European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition – Communication

Multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis have been developed by experts in a project coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The full guideline document covers the entire process of population-based screening. It consists of 10 chapters and over 250 recommendations, graded according to the strength of the recommendation and the supporting evidence. The 450-page guidelines and the extensive evidence base have been published by the European Commission. The chapter on communication includes 35 graded recommendations. The content of the chapter is presented here to promote international discussion and collaboration by making the principles and standards recommended in the new EU Guidelines known to a wider professional and scientific community. Following these recommendations has the potential to enhance the control of colorectal cancer through improvement in the quality and effectiveness of screening programmes and services.

Key words

mass screening - colorectal neoplasms - communication - information strategies - population-based programmes - multidisciplinary evidence-based guidelines

• References

• 1 Abbott PA, Coenen A. Globalization and advances in information and communication technologies: the impact on nursing and health. Nurs Outlook 2008; 56: 238-246
• 2 Arbyn M, Anttila A, Jordan J et al. (eds.) European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening - second edition. 2nd. edition Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2008
• 3 Aro AR, de Koning HJ, Absetz P et al. Psychosocial predictors of first attendance for organised mammography screening. J Med Screen 1999; 6: 82-88
• 4 Atkin W, Valori R, Kuipers EJ et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition. Colonoscopic surveillance following adenoma removal. Endoscopy 2012;
• 5 Austoker J. Gaining informed consent for screening. Is difficult - but many misconceptions need to be undone.. BMJ 1999; 319: 722-723
• 6 Baker DW, Gazmararian JA, Sudano J et al. Health literacy and performance on the Mini-Mental State Examination. Aging Ment Health 2002; 6: 22-29
• 7 Basch CE, Wolf RL, Brouse CH et al. Telephone outreach to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban minority population. Am J Public Health 2006; 96: 2246-2253
• 8 Bastani R, Yabroff KR, Myers RE et al. Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening. Cancer 2004; 101: 1188-1200
• 9 Beauchamp TL, Childress G. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University; 1979
• 10 Braun KL, Fong M, Kaanoi ME et al. Testing a culturally appropriate, theory-based intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening among Native Hawaiians. Prev Med 2005; 40: 619-627
• 11 Brodie M, Foehr U, Rideout V et al. Communicating health information through the entertainment media. Health Aff (Millwood.) 2001; 20: 192-199
• 12 Brotherstone H, Miles A, Robb KA et al. The impact of illustrations on public understanding of the aim of cancer screening. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 63: 328-335
• 13 Brown ML, Potosky AL. The presidential effect: the public health response to media coverage about Ronald Reaganʼs colon cancer episode. Public Opin Q 1990; 54: 317-329
• 14 Campbell MK, James A, Hudson MA et al. Improving multiple behaviors for colorectal cancer prevention among african american church members. Health Psychol 2004; 23: 492-502
• 15 Chan EC, Vernon SW. Implementing an intervention to promote colon cancer screening through e-mail over the Internet: lessons learned from a pilot study. Med Care 2008; 46: S117-S122
• 16 Christie J, Itzkowitz S, Lihau-Nkanza I et al. A randomized controlled trial using patient navigation to increase colonoscopy screening among low-income minorities. J Natl Med Assoc 2008; 100: 278-284
• 17 Costanza ME, Luckmann R, Stoddard AM et al. Using tailored telephone counseling to accelerate the adoption of colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Detect Prev 2007; 31: 191-198
• 18 Council of the European Union. Council Recommendation of 2 December 2003 on cancer screening (2003/878/EC). Off J Eur Union; 2003: 34-38
• 19 Courtier R, Casamitjana M, Macia F et al. Participation in a colorectal cancer screening programme: influence of the method of contacting the target population. Eur J Cancer Prev 2002; 11: 209-213
• 20 Cram P, Fendrick AM, Inadomi J et al. The impact of a celebrity promotional campaign on the use of colon cancer screening: the Katie Couric effect. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 1601-1605
• 21 Davis TC, Williams MV, Marin E et al. Health literacy and cancer communication. CA Cancer J Clin 2002; 52: 134-149
• 22 Della LJ, Eroglu D, Bernhardt JM et al. Looking to the future of new media in health marketing: deriving propositions based on traditional theories. Health Mark Q 2008; 25: 147-174
• 23 Denberg TD, Coombes JM, Byers TE et al. Effect of a mailed brochure on appointment-keeping for screening colonoscopy: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145: 895-900
• 24 Dewalt DA, Berkman ND, Sheridan S et al. Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med 2004; 19: 1228-1239
• 25 Dexheimer JW, Talbot TR, Sanders DL et al. Prompting clinicians about preventive care measures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15: 311-320
• 26 Dietrich AJ, Tobin JN, Cassells A et al. Telephone care management to improve cancer screening among low-income women: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 563-571
• 27 Dolan JG, Frisina S. Randomized controlled trial of a patient decision aid for colorectal cancer screening. Med Decis Making 2002; 22: 125-139
• 28 Dolan NC, Ferreira MR, Davis TC et al. Colorectal cancer screening knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs among veterans: does literacy make a difference?. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 2617-2622
• 29 Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ 2006; 333: 417
• 30 Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F et al. GLOBOCAN 2008 v1.2, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10. [Internet] Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010 Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr Accessed on 05/04/2012
• 31 Ferreira MR, Dolan NC, Fitzgibbon ML et al. Health care provider-directed intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among veterans: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 1548-1554
• 32 Ford ME, Havstad SL, Davis SD. A randomized trial of recruitment methods for older African American men in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. Clin Trials 2004; 1: 343-351
• 33 Fox R. Informed choice in screening programmes: do leaflets help? A critical literature review.. J Public Health (Oxf) 2006; 28: 309-317
• 34 Fox S, Rainie L. The on-line health care revolution: How the Web helps Americans take better care of themselves. Washington D.C: The Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2000
• 35 Friedemann-Sanchez G, Griffin JM, Partin MR. Gender differences in colorectal cancer screening barriers and information needs. Health Expect 2007; 10: 148-160
• 36 Friedman LC, Everett TE, Peterson L et al. Compliance with fecal occult blood test screening among low-income medical outpatients: a randomized controlled trial using a videotaped intervention. J Cancer Educ 2001; 16: 85-88
• 37 Ganz PA. Advocating for the woman with breast cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 1995; 45: 114-126
• 38 Geller BM, Skelly JM, Dorwaldt AL et al. Increasing patient/physician communications about colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care practices. Med Care 2008; 46: 36-43
• 39 Giordano L, Webster P, Anthony C et al. Improving the quality of communication in organised cervical cancer screening programmes. Patient Educ Couns 2008; 72: 130-136
• 40 Goyder E, Barratt A, Irwig LM. Telling people about screening programmes and screening test results: how can we do it better?. J Med Screen 2000; 7: 123-126
• 41 Gren L, Broski K, Childs J et al. Recruitment methods employed in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. Clin Trials 2009; 6: 52-59
• 42 Griffith JM, Lewis CL, Brenner AR et al. The effect of offering different numbers of colorectal cancer screening test options in a decision aid: a pilot randomized trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008; 8: 4
• 43 Grilli R, Ramsay C, Minozzi S. Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; CD000389
• 44 Halloran S, Launoy G, Zappa M. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition. Faecal Occult Blood Testing. Endoscopy 2012;
• 45 Hart AR, Barone TL, Gay SP et al. The effect on compliance of a health education leaflet in colorectal cancer screening in general practice in central England. J Epidemiol Community Health 1997; 51: 187-191
• 46 Holland W, Stewart S, Masseria C. Policy Brief: Screening in Europe. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office; 2006
• 47 Hudson SV, Ohman-Strickland P, Cunningham R et al. The effects of teamwork and system support on colorectal cancer screening in primary care practices. Cancer Detect Prev 2007; 31: 417-423
• 48 James N, Daniels H, Rahman R et al. A study of information seeking by cancer patients and their carers. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2007; 19: 356-362
• 49 Jandorf L, Gutierrez Y, Lopez J et al. Use of a patient navigator to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban neighborhood health clinic. J Urban Health 2005; 82: 216-224
• 50 Jepson RG, Hewison J, Thompson AG et al. How should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening.. J Med Ethics 2005; 31: 192-196
• 51 Jerant A, Kravitz RL, Rooney M et al. Effects of a tailored interactive multimedia computer program on determinants of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled pilot study in physician offices. Patient Educ Couns 2007; 66: 67-74
• 52 Jimbo M, Nease Jr DE, Ruffin MT et al. Information technology and cancer prevention. CA Cancer J Clin 2006; 56: 26-36
• 53 Katz ML, Tatum C, Dickinson SL et al. Improving colorectal cancer screening by using community volunteers: results of the Carolinas cancer education and screening (CARES) project. Cancer 2007; 110: 1602-1610
• 54 Kim J, Whitney A, Hayter S et al. Development and initial testing of a computer-based patient decision aid to promote colorectal cancer screening for primary care practice. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2005; 5: 36
• 55 Lagerlund M, Sparen P, Thurfjell E et al. Predictors of non-attendance in a population-based mammography screening programme; socio-demographic factors and aspects of health behaviour. Eur J Cancer Prev 2000; 9: 25-33
• 56 Lairson DR, Dicarlo M, Myers RE et al. Cost-effectiveness of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening use. Cancer 2008; 112: 779-788
• 57 Landsorp-Vogelaar I, von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition. Introduction. Endoscopy 2012;
• 58 Lasser KE, Ayanian JZ, Fletcher RH et al. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 2008; 9: 15
• 59 Lewis CL, Brenner AT, Griffith JM et al. The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial. Implement Sci 2008; 3: 32
• 60 Ling BS, Trauth JM, Fine MJ et al. Informed decision-making and colorectal cancer screening: is it occurring in primary care?. Med Care 2008; 46: 23-S29
• 61 Lipkus IM, Green LG, Marcus A. Manipulating perceptions of colorectal cancer threat: implications for screening intentions and behaviors. J Health Commun 2003; 8: 213-228
• 62 Lipkus IM, Skinner CS, Dement J et al. Increasing colorectal cancer screening among individuals in the carpentry trade: test of risk communication interventions. Prev Med 2005; 40: 489-501
• 63 Makoul G, Cameron KA, Baker DW et al. A multimedia patient education program on colorectal cancer screening increases knowledge and willingness to consider screening among Hispanic/Latino patients. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 76: 220-226
• 64 Malila N, Senore C, Armaroli P. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition. Organisation. Endoscopy 2012;
• 65 Marcus AC, Mason M, Wolfe P et al. The efficacy of tailored print materials in promoting colorectal cancer screening: results from a randomized trial involving callers to the National Cancer Instituteʼs Cancer Information Service. J Health Commun 2005; 10: 83-104
• 66 McGarrity TJ, Long PA, Peiffer LP. Results of a repeat television-advertised mass screening program for colorectal cancer using fecal occult blood tests. Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85: 266-270
• 67 McGarrity TJ, Long PA, Peiffer LP et al. Results of a television-advertised public screening program for colorectal cancer. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149: 140-144
• 68 Meade CD, McKinney WP, Barnas GP. Educating patients with limited literacy skills: the effectiveness of printed and videotaped materials about colon cancer. Am J Public Health 1994; 84: 119-121
• 69 Menon U, Szalacha LA, Belue R et al. Interactive, culturally sensitive education on colorectal cancer screening. Med Care 2008; 46: 44-50
• 70 Miglioretti DL, Rutter CM, Bradford SC et al. Improvement in the diagnostic evaluation of a positive fecal occult blood test in an integrated health care organization. Med Care 2008; 46: 91-S96
• 71 Miller Jr DP, Kimberly Jr JR, Case LD et al. Using a computer to teach patients about fecal occult blood screening. A randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med 2005; 20: 984-988
• 72 Minozzi S, Armaroli P, Banzi R et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis – First edition. Appendix 1: Systematic evidence review. 2010 http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/european-guidelines-for-quality-assurance-in-colorectal-cancer-screening-and-diagnosis-pbND3210390/ Accessed 11/2/2012
