Download PDF
Suchttherapie 2012; 13(03): 121-125
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1312613
Schwerpunktthema
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Die deutsche Übersetzung des Motivational Interviewing Sequential Code for Observing Process Exchanges (MI-SCOPE;D)

The German Translation of the Motivational Interviewing Sequential Code for Observing Process Exchange (MI-SCOPE;D)
W. Hannöver
1   Institut für Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
,
C. Blaut
1   Institut für Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
,
C. Kniehase
1   Institut für Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
,
T. Martin
2   Department of Psychology, Kennesaw State University
,
H.-J. Hannich
1   Institut für Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 August 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Für die Untersuchungen der Wirkungsweise von MI bedarf es reliabler Instrumente. Das MI-SCOPE ermöglicht die Kodierung transkribierter MI-Interaktionen. Die Interraterreliabilität liegt bei к=0,67. Ziel dieser Studie ist die Überprüfung der Reliabilität der deutschen Übersetzung des MI-SCOPE. Die Kodierung erfolgt im ersten Schritt (Gliedern) über die Identifizierung sprachlicher Äußerungen, denen im zweiten Schritte eine von 49 Kategorien MI-relevanten Verhaltens zugeordnet werden. Datengrundlage bildet eine Zufallsauswahl von jeweils 20% aus 78 Sitzungen mit jungen Müttern, die vor oder während der Schwangerschaft geraucht hatten. 3 Kodierer kategorisierten paarweise unabhängig voneinander die Gespräche. Die Übereinstimmungen beim Gliedern lagen zwischen к=0,813 und к=0,951 und unterschieden sich zwischen den 3 Kodiererkombinationen nicht (Kruskal-Wallis χ2=0,704, df=2, p=0,703). Die Übereinstimmungen beim Kodieren lagen zwischen к=0,590 und к=0,788 und unterschieden sich zwischen den 3 Kodiererkombinationen nicht (Kruskal-Wallis χ2=3,594, df=2, p=0,166). Mit dem MI-SCOPE;D liegt ein reliables Kodiersystem zur Untersuchung von MI-Interventionen vor.

Abstract

To investigate the effectiveness of MI, reliable instruments are necessary. The MI-SCOPE enables coding of transcripted MI-interactions. The interrater-reliability is estimated with к=0.67. Aim of this study is to check the reliability of the German translation of the MI-SCOPE. In a first step, transcripts are parsed into separate semantic utterances. Parses are then assigned to one of 49 MI-relevant categories. Databasis is a random sample of 20% each from 78 sessions with post partum mothers who smoked prior to or in pregnancy. 3 coders independently rated the transcripts. Agreements for parsing lay between к=0.813 and к=0.951 and did not differ between the 3 combinations of coders (Kruskal-Wallis χ2=0.704, df=2, p=0.703). Agreements for coding ranged between к=0.590 and к=0.788 and did not differ between the 3 combinations of coders (Kruskal-Wallis χ2=3.594, df=2, p=0.166). With the MI-SCOPE;D a reliable coding system to investigate MI-interventions is available.

Schlüsselwörter

Motivational Interviewing - Kodiersystem - Beobachtungsschema - Rauchen - Schwangerschaft

