PDF herunterladen
J Knee Surg 2013; 26(03): 155-160
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1324808
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Effect of Interference Screw Fixation on ACL Graft Tensile Strength

Gregory A. Sawyer
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brown Medical School, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
,
Brett C. Anderson
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, United States Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, Colorado
,
David Paller
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brown Medical School, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
,
Wendell Malcolm Rogan Heard
3   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
,
Paul D. Fadale
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brown Medical School, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

21. November 2011

27. Juni 2012

Publikationsdatum:
21. September 2012 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Tibial-sided fixation of soft tissue grafts in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has often been identified as the weak link in the fixation construct, with interference screws being a commonly used technique. A significant concern surrounding the use of interference screws for soft tissue fixation is graft laceration and the possibility of loss of pull-out strength and slippage. The act of interference screw insertion for soft tissue graft fixation in ACL reconstruction alters the biomechanical properties of the graft. Two groups of 12 porcine knees (24 total) were utilized for the tibial-sided fixation of porcine flexor digitorum tendons using single-insertion interference screws, in a model of soft tissue ACL reconstruction. Two different screw types were used for comparison. Following screw insertion, the grafts were dissected free and underwent biomechanical testing in tension to failure. Control flexor digitorum tendons underwent the same biomechanical testing for comparison. Control soft tissue grafts exhibited significantly higher yield load, ultimate load, and stiffness (p < 0.001) in comparison to both groups of treated grafts, without evidence of significant macroscopic damage. Single insertion of interference screws for soft tissue graft fixation in ACL reconstruction weakens the biomechanical properties of the graft itself.

Keywords

anterior cruciate ligament - reconstruction - laceration - interference screw
 

  • References

  • 1 Griffin LY, Albohm MJ, Arendt EA , et al. Understanding and preventing noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a review of the Hunt Valley II meeting, January 2005. Am J Sports M 2006; 34 (9) 1512-1535
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Paxton ES, Kymes SM, Brophy RH. Cost-effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a preliminary comparison of single-bundle and double-bundle techniques. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (12) 2417-2425
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Greenberg DD, Robertson M, Vallurupalli S, White RA, Allen WC. Allograft compared with autograft infection rates in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (14) 2402-2408
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. National Hospital Discharge Survey. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1996
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Boden BP, Dean GS, Feagin Jr JA, Garrett Jr WE. Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Orthopedics 2000; 23 (6) 573-578
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Arendt E, Dick R. Knee injury patterns among men and women in collegiate basketball and soccer. NCAA data and review of literature. Am J Sports Med 1995; 23 (6) 694-701
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Frobell RB, Roos EM, Roos HP, Ranstam J, Lohmander LS. A randomized trial of treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tears. N Engl J Med 2010; 363 (4) 331-342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Burnett II QM, Fowler PJ. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: historical overview. Orthop Clin North Am 1985; 16 (1) 143-157
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Prodromos CC, Fu FH, Howell SM, Johnson DH, Lawhorn K. Controversies in soft-tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: grafts, bundles, tunnels, fixation, and harvest. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008; 16 (7) 376-384
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Fu FH, Bennett CH, Lattermann C, Ma CB. Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part 1: Biology and biomechanics of reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1999; 27 (6) 821-830
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Brand Jr JC, Pienkowski D, Steenlage E, Hamilton D, Johnson DL, Caborn DN. Interference screw fixation strength of a quadrupled hamstring tendon graft is directly related to bone mineral density and insertion torque. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28 (5) 705-710
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Micucci CJ, Frank DA, Kompel J, Muffly M, Demeo PJ, Altman GT. The effect of interference screw diameter on fixation of soft-tissue grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2010; 26 (8) 1105-1110
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kohn D, Rose C. Primary stability of interference screw fixation. Influence of screw diameter and insertion torque. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22 (3) 334-338
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Brand Jr J, Weiler A, Caborn DNM, Brown Jr CH, Johnson DL. Graft fixation in cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28 (5) 761-774
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Harvey A, Thomas NP, Amis AA. Fixation of the graft in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87 (5) 593-603
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Stadelmaier DM, Lowe WR, Ilahi OA, Noble PC, Kohl III HW. Cyclic pull-out strength of hamstring tendon graft fixation with soft tissue interference screws. Influence of screw length. Am J Sports Med 1999; 27 (6) 778-783
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Pinczewski LA, Clingeleffer AJ, Otto DD, Bonar SF, Corry IS. Integration of hamstring tendon graft with bone in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 1997; 13 (5) 641-643
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Rodeo SA, Arnoczky SP, Torzilli PA, Hidaka C, Warren RF. Tendon-healing in a bone tunnel. A biomechanical and histological study in the dog. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75 (12) 1795-1803
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Zantop T, Weimann A, Schmidtko R, Herbort M, Raschke MJ, Petersen W. Graft laceration and pullout strength of soft-tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: in vitro study comparing titanium, poly-d,l-lactide, and poly-d,l-lactide-tricalcium phosphate screws. Arthroscopy 2006; 22 (11) 1204-1210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Giurea M, Zorilla P, Amis AA, Aichroth P. Comparative pull-out and cyclic-loading strength tests of anchorage of hamstring tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1999; 27 (5) 621-625
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Weiler A, Hoffmann RF, Stähelin AC, Helling HJ, Südkamp NP. Biodegradable implants in sports medicine: the biological base. Arthroscopy 2000; 16 (3) 305-321
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hospodar SJ, Miller MD. Controversies in ACL reconstruction: bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains the gold standard. Sports Med Arthrosc 2009; 17 (4) 242-246
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Spindler KP, Kuhn JE, Freedman KB, Matthews CE, Dittus RS, Harrell Jr FE. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft choice: bone-tendon-bone versus hamstring: does it really matter? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32 (8) 1986-1995
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lee GH, McCulloch P, Cole BJ, Bush-Joseph CA, Bach Jr BR. The incidence of acute patellar tendon harvest complications for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2008; 24 (2) 162-166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Tay GH, Warrier SK, Marquis G. Indirect patella fractures following ACL reconstruction: a review. Acta Orthop 2006; 77 (3) 494-500
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Pinczewski LA, Lyman J, Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Roe J, Linklater J. A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (4) 564-574
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Colvin A, Sharma C, Parides M, Glashow J. What is the best femoral fixation of hamstring autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (4) 1075-1081
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Halewood C, Hirschmann MT, Newman S, Hleihil J, Chaimski G, Amis AA. The fixation strength of a novel ACL soft-tissue graft fixation device compared with conventional interference screws: a biomechanical study in vitro. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (4) 559-567
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Weiler A, Hoffmann RFG, Siepe CJ, Kolbeck SF, Südkamp NP. The influence of screw geometry on hamstring tendon interference fit fixation. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28 (3) 356-359
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Ishibashi Y, Rudy TW, Livesay GA, Stone JD, Fu FH, Woo SLY. The effect of anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation site at the tibia on knee stability: evaluation using a robotic testing system. Arthroscopy 1997; 13 (2) 177-182
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Weiler A, Hoffmann RFG, Stähelin AC, Bail HJ, Siepe CJ, Südkamp NP. Hamstring tendon fixation using interference screws: a biomechanical study in calf tibial bone. Arthroscopy 1998; 14 (1) 29-37
    Google Scholar