Clinical outcomes and risk factors of post-polypectomy coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, retrospective, case–control study

Background and study aims: Post-polypectomy coagulation syndrome (PPCS) is a well known complication of colonoscopic polypectomy. However, no previous studies have reported on the clinical outcomes or risk factors of PPCS. The aim of the current study was to analyze the clinical outcomes and risk factors of PPCS developing after a colonoscopic polypectomy.

Patients and methods: Data for all patients who underwent colonoscopic polypectomies and required hospitalization in nine university hospitals were analyzed retrospectively. The incidence, clinicopathological characteristics, and clinical outcomes of PPCS cases were examined. Additionally, patients who developed PPCS were compared with controls who were matched by age and sex, in order to assess for possible risk factors.

Results: The rate of PPCS that required hospitalization after colonoscopic polypectomy was 0.7/1000. All patients with PPCS were treated medically without the need for surgical interventions. The median durations of therapeutic fasting, hospitalization, and antibiotic use were 3 days, 5.5 days, and 7 days, respectively. The rates of major PPCS and mortality were 2.9 % and 0 %, respectively. On multivariate analysis, hypertension (OR = 3.023, 95 %CI 1.034 – 8.832), large lesion size (OR = 2.855, 95 %CI 1.027 – 7.937), and non-polypoid configuration (OR = 3.332, 95 %CI 1.029 – 10.791) were found to be independent risk factors related to the development of PPCS. 

Conclusions: In this study, the rates of major PPCS and mortality were only 2.9 % and 0 %, respectively. Hypertension, large lesion size, and non-polypoid configuration of the lesion were independently associated with PPCS. Therefore, patients may be reassured by the excellent prognosis of PPCS, while endoscopists should be especially careful when performing colonoscopic polypectomies in patients with hypertension or large and non-polypoid lesions.

• References

• 1 Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN. The National Polyp Study Workgroup et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1977-1981
• 2 Parra-Blanco A, Kaminaga N, Kojima T et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy with cutting current: is it safe?. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 676-681
• 3 Gibbs DH, Opelka FG, Beck DE et al. Postpolypectomy colonic hemorrhage. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 806-810
• 4 Rosen L, Bub DS, Reed 3rd JF et al. Hemorrhage following colonoscopic polypectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 1126-1131
• 5 Nivatvongs S. Complications in colonoscopic polypectomy. An experience with 1,555 polypectomies. Dis Colon Rectum 1986; 29: 825-830
• 6 Webb WA, McDaniel L, Jones L. Experience with 1000 colonoscopic polypectomies. Ann Surg 1985; 201: 626-632
• 7 Heldwein W, Dollhopf M, Rösch T et al. The Munich Polypectomy Study (MUPS): prospective analysis of complications and risk factors in 4000 colonic snare polypectomy. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 1116-1122
• 8 Arora G, Mannalithara A, Singh G et al. Risk of perforation from a colonoscopy in adults: a large population-based study. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 654-664
• 9 Watabe H, Yamaji Y, Okamoto M et al. Risk assessment for delayed hemorrhagic complications of colonic polypectomy: polyp-related factors and patient-related factors. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 73-78
• 10 Tolliver KA, Rex DK. Colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2008; 37: 229-251
• 11 Waye JD. Management of complications of colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterologist 1993; 1: 158-164
• 12 Waye JD, Lewis BS, Yessayan S. Colonoscopy: a prospective report of complications. J Clin Gastroenterol 1992; 15: 347-351
• 13 Waye JD, Kahn O, Auerbach ME. Complications of colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1996; 6: 343-377
• 14 Christie JP, Marrazzo 3rd J. “Mini-perforation” of the colon – not all postpolypectomy perforations require laparotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 132-135
• 15 Nivatvongs S. Complications in colonoscopic polypectomy: lessons to learn from an experience with 1576 polyps. Am Surg 1988; 54: 61-63
• 16 Nelson DB, McQuaid KR, Bond JH et al. Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 307-314
• 17 The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 3-43
• 18 Schlemper RJ, Hirata I, Dixon MF. The macroscopic classification of early neoplasia of the digestive tract. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 163-168
• 19 Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA eds. World Health Organization classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of tumors of the digestive system. 1st. edn. Lyon: IARC Press; 2000: 103-143
• 20 Kurome M, Kato J, Nawa T et al. Risk factors for high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma in colorectal adenoma cases treated with endoscopic polypectomy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 20: 111-117
• 21 Schlemper RJ, Itabashi M, Kato Y et al. Differences in the diagnostic criteria used by Japanese and Western pathologists to diagnose colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 1998; 82: 60-69
• 22 Egashira K, Inou T, Hirooka Y et al. Imparied coronary blood flow response to acetylcholine in patients with coronary risk factors and proximal atherosclerotic lesions. J Clin Invest 1993; 91: 29-37
• 23 Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis – an update. N Engl J Med 1986; 314: 488-500
• 24 MacMahon S, Peto R, Cutler J et al. Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 1, Prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias. Lancet 1990; 335: 765-774