• 73 Minozzi S, Armaroli P, Segnan N. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition. Principles of evidence assessment and methods for reaching recommendations. Endoscopy 2012;
• 74 Moss S, Ancelle-Park R, Brenner H. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition. Evaluation and interpretation of screening outcomes. Endoscopy 2012;
• 75 Myers RE, Hyslop T, Sifri R et al. Tailored navigation in colorectal cancer screening. Med Care 2008; 46: 123-131
• 76 Myers RE, Ross E, Jepson C et al. Modeling adherence to colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med 1994; 23: 142-151
• 77 Myers RE, Ross EA, Wolf TA et al. Behavioral interventions to increase adherence in colorectal cancer screening. Med Care 1991; 29: 1039-1050
• 78 Myers RE, Sifri R, Hyslop T et al. A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening. Cancer 2007; 110: 2083-2091
• 79 Myers RE, Turner B, Weinberg D et al. Impact of a physician-oriented intervention on follow-up in colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med 2004; 38: 375-381
• 80 Nash D, Azeez S, Vlahov D et al. Evaluation of an intervention to increase screening colonoscopy in an urban public hospital setting. J Urban Health 2006; 83: 231-243
• 81 National Cancer Institute (NCI). Designing Print Materials: A communications guide for breast cancer screening. Bethesda: International Cancer Screening Network; 2007 http://appliedresearch.cancer.gov/icsn/publications/designing_print_materials_bw.pdf Accessed 11/2/2012
• 82 Nease Jr DE, Ruffin MT, Klinkman MS et al. Impact of a generalizable reminder system on colorectal cancer screening in diverse primary care practices: a report from the prompting and reminding at encounters for prevention project. Med Care 2008; 46: 68-73
• 83 Nicholson RA, Kreuter MW, Lapka C et al. Unintended effects of emphasizing disparities in cancer communication to African-Americans. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008; 17: 2946-2953
• 84 O'Connor AM, Bennett CL, Stacey D et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; CD001431
• 85 Percac-Lima S, Grant RW, Green AR et al. A culturally tailored navigator program for colorectal cancer screening in a community health center: a randomized, controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 2009; 24: 211-217
• 86 Pereira JL, Koski S, Hanson J et al. Internet usage among women with breast cancer: an exploratory study. Clin Breast Cancer 2000; 1: 148-153
• 87 Pignone M, Harris R, Kinsinger L. Videotape-based decision aid for colon cancer screening. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2000; 133: 761-769
• 88 Powe BD, Ntekop E, Barron M. An intervention study to increase colorectal cancer knowledge and screening among community elders. Public Health Nurs 2004; 21: 435-442
• 89 Quirke P, Risio M, Lambert R et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition. Quality assurance in pathology in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. Endoscopy 2012;
• 90 Raffle AE. Informed participation in screening is essential. BMJ 1997; 314: 1762-1763
• 91 Rao SK, Schilling TF, Sequist TD. Challenges in the management of positive fecal occult blood tests. J Gen Intern Med 2009; 24: 356-360
• 92 Rimer BK, Briss PA, Zeller PK et al. Informed decision making: what is its role in cancer screening?. Cancer 2004; 101: 1214-1228
• 93 Robb KA, Miles A, Campbell J et al. Can cancer risk information raise awareness without increasing anxiety? A randomized trial.. Prev Med 2006; 43: 187-190
• 94 Rubin DT, Ulitsky A, Poston J et al. What is the most effective way to communicate results after endoscopy?. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 108-112
• 95 Ruffin MT, Fetters MD, Jimbo M. Preference-based electronic decision aid to promote colorectal cancer screening: results of a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 2007; 45: 267-273
• 96 Schroy III PC, Glick JT, Robinson PA et al. Has the surge in media attention increased public awareness about colorectal cancer and screening?. J Community Health 2008; 33: 1-9
• 97 Segnan N, Patnick J, von Karsa L et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis - First edition. Luxembourg: European Commission, Publications Office of the European Union; 2010
• 98 Senore C, Armaroli P, Silvani M et al. Comparing different strategies for colorectal cancer screening in Italy: predictors of patients' participation. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 188-198
