Liver Tumor Characterization – Comments and Illustrations Regarding Guidelines

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a well established diagnostic imaging technique for a variety of indications and applications. One of the most important applications is in the liver where it is frequently a first-line technique for the detection and diagnosis (characterization) of focal liver lesions (FLLs). In this setting the accurate differentiation of benign lesions from malignant lesions is critical to ensure that the patient undergoes the appropriate therapeutic option. In this article the role of CEUS in the characterization of FLLs is described on the basis of recently published guidelines, in particular in terms of the enhancement patterns of the most common FLLs, e. g. hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia, hepatocellular adenoma and their differentiation from malignant lesions.

Zusammenfassung

Kontrastverstärkte Ultraschalltechniken (CEUS) wurden vor ca. 10 Jahren in die klinische Routine eingeführt und haben sich für vielfältige Indikationen im klinischen Alltag etabliert. Die kontrastverstärkte Sonografie ist in vielen Fällen die erste und auch entscheidende Technik zur Detektion und Charakterisierung von Lebertumoren. Diese Entwicklung wird durch vielfältige CEUS-Leitlinien reflektiert, beispielsweise durch die EFSUMB-Leitlinien 2004 und 2008. In diesem Artikel werden insbesondere die Tumorcharakteristika benigner Lebertumoren beschrieben.

Key words

diagnosis - characterization - metastases - hepatocellular carcinoma - focal nodular hyperplasia - hemamgioma - microbubble

• References

• 1 Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Hocke M et al. Pitfalls and artefacts using contrast enhanced ultrasound. Z Gastroenterol 2011; 49: 350-356
• 2 Dietrich CF, Kratzer W, Strobe D et al. Assessment of metastatic liver disease in patients with primary extrahepatic tumors by contrast-enhanced sonography versus CT and MRI. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12: 1699-1705
• 3 Cantisani V et al. Detection of Hepatic Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: Prospective Evaluation of Gray Scale US Versus SonoVue® Low Mechanical Index Real Time-Enhanced US as Compared with Multidetector-CT or Gd-BOPTA-MRI. Ultraschall in Med 2010; 31: 500-505
• 4 Mostbeck G. Bildgebende Diagnostik fokaler Leberläsionen: Die 90 %-Regel. Ultraschall in Med 2010; 31: 545-547
• 5 Strobel D, Seitz K, Blank W et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the characterization of focal liver lesions – diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice (DEGUM multicenter trial). Ultraschall in Med 2008; 29: 499-505
• 6 Trillaud H, Bruel JM, Valette PJ et al. Characterization of focal liver lesions with SonoVue-enhanced sonography: international multicenter-study in comparison to CT and MRI. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 3748-3756
• 7 Quaia E. The real capabilities of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the characterization of solid focal liver lesions. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 457-462
• 8 Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Trojan J et al. Improved characterisation of histologically proven liver tumours by contrast enhanced ultrasonography during the portal venous and specific late phase of SHU 508A. Gut 2004; 53: 401-405
• 9 Dietrich CF, Schuessler G, Trojan J et al. Differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Br J Radiol 2005; 78: 704-707
• 10 Albrecht T, Blomley M, Bolondi L et al. Guidelines for the use of contrast agents in ultrasound. January 2004. Ultraschall in Med 2004; 25: 249-256
• 11 Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) – update 2008. Ultraschall in Med 2008; 29: 28-44
• 12 Piscaglia F, Nolsoe C, Dietrich CF et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): Update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall in Med 2011; DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1281676.
• 13 Dietrich CF. Comments and illustrations regarding the guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) – update 2008. Ultraschall in Med 2008; 29: S188-S202
• 14 Moriyasu F, Itoh K. Efficacy of perflubutane microbubble-enhanced ultrasound in the characterization and detection of focal liver lesions: phase 3 multicenter clinical trial. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 86-95
• 15 Bryant TH, Blomley MJ, Albrecht T et al. Improved characterization of liver lesions with liver-phase uptake of liver-specific microbubbles: prospective multicenter study. Radiology 2004; 232: 799-809
• 16 Albrecht T, Blomley MJ, Burns PN et al. Improved detection of hepatic metastases with pulse-inversion US during the liver-specific phase of SHU 508A: multicenter study. Radiology 2003; 227: 361-370
• 17 Strobel D, Seitz K, Blank W et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the characterization of focal liver lesions – diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice (DEGUM multicenter trial). Ultraschall in Med 2008; 29: 499-505
• 18 Dietrich CF. Comments and illustrations regarding the guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) – update 2008. Ultraschall in Med 2008; 29: S188-S202
• 19 Piscaglia F et al. Diagnostic Features of Real-Time Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Focal Nodular Hyperplasia of the Liver. Ultraschall in Med 2010; 31: 276-282
• 20 Bernatik T et al. Unclear Focal Liver Lesions in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography – Lessons to be Learned from the DEGUM Multicenter Study for the Characterization of Liver Tumors. Ultraschall in Med 2010; 31: 577-581
• 21 Strobel D et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of CEUS in the Differential Diagnosis of Small (≤ 20 mm) and Subcentimetric (≤ 10 mm) Focal Liver Lesions in Comparison with Histology. Ultraschall in Med 2011; 32: 593-597
• 22 Seitz K, Strobel D, Bernatik T et al. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Characterization of focal Liver Lesions – Prospective Comparison in Clinical Practice: CEUS vs. CT (DEGUM Multicenter Trial). Ultraschall in Med 2009; 30: 383-389
• 23 Seitz K, Bernatik T, Strobel D et al. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) for the Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions in Clinical Practice (DEGUM Multicenter Trial): CEUS vs. MRI – a Prospective Comparison in 269 Patients. Ultraschall in Med 2010; 31: 492-499
• 24 Lencioni R, Cioni D, Crocetti L et al. Percutaneous ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: state-of-the-art. Liver Transpl 2004; 10: S91-S97
• 25 Solbiati L, Ierace T, Tonolini M et al. Guidance and monitoring of radiofrequency liver tumor ablation with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Eur J Radiol 2004; 51: S19-S23
• 26 Lorentzen T et al. Microwave Ablation of Liver Metastases Guided by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: Experience with 125 Metastases in 39 Patients. Ultraschall in Med 2011; 32: 492-496
• 27 Frieser M et al. Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced US versus CT or MRI for the Therapeutic Control of Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation in the Case of Hepatic Malignancies. Ultraschall in Med 2011; 32: 148-153
• 28 Bolondi L, Correas JM, Lencioni R et al. New perspectives for the use of contrast-enhanced liver ultrasound in clinical practice. Dig Liver Dis 2007; 39: 187-195
• 29 Schacherer D et al. Sono-Hepatic-Arteriography (Sono-HA) in the Assessment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE). Ultraschall in Med 2010; 31: 270-275
• 30 Ignee A, Jedrejczyk M, Schuessler G et al. Quantitative contrast enhanced ultrasound of the liver for time intensity curves-Reliability and potential sources of errors. Eur J Radiol 2010; 73: 153-158
• 31 Cosgrove D, Lassau N. Imaging of perfusion using ultrasound. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010; 37: S65-S85
• 32 Lassau N, Chami L, Chebil M et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCE-US) and anti-angiogenic treatments. Discov Med 2011; 11: 18-24
• 33 Lassau N, Chami L, Koscielny S et al. Quantitative functional imaging by Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography (DCE-US) in GIST patients treated with masatinib. Invest New Drugs 2012; 30: 765-771
• 34 Lassau N, Chebil M, Chami L et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCE-US): a new tool for the early evaluation of antiangiogenic treatment. Target Oncol 2010; 5: 53-58
• 35 Peronneau P, Lassau N, Leguerney I et al. Contrast Ultrasonography: Necessity of Linear Data Processing for the Quantification of Tumor Vascularization. Ultraschall in Med 2010; 31: 370-378
• 36 Dietrich CF, Braden B. Sonographic assessments of gastrointestinal and biliary functions. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2009; 23: 353-367
• 37 Zhou X, Strobel D, Haensler J et al. Hepatic transit time: indicator of the therapeutic response to radiofrequency ablation of liver tumours. Br J Radiol 2005; 78: 433-436
• 38 Albrecht T, Blomley MJ, Cosgrove DO et al. Transit-time studies with levovist in patients with and without hepatic cirrhosis: a promising new diagnostic tool. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: S377-S381
• 39 Bernatik T, Becker D, Neureiter D et al. Hepatic transit time of an echo enhancer: an indicator of metastatic spread to the liver. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 16: 313-317
• 40 Leen E, Anderson JR, Robertson J et al. Doppler index perfusion in the detection of hepatic metastases secondary to gastric carcinoma. Am J Surg 1997; 173: 99-102
• 41 Haendl T, Strobel D, Neureiter D et al. Vergleich der hepatischen Transitzeit (HTT) verschiedener Ultraschallkontrastmittel (USKM) bei Patienten mit Lebermetastasen und gesunden Probanden. Ultraschall in Med 2010; 31: 582-588
• 42 Strunk H, Borner N, Stuckmann G et al. Contrast-Enhanced “Low MI Real-Time“ Phase-Inversion Sonography to Differentiate Between Malignant and Benign Focal Liver Lesions. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 1394-1404
• 43 von Herbay A, Vogt C, Willers R et al. Real-time imaging with the sonographic contrast agent SonoVue: differentiation between benign and malignant hepatic lesions. J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23: 1557-1568
• 44 von Herbay A, Vogt C, Haussinger D. Differentiation between benign and malignant hepatic lesions: utility of color stimulated acoustic emission with the microbubble contrast agent Levovist. J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23: 207-215
• 45 von Herbay A, Vogt C, Haussinger D. Pulse inversion sonography in the early phase of the sonographic contrast agent Levovist: differentiation between benign and malignant focal liver lesions. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21: 1191-1200
• 46 von Herbay A, Vogt C, Haussinger D. Late-phase pulse-inversion sonography using the contrast agent levovist: differentiation between benign and malignant focal lesions of the liver. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 1273-1279
• 47 Quaia E, Alaimo V, Baratella E et al. Effect of observer experience in the differentiation between benign and malignant liver tumors after ultrasound contrast agent injection. J Ultrasound Med 2010; 29: 25-36
• 48 Schuessler G, Fellbaum C, Fauth F et al. The infammatory pseudotumour – an unusual liver tumour. Ultraschall in Med 2006; 27: 273-279
• 49 Xu HX, Xie XY, Lu MD et al. Unusual benign focal liver lesions: findings on real-time contrast-enhanced sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2008; 27: 243-254
• 50 Liu GJ, Lu MD, Xie XY et al. Real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of infected focal liver lesions. J Ultrasound Med 2008; 27: 657-666
• 51 Kim TK, Jang HJ, Wilson SR. Imaging diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma with differentiation from other pathology. Clin Liver Dis 2005; 9: 253-279
• 52 Strobel D, Kleinecke C, Hansler J et al. Contrast-enhanced sonography for the characterisation of hepatocellular carcinomas – correlation with histological differentiation. Ultraschall in Med 2005; 26: 270-276
• 53 Yu H, Jang HJ, Kim TK et al. Pseudoenhancement within the local ablation zone of hepatic tumors due to a nonlinear artifact on contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: 653-659
• 54 Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM et al. Hepatic resection for incidentaloma. J Gastrointest Surg 2004; 8: 785-793
• 55 Dietrich CF, Mertens JC, Braden B et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of histologically proven liver hemangiomas. Hepatology 2007; 45: 1139-1145
• 56 Jeong MG, Yu JS, Kim KW. Hepatic cavernous hemangioma: temporal peritumoral enhancement during multiphase dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 2000; 216: 692-697
• 57 Gossmann J, Scheuermann EH, Frilling A et al. Multiple adenomas and hepatocellular carcinoma in a renal transplant patient with glycogen storage disease type 1a (von Gierke disease). Transplantation 2001; 72: 343-344
• 58 Piscaglia F, Lencioni R, Sagrini E et al. Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010; 36: 531-550
• 59 Piscaglia F, Venturi A, Mancini M et al. Diagnostic features of real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound in focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver. Ultraschall in Med 2010; 31: 276-282
• 60 Nguyen BN, Flejou JF, Terris B et al. Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: a comprehensive pathologic study of 305 lesions and recognition of new histologic forms. Am J Surg Pathol 1999; 23: 1441-1454
• 61 Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Frey H. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound with low mechanical index: a new technique. Z Gastroenterol 2005; 43: 1219-1223
• 62 Dietrich CF. Contrast-enhanced low mechanical index endoscopic ultrasound (CELMI-EUS). Endoscopy 2009; 41: E43-E44
• 63 Gouysse G, Frachon S, Hervieu V et al. Endothelial cell differentiation in hepatocellular adenomas: implications for histopathological diagnosis. J Hepatol 2004; 41: 259-266
• 64 Celli N, Gaiani S, Piscaglia F et al. Characterization of liver lesions by real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 19: 3-14
• 65 Quaia E, Stacul F, Gaiani S et al. Comparison of diagnostic performance of unenhanced vs. SonoVue – enhanced ultrasonography in focal liver lesions characterization. The experience of three Italian centers. Radiol Med 2004; 108: 71-81
• 66 Cherqui D, Mathieu D, Zafrani ES et al. Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma in women. Current data. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1997; 21: 929-935
• 67 Bartolozzi C, Lencioni R, Paolicchi A et al. Differentiation of hepatocellular adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: comparison of power Doppler imaging and conventional color Doppler sonography. Eur Radiol 1997; 7: 1410-1415
• 68 Golli M, Van Nhieu JT, Mathieu D et al. Hepatocellular adenoma: color Doppler US and pathologic correlations. Radiology 1994; 190: 741-744
• 69 Cherqui D, Rahmouni A, Charlotte F et al. Management of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma in young women: a series of 41 patients with clinical, radiological, and pathological correlations. Hepatology 1995; 22: 1674-1681
• 70 Kim TK, Jang HJ, Burns PN et al. Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma: differentiation with low-mechanical-index contrast-enhanced sonography. Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190: 58-66
• 71 Bioulac-Sage P, Rebouissou S, Sa CA et al. Clinical, morphologic, and molecular features defining so-called telangiectatic focal nodular hyperplasias of the liver. Gastroenterology 2005; 128: 1211-1218
• 72 Paradis V, Benzekri A, Dargere D et al. Telangiectatic focal nodular hyperplasia: a variant of hepatocellular adenoma. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 1323-1329
• 73 Hirche TO, Ignee A, Hirche H et al. Evaluation of hepatic steatosis by ultrasound in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Liver Int 2007; 27: 748-757
• 74 Dietrich CF. Letter to the editor: Kratzer W et al. Prevalence and risk factors of focal sparing in hepatic steatosis. Ultraschall in Med 2010; 31: 417-419
• 75 Dietrich CF, Wehrmann T, Zeuzem S et al. Analysis of hepatic echo patterns in chronic hepatitis C. Ultraschall in Med 1999; 20: 9-14
• 76 Barreiros AP, Otto G, Ignee A et al. Sonographic signs of amyloidosis. Z Gastroenterol 2009; 47: 731-739
• 77 Ignee A, Piscaglia F, Ott M et al. A benign tumour of the liver mimicking malignant liver disease – cholangiocellular adenoma. Scand J Gastroenterol 2009; 44: 633-636
• 78 Xu HX, Chen LD. Villous adenoma of extrahepatic bile duct: contrast-enhanced sonography findings. J Clin Ultrasound 2008; 36: 39-41
• 79 Cui XW, Ignee A, Braden B et al. Biliary Papillomatosis and New Ultrasound Imaging Modalities. Z Gastroenterol 2012; 50: 226-231
• 80 Wang Z, Xu HX, Xie XY et al. Imaging features of hepatic angiomyolipomas on real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Br J Radiol 2010; 83: 411-418
• 81 Trojan J, Hammerstingl R, Engels K et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of malignant mesenchymal liver tumors. J Clin Ultrasound 2010; 38: 227-231
• 82 Wang ZL, Tang J, Weskott HP et al. Undetermined focal liver lesions on gray-scale ultrasound in patients with fatty liver: characterization with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 23: 1511-1519
• 83 Xu HX, Xie XY, Lu MD et al. Unusual benign focal liver lesions: findings on real-time contrast-enhanced sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2008; 27: 243-254
• 84 Barreiros AP, Braden B, Schieferstein-Knauer C et al. Characteristics of intestinal tuberculosis in ultrasonographic techniques. Scand J Gastroenterol 2008; 43: 1224-1231
• 85 Braden B, Helm B, Fabian T et al. Bacillary angiomatosis of the liver, a suspected ultrasound diagnosis?. Z Gastroenterol 2000; 38: 785-789
