Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 61(02): 109-115
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1311529
Original Thoracic
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Does Dose Matter? Effect of Two Different Neoadjuvant Protocols in Advanced NSCLC

Volker Steger
1   Clinic of Thoracic, Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Tübingen University, Tübingen, Germany
,
Stefanie Veit
2   Department of Thoracic Surgery, Schillerhöhe Hospital, Gerlingen, Germany
,
Tobias Walker
1   Clinic of Thoracic, Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Tübingen University, Tübingen, Germany
,
Godehard Friedel
2   Department of Thoracic Surgery, Schillerhöhe Hospital, Gerlingen, Germany
,
Karoline Lehrach
1   Clinic of Thoracic, Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Tübingen University, Tübingen, Germany
,
Migdat Mustafi
1   Clinic of Thoracic, Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Tübingen University, Tübingen, Germany
,
Thorsten Walles
2   Department of Thoracic Surgery, Schillerhöhe Hospital, Gerlingen, Germany
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

31. August 2011

20. Januar 2012

Publikationsdatum:
20. Juli 2012 (online)

Zoom Image

Abstract

Background For stage III, NSCLC neoadjuvant protocols have been intensified up to full dose protocols but up till now the effect of more intensive protocols in a trimodal setting could not be compared directly because of different selection criteria or experience of involved facilities in different studies or multicenter studies. We analyzed our experience with two different neoadjuvant protocols, consistent selection criteria, and surgical teams over 17-year time period.

Method Single-center retrospective study in 159 patients concerning survival, recurrence, and downstaging effect.

Results Overall median survival was 32 months, with 26 months for protocol 1, and 35 months for protocol 2, respectively. Hospital mortality was 5%. Log-rank test showed significant difference between the protocols for UICC-downstaging-effect, ypT-stage, ypN-stage, and ypUICC-stage, respectively, but only ypN-stage and ypUICC-stage were significant risk factors for survival using Cox regression.

Conclusion The median survival benefit of 9 months is evident but (probably still) not significant. The more aggressive protocol 2 shows a significant better downstaging effect concerning N- and UICC-stage if R0-resection can be achieved. Insofar dose does matter!