• 99 Sequist TD, Zaslavsky AM, Marshall R et al. Patient and physician reminders to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169: 364-371
• 100 Department for Education and Skills. Skills for life survey. A national needs and impact survey of literacy, numeracy and ITC skills. 2003 http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RB490.pdf Accessed 11/2/2012
• 101 Steckelberg A, Kasper J, Redegeld M et al. Risk information–barrier to informed choice? A focus group study.. Soz Praventivmed 2004; 49: 375-380
• 102 Steele RJC, Pox C, Kuipers EJ et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition. Managment of lesions detected in colorectal cancer screening. Endoscopy 2012;
• 103 Steele RJC, Rey J-F, Lambert R. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: First edition. Professional requirements and training. Endoscopy 2012; 44: SE106-SE115
• 104 Stokamer CL, Tenner CT, Chaudhuri J et al. Randomized controlled trial of the impact of intensive patient education on compliance with fecal occult blood testing. J Gen Intern Med 2005; 20: 278-282
• 105 Sudore RL, Mehta KM, Simonsick EM et al. Limited literacy in older people and disparities in health and healthcare access. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006; 54: 770-776
• 106 Sudore RL, Yaffe K, Satterfield S et al. Limited literacy and mortality in the elderly: the health, aging, and body composition study. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21: 806-812
• 107 Thompson NJ, Boyko EJ, Dominitz JA et al. A randomized controlled trial of a clinic-based support staff intervention to increase the rate of fecal occult blood test ordering. Prev Med 2000; 30: 244-251
• 108 Tilley BC, Vernon SW, Myers R et al. The Next Step Trial: impact of a worksite colorectal cancer screening promotion program. Prev Med 1999; 28: 276-283
• 109 Trevena LJ, Irwig L, Barratt A. Randomized trial of a self-administered decision aid for colorectal cancer screening. J Med Screen 2008; 15: 76-82
• 110 Turner BJ, Weiner M, Berry SD et al. Overcoming poor attendance to first scheduled colonoscopy: a randomized trial of peer coach or brochure support. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23: 58-63
• 111 Valori R, Rey J-F, Atkin W et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition. Quality assurance in endoscopy in colorectal screening and diagnosis. Endoscopy 2012;
• 112 van Rijn AF, van Rossum LG, Deutekom M et al. Getting adequate information across to colorectal cancer screening subjects can be difficult. J Med Screen 2008; 15: 149-152
• 113 van Wieringen JC, Harmsen JA, Bruijnzeels MA. Intercultural communication in general practice. Eur J Public Health 2002; 12: 63-68
• 114 Vernon SW, Meissner HI. Evaluating approaches to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening: lessons learned from pilot studies in diverse primary care settings. Med Care 2008; 46: 97-102
• 115 von Karsa L, Anttila A, Ronco G et al. Cancer Screening in the European Union. Report on the implementation of the Council Recommendation on Cancer Screening - First Report. Luxembourg: European Commission; 2008 http://ec.europa.eu/health/archive/ph_determinants/genetics/documents/cancer_screening.pdf Accessed 11/2/2012
• 116 von Karsa L, Lignini TA, Patnick J et al. The dimensions of the CRC problem. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 24: 381-396
• 117 Wardle J, Williamson S, McCaffery K et al. Increasing attendance at colorectal cancer screening: testing the efficacy of a mailed, psychoeducational intervention in a community sample of older adults. Health Psychol 2003; 22: 99-105
• 118 Wee CC, McCarthy EP, Phillips RS. Factors associated with colon cancer screening: the role of patient factors and physician counseling. Prev Med 2005; 41: 23-29
• 119 Wilson JM, Jungner YG. Principles and practice of mass screening for disease. World Health Organization; 1968 http://whqlibdoc.who.int/php/WHO_PHP_34.pdf Accessed 11/2/2012
• 120 Woodrow C, Watson E, Rozmovits L et al. Public perceptions of communicating information about bowel cancer screening. Health Expect 2008; 11: 16-25
• 121 Zapka J. Innovative provider- and health system-directed approaches to improving colorectal cancer screening delivery. Med Care 2008; 46: 62-S67
• 122 Zapka JG, Lemon SC, Puleo E et al. Patient education for colon cancer screening: a randomized trial of a video mailed before a physical examination. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 683-692
• 123 Zheng YF, Saito T, Takahashi M et al. Factors associated with intentions to adhere to colorectal cancer screening follow-up exams. BMC Public Health 2006; 6: 272