• 86 Braden B, Thalhammer A, Schwarz W et al. Bleeding complications from hepatic mucoidal aneurysmata: value of color duplex sonography after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2002; 8: 636-638
• 87 Kim SH, Lee JM, Kim WH et al. Focal peliosis hepatis as a mimicker of hepatic tumors: radiological-pathological correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007; 31: 79-85
• 88 Leinung S, Gutz U, Stolzel U et al. Peliosis hepatis: problems of differential diagnosis. Röntgenpraxis 2000; 52: 295-301
• 89 Okuda K, Omata M, Itoh Y et al. Peliosis hepatis as a late and fatal complication of thorotrast liver disease. Report of five cases. Liver 1981; 1: 110-122
• 90 Weiss D, Marti G, Mouton W et al. Infection with fasciola hepatica – a case series. Ultraschall in Med 2010; 31: 175-181
• 91 Weiss D, Marti G, Mouton W et al. Infection with fasciola hepatica – a case series. Ultraschall in Med 2010; 31: 175-181
• 92 Ignee A, Weiper D, Schuessler G et al. Sonographic characterisation of hepatocellular carcinoma at time of diagnosis. Z Gastroenterol 2005; 43: 289-294
• 93 Chen LD, Xu HX, Xie XY et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: differential diagnosis with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 743-753
• 94 Bauditz J, Schade T, Wermke W. Sonographic diagnosis of hilar cholangiocarcinomas by the use of contrast agents. Ultraschall in Med 2007; 28: 161-167
• 95 Vilana R, Forner A, Bianchi L et al. Intrahepatic peripheral cholangiocarcinoma in cirrhosis patients may display a vascular pattern similar to hepatocellular carcinoma on contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Hepatology 2010; 51: 2020-2029
• 96 Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 2011; 53: 1020-1022
• 97 Correas JM, Low G, Needleman L et al. Contrast enhanced ultrasound in the detection of liver metastases: a prospective multi-centre dose testing study using a perfluorobutane microbubble contrast agent (NC100100). Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 1739-1746
• 98 Hohmann J, Muller A, Skrok J et al. Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Liver Metastases With BR14: A Multicenter Phase IIA Study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2012; 38: 377-382
• 99 Mork H, Ignee A, Schuessler G et al. Analysis of neuroendocrine tumour metastases in the liver using contrast enhanced ultrasonography. Scand J Gastroenterol 2007; 42: 652-662
• 100 Dorffel Y, Wermke W. Neuroendocrine tumors: characterization with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Ultraschall in Med 2008; 29: 506-514
• 101 Foschi FG, Dall’Aglio AC, Marano G et al. Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in primary hepatic lymphoma. J Ultrasound Med 2010; 29: 1353-1356
• 102 Seitz G. Why are metastases in cirrhotic livers so rare?. Ultraschall in Med 1989; 10: 123-126
• 103 Seitz K, Greis C, Schuler A et al. Frequency of Tumor Entities among Liver Tumors of Unclear Etiology Initially Detected by Sonography in the Noncirrhotic or Cirrhotic Livers of 1349 Patients – Results of the DEGUM Multicenter Study. Ultraschall in Med 2011; 32: 598-603
• 104 Dietrich CF. Contrast-enhanced low mechanical index endoscopic ultrasound (CELMI-EUS). Endoscopy 2009; 41: E43-E44
• 105 Dietrich CF. 3D real time contrast enhanced ultrasonography,a new technique. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 160-163
• 106 Moriyasu F, Migihashi R, Matsumura T et al. Harmonic gray scale 3D contrast imaging of the liver. Acad Radiol 2002; 9: S228-S230
• 107 Hocke M, Dietrich CF. New technology – combined use of 3D contrast enhanced endoscopic ultrasound techniques. Ultraschall in Med 2011; 32: 317-318
• 108 Ignee A, Baum U, Schuessler G et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided percutaneous cholangiography and cholangiodrainage (CEUS-PTCD). Endoscopy 2009; 41: 725-726
• 109 Heinzmann A, Müller T, Leitlein J et al. Endocavitary Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) – Work in Progress. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33: 76-84
• 110 Thorelius L. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in trauma. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 43-52
• 111 Thorelius L. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: beyond the liver. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: N91-N108
• 112 Nilsson A, Loren I, Nirhov N et al. Power Doppler ultrasonography: alternative to computed tomography in abdominal trauma patients. J Ultrasound Med 1999; 18: 669-672
• 113 Cokkinos D, Antypa E, Stefanidis K et al. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Imaging Blunt Abdominal Trauma – Indications, Description of the Technique and Imaging Review. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33: 60-67