: 148-153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Bartels H, Barthlen W, Siewert JR. [The therapeutic results of programmed relaparotomy in diffuse peritonitis]. Chirurg 1992; 63: 174-180
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Billing A, Frohlich D, Mialkowskyj O et al. [Treatment of peritonitis with staged lavage: prognostic criteria and course of treatment]. Langenbecks Arch Chir 1992; 377: 305-313
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Koperna T, Schulz F. Relaparotomy in peritonitis: prognosis and treatment of patients with persisting intraabdominal infection. World J Surg 2000; 24: 32-37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Holzheimer RG, Gathof B. Re-operation for complicated secondary peritonitis – how to identify patients at risk for persistent sepsis. Eur J Med Res 2003; 8: 125-134
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Baue AE. Recovery from multiple organ failure. Am J Surg 1985; 149: 420-421
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar