Facial Plast Surg 2012; 28(02): 145-151
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1313366
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Structural Support and Dynamics at the Tip

J. Jared Christophel
1   Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
,
Stephen S. Park
1   Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 May 2012 (online)

Abstract

Controlled surgical alteration of the nasal tip remains one of the most difficult aspects of rhinoplasty. The appearance of the nasal tip depends on the underlying anatomy, and the long-term resultant anatomy depends on the structural dynamics and healing process. Many methods have been devised for altering the nasal tip and all do so via their ultimate effect on nasal tip structure and dynamics. This article summarizes the history of nasal tip structural and dynamic theories, reviews the fundamental effects of standard maneuvers on tip position and form, and finally discusses state of the art theories that synthesize classical thought and modern aesthetic goals.

 
  • References

  • 1 Anderson JR. The dynamics of rhinoplasty. Presented at: Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress in Otorhinolaryngology; August 10–14 1969; Mexico City, Mexico. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Excerpta Medica, International Congress Series 206; 1970
  • 2 Tardy ME, Brown R. Surgical Anatomy of the Nose. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1990
  • 3 Janeke JB, Wright WK. Studies on the support of the nasal tip. Arch Otolaryngol 1971; 93: 458-464
  • 4 McCollough EG, Mangat D. Systematic approach to correction of the nasal tip in rhinoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol 1981; 107: 12-16
  • 5 Anderson JR. A plan of nasal tip surgery. Eye Ear Nose Throat Mon 1962; 41: 809-813
  • 6 Larrabee Jr WF. The tripod concept. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 115: 1168-1169
  • 7 Quatela VC, Slupchynskyj OS. Surgery of the nasal tip. Facial Plast Surg 1997; 13: 253-268
  • 8 Dobratz EJ, Tran V, Hilger PA. Comparison of techniques used to support the nasal tip and their long-term effects on tip position. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2010; 12: 172-179
  • 9 Toriumi DM. New concepts in nasal tip contouring. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006; 8: 156-185
  • 10 Ingels K, Orhan KS. Measurement of preoperative and postoperative nasal tip projection and rotation. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006; 8: 411-415
  • 11 Simons RL, Greene RM. Rhinoplasty5 pearls: value of the endonasal approach and vertical dome division. Clin Plast Surg 2010; 37: 265-283
  • 12 Adamson PA, McGraw-Wall BL, Morrow TA, Constantinides MS. Vertical dome division in open rhinoplasty. An update on indications, techniques, and results. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 120: 373-380
  • 13 Daele JJ, Leruth E, Goffart Y. Consensus in rhinoplasty. B-ENT 2010; 6 (Suppl 15) 109-113
  • 14 Adamson PA, Funk E. Nasal tip dynamics. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2009; 17: 29-40 , vi
  • 15 Westreich RW, Lawson W. The tripod theory of nasal tip support revisited: the cantilevered spring model. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008; 10: 170-179