Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1312711
A Novel Method of Identifying the Internal Acoustic Canal in the Middle Fossa Approach in a Cadaveric Study—The Rule of 2s
Publication History
14 August 2011
13 January 2012
Publication Date:
17 May 2012 (online)
Abstract
Objective Multiple landmarks and anatomic relationships exist to identify internal acoustic canal (IAC) in middle fossa approach for removing intracanalicular schwannomas. We attempted to identify a reproducible, practical method to quickly identify the IAC that would be applicable when an expanded middle fossa approach is required.
Design Middle fossa approach was performed on 10 cadavers (21 dissections). In the first head, temporal and suboccipital craniotomies were performed to identify landmarks and formulate a hypothesis. Porous acusticus (PA) was identified and IAC was circumferentially skeletonized into middle fossa. Orientation of IAC in the middle fossa was evaluated in relation to foramen spinosum (FS), foramen ovale (FO), petrous ridge, and petrous apex. Consistency of this relationship was tested in the remaining heads.
Results The opening of PA (point A) was consistently found at a mean of 2.38 cm posterolateral to the petrous apex along the petrous ridge (range 2.1 to 2.8). A line was drawn from the FO to FS and extrapolated posteriorly. The IAC (point B) was found a mean distance of 2.39 cm from FS along the FS–FO line (range 2.1 to 2.8). The course of IAC was consistently found by connecting point A to point B.
Conclusion A novel, practical, and reproducible method is described to identify the IAC via the expanded middle fossa approach.
-
References
- 1 Bochenek Z, Kukwa A. An extended approach through the middle cranial fossa to the internal auditory meatus and the cerebello-pontine angle. Acta Otolaryngol 1975; 80 (5–6) 410-414
- 2 Catalano PJ, Eden AR. An external reference to identify the internal auditory canal in middle fossa surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 108 (2) 111-116
- 3 Cokkeser Y, Aristegui M, Naguib MB, Saleh E, Taibah AK, Sanna M. Identification of internal acoustic canal in the middle cranial fossa approach: a safe technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 124 (1) 94-98
- 4 Driscoll CL, Jackler RK, Pitts LH, Banthia V. Is the entire fundus of the internal auditory canal visible during the middle fossa approach for acoustic neuroma?. Am J Otol 2000; 21 (3) 382-388
- 5 Fisch U. Transtemporal surgery of the internal auditory canal. Report of 92 cases, technique, indications and results. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 1970; 17: 203-240
- 6 Garcia-Ibanez E, Garcia-Ibanez JL. Middle fossa vestibular neurectomy: a report of 373 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1980; 88 (4) 486-490
- 7 House WF, Shelton C. Middle fossa approach for acoustic tumor removal. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1992; 25 (2) 347-359
- 8 House WF. Surgical exposure of the internal auditory canal and its contents through the middle, cranial fossa. Laryngoscope 1961; 71: 1363-1385
- 9 Lee HK, Kim IS, Lee WS. New method of identifying the internal auditory canal as seen from the middle cranial fossa approach. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2006; 115 (6) 457-460
- 10 Parisier SC. The middle cranial fossa approach to the internal auditory canal—an anatomical study stressing critical distances between surgical landmarks. Laryngoscope 1977; 87 (4 Pt 2, Suppl 4) 1-20
- 11 Tanriover N, Sanus GZ, Ulu MO , et al. Middle fossa approach: microsurgical anatomy and surgical technique from the neurosurgical perspective. Surg Neurol 2009; 71 (5) 586-596 , discussion 596
- 12 Wigand ME, Aurbach G, Haid CT, Berg M, Goertzen W. Topographical anatomy of the internal auditory canal. Implications for functional surgery in the cerebello-pontine angle. Acta Otolaryngol 1991; 111 (2) 269-272
- 13 Wigand ME, Haid T, Berg M, Schuster B, Goertzen W. Extended middle cranial fossa approach for acoustic neuroma surgery. Skull Base Surg 1991; 1 (3) 183-187
- 14 Blevins NH, Jackler RK. Exposure of the lateral extremity of the internal auditory canal through the retrosigmoid approach: a radioanatomic study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 111 (1) 81-90
- 15 Molony TB, Kwartler JA, House WF, Hitselberger WE. Extended middle fossa and retrolabyrinthine approaches in acoustic neuroma surgery: case reports. Am J Otol 1992; 13 (4) 360-363
- 16 Kawase T, Shiobara R. Extended middle cranial fossa approaches to the clivus and acoustic meatus. In: Torrens M, Al-Mefty O, Kobayashi S, eds. Operative Skull Base Surgery. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1997: 263-278
- 17 Tsunoda A, Kimura Y, Sumi T, Komatsuzaki A, Sato T. The arcuate eminence is not a protrusion of the superior semi-circular canal but a trace of sulcus on the temporal lobe. J Laryngol Otol 2000; 114 (5) 339-344
- 18 Kartush JM, Kemink JL, Graham MD. The arcuate eminence. Topographic orientation in middle cranial fossa surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1985; 94 (1 Pt 1) 25-28
- 19 Tsunoda A. Arcuate eminence in Caucasian populations. J Laryngol Otol 2001; 115 (1) 9-13
- 20 Horsley V. The various surgical procedures devised for the relief of trigeminal neuralgia (tic douloureux). BMJ 1891; 2 (1613) 1139-1143
- 21 Papangelou L. Study of the human internal auditory canal. Laryngoscope 1972; 82 (4) 617-624
- 22 Jackler RK, Gladstone HB. Locating the internal auditory canal during the middle fossa approach: an alternative technique. Skull Base Surg 1995; 5 (2) 63-67