Key words

motivational interviewing - coding system - observing scheme - smoking - pregnancy
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing. Preparing People for Change. 2. Aufl New York: Guilford; 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Cleary M, Hunt G, Matheson S et al. Psychosocial interventions for people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; CD001088
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Guy R, Hocking J, Low N et al. Interventions to increase rescreening for repeat chlamydial infection. Sex Transm Dis 2012; 39: 136-146
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Terplan M, Lui S. Psychosocial interventions for pregnant women in outpatient illicit drug treatment programs compared to other interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; CD006037
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bechdolf A, Pohlmann B, Geyer C et al. Motivationsbehandlung bei Patienten mit der Doppeldiagnose Psychose und Sucht. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2005; 73: 728-735
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Gates S, McCambridge J, Smith LA et al. Interventions for prevention of drug use by young people delivered in non-school settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; CD005030
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Grimshaw GM, Stanton A. Tobacco cessation interventions for young people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; CD003289
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Burke BL, Arkowitz H, Menchola M. The efficacy of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. J Consult Clin Psychol 2003; 71: 843-861
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hettema J, Steele J, Miller WR. Motivational interviewing. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2005; 1: 91-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hettema JE, Hendricks PS. Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation: a meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol 2010; 78: 868-884
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Jensen CD, Cushing CC, Aylward BS et al. Effectiveness of motivational interviewing interventions for adolescent substance use behavior change: a meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol 2011; 79: 433-440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T et al. Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2005; 55: 305-312
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Smedslund G, Berg RC, Hammerstrom KT et al. Motivational interviewing for substance abuse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; CD008063
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Tait RJ, Hulse GK. A systematic review of the effectiveness of brief interventions with substance using adolescents by type of drug. Drug Alcohol Rev 2003; 22: 337-346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Armstrong MJ, Mottershead TA, Ronksley PE et al. Motivational interviewing to improve weight loss in overweight and/or obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev 2011; 12: 709-723
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Carey KB, Scott-Sheldon LA, Carey MP et al. Individual-level interventions to reduce college student drinking: a meta-analytic review. Addict Behav 2007; 32: 2469-2494
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Cleary M, Hunt GE, Matheson S et al. Psychosocial treatments for people with co-occurring severe mental illness and substance misuse: systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2009; 65: 238-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gooding P, Tarrier N. A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioural interventions to reduce problem gambling: hedging our bets?. Behav Res Ther 2009; 47: 592-607
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Heckman CJ, Egleston BL, Hofmann MT. Efficacy of motivational interviewing for smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tob Control 2010; 19: 410-416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lai DT, Cahill K, Qin Y et al. Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; CD006936
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Vasilaki EI, Hosier SG, Cox WM. The efficacy of motivational interviewing as a brief intervention for excessive drinking: a meta-analytic review. Alcohol Alcohol 2006; 41: 328-335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Miller WR, Rose GS. Toward a theory of Motivational Interviewing. American Psychologist 2009; 64: 527-537
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: What it is, how it works, how to learn it. Two day workshop: Motivational Interviewing, introduction and update; 30.09. – 01.10.2011.2011; Cardiff, Wales
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Amrhein PC, Miller WR, Yahne CE et al. Client commitment language during motivational interviewing predicts drug use outcomes. J Consult Clin Psychol 2003; 71: 862-878
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Bem D. Self-perception theory. In: Berkowitz L. Hrsg Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press; 1972: 1-66
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Schwarzer R. Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Applied Psychology 2008; 57: 1-29
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Heckhausen H, Gollwitzer PM. Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind. Motiv Emotion 1987; 11: 101-120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Hallgren KA, Moyers TB. Does readiness to change predict in-session motivational language? Correspondence between two conceptualizations of client motivation. Addiction 2011; 106: 1261-1269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Barsky A, Coleman H. Evaluating skill acquisition in Motivational Interviewing: The development of an instrument to measure practice skills. J Drug Educ 2001; 31: 69-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Carroll KM, Nich C, Sifry RL et al. A general system for evaluating therapist adherence and competence in psychotherapy research in the addictions. Drug Alcohol Depend 2000; 57: 225-238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Lane C, Huws-Thomas M, Hood K et al. Measuring adaptations of motivational interviewing: the development and validation of the behavior change counseling index (BECCI). Patient Educ Couns 2005; 56: 166-173
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Madson MB, Campbell TC, Barrett DE et al. Development of the Motivational Interviewing Supervision and Training Scale. Psychol Addict Behav 2005; 19: 303-310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Moyers TB, Martin T. Therapist influence on client language during motivational interviewing sessions. J Subst Abuse Treat 2006; 30: 245-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Moyers TB, Martin T, Catley D et al. Assessing the integrity of Motivational Interviewing interventions: reliability of the Motivational Interviewing Skill Code. Behav Cogn Psychoth 2003; 31: 177-184
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Moyers TB, Martin T, Manuel JK et al. Assessing competence in the use of motivational interviewing. J Subst Abuse Treat 2005; 28: 19-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Rosengren DB, Hartzler B, Baer JS et al. The video assessment of simulated encounters-revised (VASE-R): reliability and validity of a revised measure of motivational interviewing skills. Drug Alcohol Depend 2008; 97: 130-138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Nicolai J, Demmel R, Hagen J. Rating scales for the assessment of empathic communication in medical interviews (REM): scale development, reliability and validity. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2007; 14: 367-375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Thyrian JR, Freyer-Adam J, Hannöver W et al. Adherence to the principles of Motivational Interviewing, clients’ characteristics and behavior outcome in a smoking cessation and relapse prevention trial in women postpartum. Add Behav 2007; 32: 2297-2303
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Thyrian JR, Freyer-Adam J, Hannöver W et al. Population based smoking cessation in women postpartum: The adherence to Motivational Interviewing in relation to clients characteristics and behavioural outcomes. Midwifery 2010; 26: 202-210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 John U, Hapke U, Rumpf HJ et al. Der Suchtforschungsverbund: Frühintervention bei substanzbezogenen Störungen (EARLINT). Sucht 2002; 48: 209-216
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Greve W, Wentura D. Wissenschaftliche Beobachtung: Eine Einführung. Weinheim: PVU/Beltz; 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Madson MB, Campbell TC. Measures of fidelity in motivational enhancement: a systematic review. J Subst Abuse Treat 2006; 31: 67-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Miller WR, Moyers TB. Eight stages in learning Motivational Interviewing. Journal of Teaching in the Addictions 2006; 5: 3-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Madson MB, Loignon AC, Lane C. Training in motivational interviewing: a systematic review. J Subst Abuse Treat 2009; 36: 101-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 McCambridge J, Day M, Thomas BA et al. Fidelity to Motivational Interviewing and subsequent cannabis cessation among adolescents. Addict Behav 2011; 36: 749-754
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Bakeman R, Quera V, McArthur D et al. Detecting sequential patterns and determining their reliability with fallible observers. Psychol Methods 1997; 2: 357-370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar