Download PDF
Semin Hear 2012; 33(02): 135-146
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1311674
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

A Grounded Theory Primer for Audiology

Christine N. Meston
1   Health and Rehabilitation Sciences
2   The University of Western Ontario
,
Stella L. Ng
2   The University of Western Ontario
3   Centre for Education Research & Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 May 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Corrected by:

A Grounded Theory Primer for AudiologySemin Hear 2012; 33(04): 434-436
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329884

Abstract

Grounded theory is a widely used qualitative research methodology and has been used in a variety of disciplines including anthropology, medicine, nursing, and sociology. Although qualitative research methodologies, including grounded theory, have existed for some time, there is lack of attention to the rigorous use of qualitative methodology in the field of audiology. Today, three major schools of grounded theory are present in the literature. It is important for clinicians and researchers new to grounded theory research to be familiar with the different schools of grounded theory that can be implemented in research including the history and philosophy of each. Such an understanding will enable researchers and clinicians to critically appraise applications of grounded theory methodology and to understand its potential, perhaps for inclusion in their own research programs. This article will provide a brief history of grounded theory, define the three major schools of grounded theory and the philosophical and theoretical underpinnings of each, as well as discuss the use of grounded theory in audiology research.

Keywords

grounded theory - qualitative - audiology - constructivist - Glaserian - pragmatist
 

  • References

  • 1 Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction; 1967
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Cutcliffe JR. Adapt or adopt: developing and transgressing the methodological boundaries of grounded theory. J Adv Nurs 2005; 51: 421-428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Morse JM. Tussles, tensions, and resolutions. In: Morse JM, Stern PN, Corbin J, , et al, eds. Developing Grounded Theory: The Second Generation. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press; 2009: 13-22
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996; 312: 71-72
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Pope C, Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ 1995; 311: 42-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Los Angeles, CA: Sage; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Bryant A, Charmaz K. Grounded theory in historical perspective: an epistemological account. In: Bryant A, Charmaz K, eds. The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007: 32-57
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London, UK: Sage; 2006
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994: 105-117
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Ponterotto JG. Qualitative research in counseling psychology: a primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. J Counsel Psychol 2005; 52: 126-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Charmaz K. Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000: 509-535
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Strauss AL, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1990
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Strauss AL, Corbin J. Grounded theory methodology: an overview. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994: 273-285
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Strauss AL, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Glaser BG. Doing formal theory. In: Bryant A, Charmaz K, eds. The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007: 97-113
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Glaser BG. Basics of grounded theory analysis: emergence vs. forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press; 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Blumer H. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1969
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Rennie DL. Grounded theory methodology as methodical hermeneutics. Theory Psychol 2000; 10: 481-502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Mills J, Bonner A, Francis K. The development of constructivist grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2006; 5: 25-35
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Charmaz K. Grounded theory in the 21st century: applications for advancing social justice studies. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005: 507-535
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Seale C. The Quality of Qualitative Research. London, UK: Sage; 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Bryant A. Re-grounding grounded theory. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 2002; 4: 25-42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Clarke A. Situational analyses: grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interact 2003; 26: 553-576
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Glaser BG, Holton J. Remodeling grounded theory. The Grounded Theory Review 2004; 4: 1-24
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Neill SJ. Grounded theory sampling. J Res Nurs 2006; 11: 253-
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Glaser BG. Constructivist grounded theory?. Forum Qual Soc Res 2002; 3
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Morse J. The significance of saturation. Qual Health Res 1995; 5: 147-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Dey I. Grounding Grounded Theory: Guidelines for Qualitative Inquiry. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Hood JC. Orthodoxy vs. power: the defining traits of grounded theory. In: Bryant A, Charmaz K, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Schwandt TA. The SAGE Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Ng S, Bartlett D, Lucy SD. Reflection as a window to student development: insight for faculty, preceptors, and mentors. Semin Hear 2012; 33: 147-162
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Gagne JP, Hétu B, Getty L. Towards the development of paradigms to conduct functional evaluative research in audiological rehabilitation. J Acad Reh 1995; 28: 7-25
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Boulton M, Fitzpatrick R, Swinburn C. Qualitative research in health care: II. A structured review and evaluation of studies. J Eval Clin Pract 1996; 2: 171-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Finlay L. “Going exploring”: the nature of qualitative research. In: Finlay L, Ballinger, eds. Qualitative Research for Allied Health Professionals: Challenging Choices. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2006: 3-8
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Crukley J, Dundas JA, McCreery R, Meston C, Ng S. Re-envisioning collaboration, hierarchy, and transparency in audiology education, practice, and research. Semin Hear 2012; 33: 196-206
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Charmaz K. Grounded theory. In: Hesse-Biber S, Leavy P, eds. Approaches to Qualitative Research: A Reader on Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2004: 496-521
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Palmer C. Evidence based decision making in hearing instrument selection, fitting, and outcomes. In: Proceedings of Hearing Care for Adults: An International Conference. Chicago, IL: Phonak, Inc.; 2006
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Moodie S, Johnson A, Scollie S. Evidence-based practice and Canadian audiology. Canadian Hearing Report 2008; 3: 12-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Cox RM. Evidence-based practice in audiology. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16: 408-409
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Kearney MH. Levels and applications of qualitative research evidence. Res Nurs Health 2001; 24: 145-153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Stern PN. Grounded theory methodology: its uses and processes. Image (IN) 1980; 12: 20-23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Crotty M. The Foundations of Social Research. London, UK: Sage; 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Plano-Clark VL, Creswell JW. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.; 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Mills J, Chapman Y, Bonner A, Francis K. Grounded theory: a methodological spiral from positivism to postmodernism. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2007; 58: 72-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar