Does the Third Cervical Vertebra Need to be Rimmed for Odontoid Screwing? A Hypothetical Study of Anatomic Landmarks^[*]

Abstract

Background The superoanterior portion of the third cervical vertebra may need to be rimmed during anterior odontoid screw fixation procedures. We, therefore, retrospectively evaluated radiological data to analyze the anatomical relation between the second and third cervical vertebra of the patients who were operated by an anterior cervical approach with respect to the question if odontoid screw fixation would have been possible without rimming or not.

Patients and methods Patients in whom the anterior approach for cervical disc prolapse and/or cervical stenosis was used between 2008 and 2010 were included in this study. The odontoid screw angle, and the angle between the lower second and the upper third cervical vertebral endplate were measured on intraoperative cervical lateral radiographs. If the screw line passed through the superior anterior portion of the third vertebral body, it was determined that the third cervical vertebra would have been needed to be rimmed if odontoid screwing would have been planned.

Results 100 patients were included. There were 50 males and 50 females with a mean age of 47.9 years (mean ± SD: 47.9 ± 12.6 years). The mean odontoid screw angle, and the angle between the lower second and the upper third cervical vertebral endplate were 65.61° ± 3.75° and 15.24° ± 4.85° (nonparallel vertebral endplates only), respectively. The odontoid screw angle, in which the third cervical vertebra would not have been needed to be rimmed, was 63.87° ± 2.84°. In addition, the odontoid screw angle in which the third cervical vertebra would have been needed to be rimmed was 67.28° ± 3.77°.

Conclusion The odontoid screw angle may be easily measured on lateral radiographs. In cases in which the odontoid screw angle is 67.28° ± 3.77° or higher, the superoanterior portion of the third cervical vertebra would be needed to be rimmed for proper screw fixation of odontoid fractures.

Keywords

cervical vertebra - odontoid - radiograph - screw fixation

^* This article was originally published online in Central European Neurosurgery on January 23, 2012 (DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1291206)

• References

• 1 Althoff B. Fracture of the odontoid process. An experimental and clinical study. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1979; 177: 1-95
• 2 Anderson LD, D'Alonzo RT. Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974; 56: 1663-1674
• 3 Andersson S, Rodrigues M, Olerud C. Odontoid fractures: high complication rate associated with anterior screw fixation in the elderly. Eur Spine J 2000; 9: 56-59
• 4 Apfelbaum RI, Lonser RR, Veres R , et al. Direct anterior screw fixation for recent and remote odontoid fractures. J Neurosurg 2000; 93: 227-236
• 5 Bellabarda C, Chapman JR. Odontoid Screw Insertion. In: Vaccaro AR, Bono CM, , eds. Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. 2^nd ed. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2007: 135-147
• 6 Böhler J. Anterior stabilization for acute fractures and non-unions of the dens. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64: 18-27
• 7 Borne GM, Bedou GL, Pinaudeau M , et al. Odontoid process fracture osteosynthesis with a direct screw fixation technique in nine consecutive cases. J Neurosurg 1988; 68: 223-226
• 8 Brooks AL, Jenkins EB. Atlanto-axial arthrodesis by the wedge compression method. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978; 60: 279-284
• 9 Dailey AT, Hart D, Finn MA , et al. Anterior fixation of odontoid fractures in an elderly population. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 12: 1-8
• 10 Dickson H, Engel S, Blum P , et al. Odontoid fractures, systemic disease and conservative care. Aust NZ J Surg 1984; 54: 243-247
• 11 Dunn ME, Seljeskog EL. Experience in the management of odontoid process injuries: an analysis of 128 cases. Neurosurgery 1986; 18: 306-310
• 12 Greene KA, Dickman CA, Marciano FF , et al. Acute axis fractures. Analysis of management and outcome in 340 consecutive cases. Spine 1997; 22: 1843-1852
• 13 Hadley MN, Dickman CA, Browner CM , et al. Acute axis fractures: a review of 229 cases. J Neurosurg 1989; 71: 642-647
• 14 Harms J, Melcher RP. Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine 2001; 26: 2467-2471
• 15 Jeanneret B, Magerl F. Primary posterior fusion C1/2 in odontoid fractures: indications, technique, and results of transarticular screw fixation. J Spinal Disord 1992; 5: 464-475
• 16 Julien TD, Frankel B, Traynelis VC , et al. Evidence-based analysis of odontoid fracture management. Neurosurg Focus 2000; 8: e1
• 17 Lee SH, Sung JK. Anterior odontoid fixation using a 4.5-mm Herbert screw: The first report of 20 consecutive cases with odontoid fracture. Surg Neurol 2006; 66: 361-366
• 18 Omeis I, Duggal N, Rubano J , et al. Surgical treatment of C2 fractures in the elderly: a multicenter retrospective analysis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009; 22: 91-95
• 19 Pryputniewicz DM, Hadley MN. Axis fractures. Neurosurgery 2010; 66: 68-82
• 20 Rockswold GL, Bergman TA, Ford SE. Halo immobilization and surgical fusion: relative indications and effectiveness in the treatment of 140 cervical spine injuries. J Trauma 1990; 30: 893-898
• 21 Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Judet T , et al. Factors of severity in the fractures of the odontoid process. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1980; 66: 183-186
• 22 Seybold EA, Bayley JC. Functional outcome of surgically and conservatively managed dens fractures. Spine 1998; 23: 1837-1845
• 23 Subach BR, Morone MA, Haid Jr RW , et al. Management of acute odontoid fractures with single-screw anterior fixation. Neurosurgery 1999; 45: 812-819
• 24 Tun K, Kaptanoglu E, Cemil B , et al. Anatomical study of axis for odontoid screw thickness, length, and angle. Eur Spine J 2009; 18: 271-275
• 25 Vaccaro AR, Madigan L, Ehrler DM. Contemporary management of adult cervical odontoid fractures. Orthopedics 2000; 23: 1109-1113
• 26 Vieweg U, Schultheiss R. A review of halo vest treatment of upper cervical spine injuries. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2001; 121: 50-55
• 27 Ziai WC, Hurlbert RJ. A six year review of odontoid fractures: the emerging role of surgical intervention. Can J Neurol Sci 2000; 27: 297-301